U.S. announces nearly $6 billion in funding for Ukraine

The below data is from 2017.

Ukraine Oil reserves
Ukraine has a century-long history of oil and gas production and possesses substantial conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon reserves, estimated at 9 billion tonnes of oil equivalent (Btoe).

Ukraine Gas Reserves
39,000,000 MMcf
Global Rank: 23rd | Share of World's Gas: 0.56 %

36 years of natural gas left
(at current consumption levels)

Summary Table​


Million Cubic Ft
(MMcf)
Global Rank
39,000,000 23rd in the world
670,98536th in the world
1,171,92829th in the world
Yearly Deficit​
-500,943
Gas Imports​
500,943
Gas Exports​
0
500,943

And IIRC - there are far more substantial Gas reserve deposits (according to a 2020/21 survey) in the Black-Sea and Eastern-Ukraine areas, then those mentioned above.

E.g.
From Wikipedia,

See also: Russia–Ukraine gas disputes and Natural gas transmission system of Ukraine
Ternopil
Ukraine extracts about 20 billion cubic meters of fossil gas each year, and since 2022 this has almost met demand.[1] Ukraine has been estimated to possess natural gas reserves of over 670 billion cubic meters (in 2022),

E.g. From Rand Corporation

Ukraine does indeed control Europe's second-largest known reserves of natural gas, almost 80 percent of which are located east of the Dnipro River. And though Ukraine theoretically might have considerable shale gas reserves, Russia currently has no experience or technology for shale gas production. For shale oil production, Russia has historically relied on Western technology. However, this reliance has been seriously impeded since 2017, when the United States introduced sanctions to ban American companies from providing shale oil extraction technologies to Russia.

Russia’s invasion and continued possession of the Donbass region and the Crimea Peninsula since March 2014 has subsequently caused significant, strategic level damage to Ukraine’s economy. Looking at Figures 5 and 6, the fighting between Ukraine and the DPR/LPR in the southern edges of the Dnipro-Donetsk basin, along with its proximity to Russia-Ukraine borders, would appear to deny Ukraine the full use of its largest oil and gas basin. Furthermore, the possession of Crimea by Russia would appear to deny Ukraine access to its Crimea Oil and Gas basin as well as use of its Deepwater Licences due to the risk of Russian naval activity in the Black Sea.

Adding to the above problems is the impact of Russia’s invasion on Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in the industry. After the conflict began in 2014, oil and gas firms Royal Dutch Shell and Chevron withdrew their investments in the Yuzovsky and Olesska shale gas blocks, affecting even the Carpathian basin despite it being insulated from the fighting. As shown in Figures 4-6, the withdrawal of these investments has amplified the impact of losing the Dnipro-Donetsk basin and the Crimea basin Central Intelligence Agency, 2021; Intelligence Fusion, 2021).


View attachment 1065846


Despite the enormous potential of Ukraine’s energy reserves, there are non-trivial costs to developing Ukraine’s capabilities. According to an assessment study by the Ukrainian Institute for the Future, a transformation of Ukraine into a self-sufficient energy consumer and potential exporter would require a number of investments amounting to approximately US$19.5 billion. Of this amount, about US$3.5 billion are needed for developing gas fields and building pipelines, US$14 billion would have to be invested into oil extraction, and US$2 billion would go toward oil refining.

Hydrogen is another new horizon for Ukraine’s underdeveloped energy industry. Today, various gas distribution companies are examining Ukraine’s pipeline capacities with the hope of converting some of the existing infrastructure to deliver hydrogen to their customers in the future. The EU has identified Ukraine as a priority partner for future collaboration in the use of hydrogen to enhance the Union’s energy supply and security.
Well, it is somewhat contradictory. One part of your post says about 0.56% of a global share, another one about great (possible, still unproven) deposits.

About the shale gas. This theme isn't new. It became to gain momentum in 2015-2016 or so years, when rumors began circulating that the 'Maidan government' was going to lease great swathes of Ukrainian land to American companies for this gas extraction by cracking. And how this method was going to destroy these lands for generations. How things are in reality, I don't know.
 
Well, it is somewhat contradictory. One part of your post says about 0.56% of a global share, another one about great (possible, still unproven) deposits.
The 0.56% or 0.60% are in reference to Ukraine's factual existing reserves - not untapped resources.

Most likely you can't read German


The German parliaments - special commission for natural resources Ukraine had stated in it's October 2023 finalized report, that around US$24 Billion of FACTUAL natural resources, incl. rare-earth metals, are presently controlled by Russia - aka in these occupied territories alone. Again this does not include untapped resources. These US$24 Billion equate to 20% of Ukraine's known natural resource - reserves.

Aka, present known factual existing natural reserves in Ukraine add up in total to around US$ 120 Billion. - not incl. untapped resources.

Russia has therefore logically and factually prevented any significant exploitation of Ukraine's natural/mineral untapped resources during the Soviet-era and especially since Ukraine's independence in 1990. Ukraine itself has also retracted all of it's previous 2022 information regarding untapped resources, and previously published content, has been removed - due to national security concerns.

In summation of this German Parliament Commissions report - Ukraine has untapped natural resources that can totally compensate the entire EU demand, purchased prior to 2022 from Russia. Foremost in regards to rare-earth minerals, metals and natural gas.

Therefore an EU/NATO controlled Ukraine - thus providing the respective financial, technical and unrestricted means to exploit untapped natural resources - is a major, or even a death blow to Russia's economy.

Interesting side-note in this report - these untapped resources would also endanger/eliminate the USA's strategy of making the EU reliant onto the USA, in regards to foremost LNG - and would make the USA depended on Ukrainian rare-earth minerals and metals. - since Russia and China might cut down, or even refuse to sell these natural resources to the USA. Which in turn lends further credence to the long held US policy of getting their hands or control, onto Canada and Greenland.
 
Last edited:
The 0.56% or 0.60% are in reference to Ukraine's factual existing reserves - not untapped resources.

Most likely you can't read German


The German parliaments - special commission for natural resources Ukraine had stated in it's October 2023 finalized report, that around US$24 Billion of FACTUAL natural resources, incl. rare-earth metals, are presently controlled by Russia - aka in these occupied territories alone. Again this does not include untapped resources. These US$24 Billion equate to 20% of Ukraine's known natural resource - reserves.

Aka, present known factual existing natural reserves in Ukraine add up in total to around US$ 120 Billion. - not incl. untapped resources.

Russia has therefore logically and factually prevented any significant exploitation of Ukraine's natural/mineral untapped resources during the Soviet-era and especially since Ukraine's independence in 1990. Ukraine itself has also retracted all of it's previous 2022 information regarding untapped resources, and previously published content, has been removed - due to national security concerns.

In summation of this German Parliament Commissions report - Ukraine has untapped natural resources that can totally compensate the entire EU demand, purchased prior to 2022 from Russia. Foremost in regards to rare-earth minerals, metals and natural gas.

Therefore an EU/NATO controlled Ukraine - thus providing the respective financial, technical and unrestricted means to exploit untapped natural resources - is a major, or even a death blow to Russia's economy.

Interesting side-note in this report - these untapped resources would also endanger/eliminate the USA's strategy of making the EU reliant onto the USA, in regards to foremost LNG - and would make the USA depended on Ukrainian rare-earth minerals and metals. - since Russia and China might cut down, or even refuse to sell these natural resources to the USA. Which in turn lends further credence to the long held US policy of getting their hands or control, onto Canada and Greenland.
Maybe, I can't argue with that. Maybe Ukraine really has/had huge 'untapped resources'. But I think that without proper research work on the ground, talking about them is like betting in a casino.

About natural resources being the main cause of the war, I don't know. Not so sure about that.

For Russia (or, more correctly, for the Putin regime), it is more about their imperial/global sentiments of the former empire and the Soviet Union and personal ambitions of the czar.

For Europe, well, there is no Europe in this equation. Leaderless, ambitionless, and inert substance that follows in the tail of American foreign policy. It is incapable of any military operation against a large standing military.

For America, definitely not resources. Their prime goal here is weakening/destruction one of their main competitors - European industrial and technological cluster.
 
The European Parliament calls not to recognize the results of future presidential elections in Belarus.
You see how it is? The elections haven't even started yet, and they already don't recognize them. This is a preventive non-recognition, (like Biden's preemptive pardons) they even have brought the results of the future elections, now they will show it.
 
Two residents of Kiev are suspected of illegal use of humanitarian aid for profit during martial law. This was reported by the Podillya district prosecutor's office in Kiev.

According to the investigation, during two years the charitable organization imported into Ukraine from the EU countries about 200 cars as aid for the AFU. However, instead of being transferred to the military, the cars were sold.

The 42-year-old organizer was responsible for importing cars, customs clearance and determining the sale price, while her accomplice was engaged in finding buyers and transferring cars for money. While documenting the illegal activities, law enforcers conducted a controlled purchase: they bought two cars for $17,000 - a Ford Transit minibus and a Mitsubishi Pajero SUV, imported under the guise of humanitarian aid.

The seller was detained immediately after the transaction. During searches, law enforcers seized another 17 cars imported through a charitable organization controlled by the criminals.
 
Back
Top Bottom