Two Federal District Court Judges order a hold on SNAP cutoff

[Mac-7]

Hey idiot. The emergency fund doesn’t have to be voted on by Congress. It’s already set aside for emergencies such as the shutdown. Do research sometimes.

This is an executive legislative decision

The judge is exceeding his authority

 

[hadit]

Hey idiot. The emergency fund doesn’t have to be voted on by Congress. It’s already set aside for emergencies such as the shutdown. Do research sometimes.

From where does the judicial branch get the authority to dictate the spending actions of the executive branch? The judge would have been equally authoritative dictating that the Senate has to go nuclear and make Schumer sit down and shut up.

 

[JohnDB]

 

[SeaMajor7]

These judges apparently need to take a civics class, or maybe check out school house rock or something.

 

[JWBooth]

The annoying orange is capitulating to the judges. The EBT cards will be somewhat funded from Dept. of Ag. emergency funds. I've not seen anything on what the formula for funding will be.
The indolent win again.

 

[Mac-7]

The annoying orange is capitulating to the judges. The EBT cards will be somewhat funded from Dept. of Ag. emergency funds. I've not seen anything on what the formula for funding will be.
The indolent win again.

That wont last long unless the price of lobster goes WAY down

The emergency fund is finite and not big enough to support welfare bums in the manner they are accustomed to

 

[JWBooth]

That wont last long unless the price of lobster goes WAY down

The emergency fund is finite and not big enough to support welfare bums in the manner they are accustomed to

Among my many disappointments is that there wasn't even token resistance.

 

[Mac-7]

Among my many disappointments is that there wasn't even token resistance.

Resistance to what?

The money only delays the inevitable and libs will be out of options

 

[JWBooth]

Resistance to what?

The money only delays the inevitable and libs will be out of options

No appeal of the court's ruling. No questioning of their authority in this matter, no questioning the precedent.

 

[Godboy]

Hey idiot. The emergency fund doesn’t have to be voted on by Congress. It’s already set aside for emergencies such as the shutdown. Do research sometimes.

It wouldnt even cover 1 month. The emergency fund is only 6 billion dollars. We spend 8 billion per month on SNAP.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

This is an executive legislative decision

The judge is exceeding his authority

Because a guy named Mac-7 didn’t like it.

 

[Mac-7]

No appeal of the court's ruling. No questioning of their authority in this matter, no questioning the precedent.

Thats probably smart politics

Trump may not want to own the image of fighting to deny SNAP money

Which may sound cynical but in the long run works

 

[Mac-7]

Because a guy named Mac-7 didn’t like it.

Am I not entitled to my opinion?

 

[BackAgain]

BackAgain once again refuses to say where in the law it says that natural disasters count as emergencies for shutdown purposes.
Keep dodging dodger.

Lying Lib can’t point to me even making the claim. So, propagandist lying **** that he is, he simply repeats his lie. Again

Keep lying liar.

Or, man up and post the claim you falsely accuse me of having made.

 

[JohnDB]

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Lying Lib can’t point to me even making the claim. So, propagandist lying **** that he is, he simply repeats his lie. Again

Keep lying liar.

Or, man up and post the claim you falsely accuse me of having made.

BackAgain says he can’t comment on whether the Food and Nutrition Act makes any mention of natural disasters as the only events qualifying as emergencies.

He made 9 comments dodging the question.
He appears to age with me though, because he says he never made up the natural disasters thing. He did, but regrets it.

 

[Rawley]

That makes no sense. A violation of the law is not legal.
Silence is your best friend, buddy. You’re digging a bigger hole for yourself.

Try following the issue

 

[Rawley]

Lying Lib can’t point to me even making the claim. So, propagandist lying **** that he is, he simply repeats his lie. Again

Keep lying liar.

Or, man up and post the claim you falsely accuse me of having made.

Seems he's getting worse with the lying.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Try following the issue

This the dude who asked me at the beginning of the thread to please tell him what the law at the center of the case was. Because he doesn’t have Google.

And then he lied about the contingency fund not existing. You followed the issue. But you lied about the issue.

Sit down.

 

[Rawley]

This the dude who asked me at the beginning of the thread to please tell him what the law at the center of the case was. Because he doesn’t have Google.

Read the statute "dude" Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. § 2027)