Conservative from Georgia
Diamond Member
- Oct 24, 2018
- 4,145
- 3,526
- 1,938
From the contingency fund. The money was already there. No one has to “go get “ that money.Where do they get the money during a shutdown?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
From the contingency fund. The money was already there. No one has to “go get “ that money.Where do they get the money during a shutdown?
Proof?Millions of kids have food insecurity, and millions go hungry.
Did these two judges also tell Trump how he can appropriate spending on a program which has run out of funding?A federal judge in Rhode Island on Friday afternoon blocked the Trump administration from suspending all food aid for millions of Americans amid the ongoing government shutdown, in a case brought by a group of US cities, nonprofit organizations and a trade union.
And at almost the same time, in a separate but similar case, a federal judge in Massachusetts ruled that the government must continue to fund the program that helps low-income households stave off food insecurity, in a case brought by the Democratic attorneys general from 22 states and the District of Columbia and three governors who sued the administration.
MSN
Well, now that two district court judges said it I guess it will be ignored twice as hard.
Slapped down in 3, 2, 1.
That contingency fund is there in the event of an emergency. A government shutdown is not an emergency.From the contingency fund. The money was already there. No one has to “go get “ that money.
Breaking News: The judges have been overruled by “tahuyama”, a message board judge from the USMB circuit.That contingency fund is there in the event of an emergency. A government shutdown is not an emergency.
The fact is that the contingency money is there in the event of an emergency. That would be a tornado, earthquake, flooding or a hurricane. A government shutdown and a program running out of funding isn’t an emergency.Breaking News: The judges have been overruled by “tahuyama”, a message board judge from the USMB circuit.
But legally they can't use it, which is why Trump is appealing the decision.From the contingency fund. The money was already there. No one has to “go get “ that money.
Says judge kyzr from USMB.But legally they can't use it, which is why Trump is appealing the decision.
That makes no sense. A violation of the law is not legal.The Trump administration responded brilliantly. Ok judge, tell us how we can legally violate the law?
It makes perfect sense. The Trump administration was ordered by a judge to violate the law. Seeing that’s the case, the judge needs to tell them how they can legally violate the law.That makes no sense. A violation of the law is not legal.
Silence is your best friend, buddy. You’re digging a bigger hole for yourself.
Whoosh. Right over the head of ^ lib.That makes no sense. A violation of the law is not legal.
Silence is your best friend, buddy. You’re digging a bigger hole for yourself.
Yeah. Not a smart responseWhoosh. Right over the head of ^ lib.
Oh yeah. I forgot you lied about theIt makes perfect sense. The Trump administration was ordered by a judge to violate the law. Seeing that’s the case, the judge needs to tell them how they can legally violate the law.
Says the guy who claims to be the decider of legality.Yeah. Not a smart response
I said emergencies. An emergency would be a natural disaster or something not created by partisan politics.Oh yeah. I forgot you lied about the
Food and Nutrition Act (FNA) saying anything about natural disasters being the only events that would count as an emergency.
Then I asked you to quote the law and you’ve been dodging since.