He didn't drain the swamp because he didn't realize how bad it actually was. Who would have known how deep it actually went ? We are talking years and years of certain agenda's operating in and along side of administration after administration. Like a cat just waiting to strike, they saw that Trump was pulling on their strings to much, and so of course they couldn't stand it, and it was on and they pounced.
There were a lot of things he didn’t know. That was very very apparent
You called it "assumptions" based geo data taken from cell phones, otherwise attempting to separate the data from the actions of the user's by claiming that the users intent doesn't match up with the interpretation of the data and investigative journalism being used. In your assumption or attempt used, law enforcement in the case I'm talking about never could have made the connection stick if you were the deciding interpretor of the data and action's of the crook, and this by way of your huge bias on the case.
They are assumptions based on geo data. What do you think is being proven by the geo data?
Without it going to trial we'll never know, and we all know why the court's won't go anywhere near that political football for fear of being sacked as soon as they touch it. The Democrat force was strong in their opinions, and the court's wanted to stay out of it because they didn't want the mob after them, otherwise like they still ran into over the R-v-W case now being revisited.
Ok good so you are admitting that this movie did not prove a stolen election but only fuels suspicion of fraud.
I never said all the cameras were shut off. Some were never turned on. Can you comprehend what you read? Or is the fact that fraud is all but proven rattle your tiny traitor brain?
They are not unsubstantiated. The evidence put forward establishes multiple people going to multiple drop boxes and going to non-profits in between trips. Those are facts. You claim they are doing something else while repeatably showing up at those places is what is unsubstantiated.
You’ve been boasting about 1000s of mules and 4 million minutes of video correct? Are you telling me not one of the videos has an actual geo tracked mule going to multiple boxes on it?
I’m not claiming they are doing something else. I’m not claiming they are doing anything because THERE IS NO EVIDENCE SHOWING WHAT THEY ARE DOING. You are the dimwit claiming to know what they are doing and saying that your assumptions are verified proof of a stolen election. That’s you lying
No I am not telling you that. I say they could easily show that. In fact, the movie did show one black man doing exactly that in the early AM hours. You just were not paying attention. Now you prove that it did not.
What would any sane person think they are doing? You are not qualified to answer.
Oh wow, interesting, what’s the time code on that, I’d love to take a look
It makes zero difference what anybody thinks they are doing. We are talking about proof of a stolen election. There needs to be proof of such a dangerous claim…. Not assumptions of what you think dots on a map are doing. Admit you’ve been lying
Watch the movie again and pay attention this time.
People going repeatably to different boxes and non-profits, that you have admitted they have done, would be for what other purpose? 100% turnout in cities where the mules were is another way to prove it. As I have said before only the swing states large shitholes had that kind of turnout, why?
thepalmierireport.com
Can’t point to the “proof” you claim is there?! Shocking
Circumstantial evidence is being ignored by the court's and the DOJ, and after the mob went after SC justice's, we can easily see why.
Watch it again, you will see it. Can you prove it is not there?
