Turley says the quiet part out loud.

[struth]

What you people are is Dopes.

Haha maybe but I know what second hand smoke is

 

[busybee01]

True. But he also said that there is enough evidence for an Impeachment Inquiry.

It sounded like a hail mary last play of the game pass. There was no evidence presented nor even a hint of one. They had to try and palm off a fraudulent text message. Even AOC gave Republicans a spanking.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Haha maybe but I know what second hand smoke is

I'm not sure you do.

You make lots of dubious claims. Just ask anyone around here.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

But you said -
"there is plenty of evidence. Now is the time to put all that evidence together in an official capacity."

You're saying the House Committee's hearings and investigations were not official.

too funny

What part of that don't you comprehend?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It sounded like a hail mary last play of the game pass. There was no evidence presented nor even a hint of one. They had to try and palm off a fraudulent text message. Even AOC gave Republicans a spanking.

Wishful dreaming thanks for the laugh at your ignorant ass

 

[bigrebnc1775]

What about listing as an article of impeachment in the first trial, Trump's obstruction of Congress, is a witch hunt?

ARTICLE II: OBSTRUCTION OF CONGRESS
The Constitution provides that the House of Representatives “shall have the sole Power of Impeachment” and that the President “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors”. In his conduct of the office of President of the United States—and in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed—Donald J. Trump has directed the unprecedented, categorical, and indiscriminate defiance of subpoenas issued by the House of Representatives pursuant to its“ sole Power of Impeachment”. President Trump has abused the powers of the Presidency in a manner offensive to, and subversive of, the Constitution, in that: The House of Representatives has engaged in an impeachment inquiry focused on President Trump’s corrupt solicitation of the Government of Ukraine to interfere in the 2020 United States Presidential election. As part of this impeachment inquiry, the Committees undertaking the investigation served subpoenas seeking documents and testimony deemed vital to the inquiry from various Executive Branch agencies and offices, and current and former officials. In response, without lawful cause or excuse, President Trump directed Executive Branch agencies, offices, and officials not to comply with those subpoenas. President Trump thus interposed the powers of the Presidency against the lawful subpoenas of the House of Representatives, and assumed to himself functions and judgments necessary to the exercise of the “sole Power of Impeachment” vested by the Constitution in the House of Representatives. President Trump abused the powers of his high office through the following means1) Directing the White House to defy a lawful subpoena by withholding the production of documents sought therein by the Committees.(2) Directing other Executive Branch agencies and offices to defy lawful subpoenas and withhold the production of documents and records from the Committees—in response to which the Department of State, Office of Management and Budget, Department of Energy, and Department of Defense refused to produce a single document or record.

Simp trump didn't obstruct. You want obstruction? Try looking at what Hillary did. Hell the DOJ is obstructing this investigation

 

[bigrebnc1775]

What you people are is Dopes.

What you are is a projectionist

 

[struth]

I'm not sure you do.

You make lots of dubious claims. Just ask anyone around here.

Hahah no I do, I know it’s evidence of fire…that’s more then I can say aboit you until a few post ago

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Hahah no I do, I know it’s evidence of fire…that’s more then I can say aboit you until a few post ago

Second hand smoke -- you're a dope.

 

[struth]

Second hand smoke -- you're a dope.

Haha or maybe you can’t understand your own link

Wait you still don’t believe that evidence of a fire??? Haha

 

[Hutch Starskey]

You are back to babbling.

I could set you straight if you could unplug your ears and open your eyes and if you were willing to at last give logic and honesty a try.

There is no contradiction in asserting (1) that there is evidence warranting an impeachment investigation and (2) asserting that there is at present insufficient evidence to warrant an impeachment.

So, despite your frantic and frenetic efforts to conflate thoae two things, it turns out that Turley hasn’t “pissed” in my pool, at all.

Hurry back when you have more of your special brand of nothing to offer.

I’m not conflating anything, dupe.
I’m pointing out that there never was any evidence of criminality like you have so stupidly asserted for the last months.
You’re literally reduced to babbling how one failed investigation is now evidence sufficient for another investigation.

Truly retarded logic.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

No, he did not have an "on going" inquiry. He was Chair of the Oversight Committee, that uncovered boat loads of evidence, enough to open what we have now, an Impeachment Inquiry. The Oversight Committee conducts oversight of all of the Executive branch, and has other things to do. The impeachment inquiry is focusing on the evidence turned over, inquiring more into it and the possiblity of impeachment,

 

[bodecea]

True. But he also said that there is enough evidence for an Impeachment Inquiry.

Go right ahead...as the country shuts down.

 

[berg80]

Fox Legal Analyst Derides ‘Theatrical’ GOP Biden Impeachment — Designed to Distract from Trump Trials

But then he appeared to ridicule the reason for the entire proceedings, saying, “The reason for doing this, a lot of it is theatrical,” McCarthy said. “A lot of it’s about the 2024 election. And a lot of it is that the faction pushing for this wants to have kind of a parallel proceeding going on while Trump is going through these trials in the criminal justice system. So a lot of this is, you know, performance and politics.”

Even conservative firebrand and former US Attorney Sol Wisenberg agreed with McCarthy, saying, “But it is theater, and there’s not going to be a removal.”
https://www.mediaite.com/tv/fox-leg...hment-designed-to-distract-from-trump-trials/

When they are admitting on Faux that the Repubs are engaged in Kabuki theater you know it's bad.

 

[berg80]

True. But he also said that there is enough evidence for an Impeachment Inquiry.

See post #314.

 

[struth]

Fox Legal Analyst Derides ‘Theatrical’ GOP Biden Impeachment — Designed to Distract from Trump Trials

But then he appeared to ridicule the reason for the entire proceedings, saying, “The reason for doing this, a lot of it is theatrical,” McCarthy said. “A lot of it’s about the 2024 election. And a lot of it is that the faction pushing for this wants to have kind of a parallel proceeding going on while Trump is going through these trials in the criminal justice system. So a lot of this is, you know, performance and politics.”

Even conservative firebrand and former US Attorney Sol Wisenberg agreed with McCarthy, saying, “But it is theater, and there’s not going to be a removal.”
https://www.mediaite.com/tv/fox-leg...hment-designed-to-distract-from-trump-trials/

When they are admitting on Faux that the Repubs are engaged in Kabuki theater you know it's bad.

They are admitting that he has no chance of being removed by the demafasict in the senate…no matter what is exposed in the inquiry…so in that regard it’s threater…but nonetheless the president isn’t above the law, and the evidence supports the inquiry at least, at this point

 

[berg80]

the evidence supports the inquiry

No it doesn't, not even close. Baseless allegations justify nothing.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

As one of their first witnesses, Republicans called on Jonathan Turley, a conservative legal scholar who previously served as a Justice Department tax attorney. Turley was set to act as a content witness to help analyze the Biden family’s business dealings—but even he admitted there’s not enough evidence.

“I do not believe that the evidence currently meets the standard of a high crime and misdemeanor needed for an article of impeachment,” Turley said in written testimony submitted ahead of the hearing.

Turley also said he did believe it was “warranted” for the House to investigate potential connections between Biden and his son Hunter’s business dealings. But Republicans have been doing just that for months, and they still haven’t found proof linking the president to Hunter Biden’s work.

Republicans’ Key “Biden Corruption” Witness Torches Their Entire Claims

If you want to hold a big impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden, maybe make sure your witnesses are on the same page first.

newrepublic.com

Was this something they knew he was going to say?

Fox News law analyst says what?

 

[struth]

No it doesn't, not even close. Baseless allegations justify nothing.

Haha baseless? Haha they have testimony, bank records, wire transfers, the list goes on

 

[BackAgain]

Ocasio-Cortez was correct that Donalds left out critical context – specifically, context that showed there was no sign that the purported text exchange between James Biden and Hunter Biden was about business dealings. The information released by House Republicans this week appeared to show that James Biden’s purported text about getting “help” from Joe Biden came in direct response to a purported Hunter Biden text saying he could not afford alimony, school tuition for his children, food and gas “w/o [without] Dad.” Donalds did not display this purported Hunter Biden text at the Thursday hearing.

Do you frequently have trouble comprehending plain English?

No. That’s you. You live to embrace quibbling bullshit.

It’s retarded, but you do you.