Turley says the quiet part out loud.

An opinion piece from CNN “sums things up” in the usual distorted and dishonest fashion.

Next.
Not an opinion piece as evidenced by the granular way they fact check the Repub's false assertions.

Facts First: Donalds didn’t invent the James Biden text message, but Ocasio-Cortez was correct that Donalds left out critical context – specifically, context that showed there was no sign that the purported text exchange between James Biden and Hunter Biden was about business dealings. The information released by House Republicans this week appeared to show that James Biden’s purported text about getting “help” from Joe Biden came in direct response to a purported Hunter Biden text saying he could not afford alimony, school tuition for his children, food and gas “w/o [without] Dad.” Donalds did not display this purported Hunter Biden text at the Thursday hearing.

In other words, when James Biden purportedly mentioned the possibility of several months of help from Joe Biden, he gave no indication he was referring to some sort of business transaction, much less the foreign transactions that House Republicans have been focused on in their investigations into the president. But Donalds didn’t make that clear.

With that said, Ocasio-Cortez herself could have been clearer about what she meant when she claimed the image Donalds showed was “fabricated.”

The contents of the purported James Biden text Donalds displayed were not made up, according to the IRS whistleblowers. What appeared to be novel was the graphic Donalds used; he showed the text in a form that made it look like a screenshot from an iPhone text conversation, with white words over a blue background bubble. The House Republican spreadsheet that the words were taken from did not include any such graphics, and, again, it did include the preceding purported Hunter Biden message that Donalds didn’t show.
 
How does quoting the vapid opinions of a scumbag like that idiot, Synthia, support your lie?

You’re a failure on every level, dainty.
He was on the Hannity forum in the mid-2000s along with CrusaderFrank and BackAgain (Liability) and they were all Bush-worshippers.

I was recently cleaning out an old hard drive and ran across a bunch of screenshots from those days. When i get time im going to read through them to see if i have anything to embarrass these three stooges with.
:laugh:
Too funny Oddball , CrusaderFrank , and KneeJerk. The Three Stooges
 
Not an opinion piece as evidenced by the granular way they fact check the Repub's false assertions.

Facts First: Donalds didn’t invent the James Biden text message, but Ocasio-Cortez was correct that Donalds left out critical context – specifically, context that showed there was no sign that the purported text exchange between James Biden and Hunter Biden was about business dealings. The information released by House Republicans this week appeared to show that James Biden’s purported text about getting “help” from Joe Biden came in direct response to a purported Hunter Biden text saying he could not afford alimony, school tuition for his children, food and gas “w/o [without] Dad.” Donalds did not display this purported Hunter Biden text at the Thursday hearing.

In other words, when James Biden purportedly mentioned the possibility of several months of help from Joe Biden, he gave no indication he was referring to some sort of business transaction, much less the foreign transactions that House Republicans have been focused on in their investigations into the president. But Donalds didn’t make that clear.

With that said, Ocasio-Cortez herself could have been clearer about what she meant when she claimed the image Donalds showed was “fabricated.”

The contents of the purported James Biden text Donalds displayed were not made up, according to the IRS whistleblowers. What appeared to be novel was the graphic Donalds used; he showed the text in a form that made it look like a screenshot from an iPhone text conversation, with white words over a blue background bubble. The House Republican spreadsheet that the words were taken from did not include any such graphics, and, again, it did include the preceding purported Hunter Biden message that Donalds didn’t show.
Obviously an opinion piece. And their “analysis” isn’t “granular.” It’s gibberish.

They could stand on their heads and fart Nicole’s while saying “no, no, no” and be every bit as convincing in their fauxnalysis.
 
I keep telling you I admire what democrats are still able to get away with (Born in Kenya Barack & Big Mikey, cheating in the tens of millions column in 2020) the same way I admired Uncle Joe Stalin for twisting FDR around his finger and controlling the Allied war efforts.

Stop being so ashamed and evasive!

Own your successes!
I am not interested in your pathetic fantasies.
 
There is evidence and there is an investigation.

The left can't seem to conflate the two enough to protect their beloved pedophile in charge.

Turley.....enough evidence (or supposed evidence) to warrant an investigation.

Turley....said investigation did not turn up enough (he didn't say it didn't turn up anything) to warrant an impeachment proceeding.

I trust Turley.
Not a shred of evidence a single penny went to Biden. And really not much else. Turley three the freaks a bone while publicly embarrassing them.
 
Hmm…
Comer didn’t have an ongoing inquiry that you all said produced plenty of evidence of criminality?

No, he did not have an "on going" inquiry. He was Chair of the Oversight Committee, that uncovered boat loads of evidence, enough to open what we have now, an Impeachment Inquiry. The Oversight Committee conducts oversight of all of the Executive branch, and has other things to do. The impeachment inquiry is focusing on the evidence turned over, inquiring more into it and the possiblity of impeachment,
 
in reply to:

"Second hand smoke is no evidence of a fire."

Why do you even bother to post here?
why not? why do you think second hand smoke isn't evidence of a fire?

what do you think it's evidence of? do you know what second hand smoke is?
 
They were official. Unlike the trump witch hunt Republicans are using the correct process to impeachment
What about listing as an article of impeachment in the first trial, Trump's obstruction of Congress, is a witch hunt?

ARTICLE II: OBSTRUCTION OF CONGRESS
The Constitution provides that the House of Representatives “shall have the sole Power of Impeachment” and that the President “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors”. In his conduct of the office of President of the United States—and in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed—Donald J. Trump has directed the unprecedented, categorical, and indiscriminate defiance of subpoenas issued by the House of Representatives pursuant to its“ sole Power of Impeachment”. President Trump has abused the powers of the Presidency in a manner offensive to, and subversive of, the Constitution, in that: The House of Representatives has engaged in an impeachment inquiry focused on President Trump’s corrupt solicitation of the Government of Ukraine to interfere in the 2020 United States Presidential election. As part of this impeachment inquiry, the Committees undertaking the investigation served subpoenas seeking documents and testimony deemed vital to the inquiry from various Executive Branch agencies and offices, and current and former officials. In response, without lawful cause or excuse, President Trump directed Executive Branch agencies, offices, and officials not to comply with those subpoenas. President Trump thus interposed the powers of the Presidency against the lawful subpoenas of the House of Representatives, and assumed to himself functions and judgments necessary to the exercise of the “sole Power of Impeachment” vested by the Constitution in the House of Representatives. President Trump abused the powers of his high office through the following means1) Directing the White House to defy a lawful subpoena by withholding the production of documents sought therein by the Committees.(2) Directing other Executive Branch agencies and offices to defy lawful subpoenas and withhold the production of documents and records from the Committees—in response to which the Department of State, Office of Management and Budget, Department of Energy, and Department of Defense refused to produce a single document or record.
 
Not a shred of evidence a single penny went to Biden. And really not much else. Turley three the freaks a bone while publicly embarrassing them.

I'll take him at his word.

You've shown yourself to be narrow-minded, a hack, and pretty stupid.
 
Obviously an opinion piece. And their “analysis” isn’t “granular.” It’s gibberish.

They could stand on their heads and fart Nicole’s while saying “no, no, no” and be every bit as convincing in their fauxnalysis.
StripMall, please...
 
why not? why do you think second hand smoke isn't evidence of a fire?

what do you think it's evidence of? do you know what second hand smoke is?
:auiqs.jpg:I thought this was the 'How stupid are Trump voters?" thread. :auiqs.jpg:

The second hand smoke you're inhaling is from the shit the MAGA GOP is smoking -- It's called 'Dope' for a reason

  • Secondhand smoke (SHS) is smoke from burning tobacco products, like cigarettes, cigars, hookahs, or pipes.1,2,3
  • Secondhand smoke exposure occurs when people breathe in smoke breathed out by people who smoke or from burning tobacco products.
 
They were official. Unlike the trump witch hunt Republicans are using the correct process to impeachment
But you said -
"there is plenty of evidence. Now is the time to put all that evidence together in an official capacity."

You're saying the House Committee's hearings and investigations were not official.

too funny
 
Obviously an opinion piece. And their “analysis” isn’t “granular.” It’s gibberish.
Ocasio-Cortez was correct that Donalds left out critical context – specifically, context that showed there was no sign that the purported text exchange between James Biden and Hunter Biden was about business dealings. The information released by House Republicans this week appeared to show that James Biden’s purported text about getting “help” from Joe Biden came in direct response to a purported Hunter Biden text saying he could not afford alimony, school tuition for his children, food and gas “w/o [without] Dad.” Donalds did not display this purported Hunter Biden text at the Thursday hearing.

Do you frequently have trouble comprehending plain English?
 
Obviously an opinion piece. And their “analysis” isn’t “granular.” It’s gibberish.

They could stand on their heads and fart Nicole’s while saying “no, no, no” and be every bit as convincing in their fauxnalysis.
Odd, don't you think, since AOC's humiliation of Donalds is a national story that he has not, to my knowledge, tried to refute the exposure of his deceit?
 
:auiqs.jpg:I thought this was the 'How stupid are Trump voters?" thread. :auiqs.jpg:

The second hand smoke you're inhaling is from the shit the MAGA GOP is smoking -- It's called 'Dope' for a reason

  • Secondhand smoke (SHS) is smoke from burning tobacco products, like cigarettes, cigars, hookahs, or pipes.1,2,3
  • Secondhand smoke exposure occurs when people breathe in smoke breathed out by people who smoke or from burning tobacco products.
I didn't think tobacco was called dope.

but yes, it is from something burning....like a fire.

glad you learned something today
 

Forum List

Back
Top