Tulsi Gabbard - Worst Cabinet Pick in History - John Bolton

[marvin martian]

Normally that should tell you something, shouldn't it? Russia, Iran, Iraq, China, North Korea are enemies, are they not? Is being peaceful and joining them (do what they do) the answer?

You tell me, are those nations you would like to live at/in?

The constant warmongering of you people - Biden, Harris, Cheney, Bolton - is the reason you lost everything this year.

 

[Lesh]

She was competent enough to see through the lies about Syrian gas attacks and Ukrainian biolabs. Why couldn't you?

Ummmm

Wow

So she’s competent enough to please the QKrew

Wonderful

 

[Luckyone]

The constant warmongering of you people - Biden, Harris, Cheney, Bolton - is the reason you lost everything this year.

Prove that "warmongering of the Democrats" is THE REASON why they lost!

My information says they lost because Harris was a woman and was Black, only had 3 months to prepare and was not the person nominated by the people, and that the public in general were conned into believing that Trump will be able to accomplish what he failed at in his first incompetently run term.

I have not seen where "warmongering of the Democrats" was the reason for the loss.

Can you prove your words?

So far in all your posts to me, you have yet to PROVE anything.

 

[LeroyDumonde]

Ummmm

Wow

So she’s competent enough to please the QKrew

Wonderful

Victoria Nuland admitted that Ukraine has biolabs. These biolabs were funded by the United States thanks to Senator Obama in 2005.

 

[Luckyone]

Victoria Nuland admitted that Ukraine has biolabs. These biolabs were funded by the United States thanks to Senator Obama in 2005.

Link to that info please!

 

[LeroyDumonde]

You mean that alone qualifies her to be the Intelligence DIRECTOR?

Gabbard supports intelligence officers leaking information to the public. Do you agree with her on that?

In December 2020, shortly before she left Congress, Gabbard introduced legislation that would repeal the Patriot Act and Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, two of the most significant surveillance authorities passed by Congress after September 11, 2001.

Yes, get rid of the unPATRIOTic Act.

In early 2022, Gabbard endorsed Russian President Vladimir Putin’s rationale for the invasion of Ukraine, pinning the blame not on Moscow but on the Biden administration’s failure to acknowledge “Russia’s legitimate security concerns regarding Ukraine’s becoming a member of NATO.”

Are you saying that Russia doesn't have legitimate security concerns over Ukraine joining NATO? If Russia started building nuclear missile silos in, say, Cuba, would that be a legitimate security concern for America?

 

[marvin martian]

Prove that "warmongering of the Democrats" is THE REASON why they lost!

My information says they lost because Harris was a woman and was Black, only had 3 months to prepare and was not the person nominated by the people, and that the public in general were conned into believing that Trump will be able to accomplish what he failed at in his first incompetently run term.

I have not seen where "warmongering of the Democrats" was the reason for the loss.

Can you prove your words?

So far in all your posts to me, you have yet to PROVE anything.

DemoKKKrat warmongering was one of them. DemoKKKrat inflation was another. DemoKKKrat fiscal lunacy was a third. DemoKKKrat 24/7 hate media was a fourth. DemoKKKrat crime and violence was a fifth. DemoKKKrat Jew-hatred was a sixth. DemoKKKrat racism was a seventh.

I could go on...

 

[Lesh]

Yes, get rid of the unPATRIOTic Act.


Are you saying that Russia doesn't have legitimate security concerns over Ukraine joining NATO? If Russia started building nuclear missile silos in, say, Cuba, would that be a legitimate security concern for America?

Putin did not invade Ukraine to stop them from joining NATO. He did it because he wanted to. And nobody’s building missile silos

 

[LeroyDumonde]

Link to that info please!

 

[scruffy]

Prove that "warmongering of the Democrats" is THE REASON why they lost!

My information says they lost because Harris was a woman and was Black,

Your misinformation sucks.

Your people are lying to you.

Harris is dumb as a box of rocks, that's why she lost.

only had 3 months to prepare and was not the person nominated by the people,

Whose fault was that, dumbshit?

and that the public in general were conned into believing that Trump will be able to accomplish what he failed at in his first incompetently run term.

Conned? By who? Who did the conning?

What you mean is YOU LOST because the country was tired of the leftard bullshit.

I have not seen where "warmongering of the Democrats" was the reason for the loss.

One of many.

Can you prove your words?

So far in all your posts to me, you have yet to PROVE anything.

lol

To you? Why? You won't get it anyway.

 

[LeroyDumonde]

Putin did not invade Ukraine to stop them from joining NATO. He did it because he wanted to. And nobody’s building missile silos

You know his reasons because you are psychic?

 

[Lesh]

You’ll find bio labs on most parts of the world.

That doesn’t mean shit

 

[blackhawk]

Bolton saying that.

 

[Lesh]

You’ll find bio labs on most parts of the world.

That doesn’t mean shit

But she went well beyond that until she had to walk it back

Tulsi Gabbard Clarifies Ukraine Bio Labs Remarks After Widespread Outrage

The former Democratic congresswoman was accused of being a "Russian asset" for her comments about biological labs in Ukraine.

www.newsweek.com

 

[LeroyDumonde]

You’ll find bio labs on most parts of the world.

That doesn’t mean shit

The point that you're desperately trying to avoid is that the opponents of Gabbard falsely claimed that she said that Ukraine had bioweapons labs. She said it had biolabs, which it does, with materials that she didn't want to fall into the hands of Russia.

 

[Lesh]

The point that you're desperately trying to avoid is that the opponents of Gabbard falsely claimed that she said that Ukraine had bioweapons labs. She said it had biolabs, which it does, with materials that she didn't want to fall into the hands of Russia.

That’s NOT what she originally said.

She walked that back because it was such a blatant Kremlin talking point

 

[Lesh]

She claimed that it was an undeniable fact that Ukraine had US funded BIOWEAPONS LABS

https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.7382303

 

[LeroyDumonde]

She claimed that it was an undeniable fact that Ukraine had US funded BIOWEAPONS LABS

https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.7382303

Show me the video of her saying bioweapons labs.

 

[Luckyone]

And from this video YOU surmissed that Nuland said they had Bio weapons?

It was clear that she (Nuland) said that "they had been doing research on Bio weapons" but doing research does not mean that they were developing them. It means that there were doing research and that could mean research on HOW TO DEFEND THEMSELVES on the Bio weapons that the Russians evidently had.

In addition and in the same video you supplied, it was clearly stated that it was the Russians that were lying about all this stuff.

As such, the inference you made in your post is wrong. Or at least wrong from the point of view that Ukraine had no Bio weapons themselves.

 

[LeroyDumonde]

And from this video YOU surmissed that Nuland said they had Bio weapons?

I never claimed that she did. What I said was:

Victoria Nuland admitted that Ukraine has biolabs. These biolabs were funded by the United States thanks to Senator Obama in 2005.