Tulsi Gabbard needs to be the next POTUS nominee

She is for ( Choice ) ( Sensible Firearm Restrictions ) (Socialized Medicine ) ...
OK, those aren't "show-stoppers".
Choice needs to be a non-issue for Republicans
Sensible background checks are a good idea
Socialized medicine, like Obamacare? I don't see the GOP's medical plan?

So Tulsi looks acceptable to me, especially the disenchanted dem voters she'd bring with her.
 
She’s an opportunist. She is seducing money from the right via entertainment. She’s not a leader. Sounds right up your alley.
At least you didn't call her a Russian asset like Hillary called her.
She's not presidential timber, but she could fit into a GOP admin.
 
She has not Caucused with the Republicans so what does that indicate
There is no way if she is for real that she would be at peace with her own party if elected President. The left demands all politicians on Capitol Hill to vote near straight Prog agendas and issues. When she receives a Bill from them there will be a lot of Prog additions to it.
 
At least you didn't call her a Russian asset like Hillary called her.
She's not presidential timber, but she could fit into a GOP admin.
Anyone entertaining is available for a job in the GOP. That’s the quality sought. I bet Tucker gets a shot.
 
When Hannity asks about extremist groups he mentions BLM and referrers to the phrase "What do we want, dead cops, when do we want them, now".

Did BLM protesters actually scream that, or was it just Russian disinformationists?
It had to have been them thar Russinz. I've heard that my enture life and I'm 69.
 
A party could coalesce around her. It has happened elsewhere (France for example).
 
Because she's a Russian stooge who says that the US is no better than Putin. No wonder she's been drummed out of her party, but certain creeps on the right suddenly love her.

Russians stooge? LMAO.. OK, if that be the case then she would've sent the Russians classified US intelligence. She'd be in support of Russians invading Ukraine.
But none of that happened. So you're just following Hillary's lead with the Russian propaganda crap.

My interest in Tulsi is mainly her journey from left to to right. Democrats aren't allowed to publicly denounce their party's actions. She does this. Which means she's not a party loyalist. That's a good thing, regardless of which party you affiliate with.

A long time ago, I went from left to right. I'm enjoying watching her transition.
 
Last edited:
Tulsi Gabbard is the one who visited Assad isn't she?

She does not need to be president. We've had enough of the crazy.

She joined the military after 911 based on fabricated lies by our own government. So her trust in our own government, like many of us, was questionable. So she went straight to the source to find out the other side of the story.
"Trust, but verify" isn't a bad way of going about things.
 
Tulsi has enough likeability she might be able to beat just about any Republican nominated.

Of course I think she was only pulling something like 1-2% of the vote running in the democratic primary so I don't see her being the nominee in 2024 either.

That's because the DNC (who pays for their media coverage) won't allow the media to cover her very much. Because of the "disinformation" about her (like the Russian asset BS) she'll never be allowed to get more than 1-2%. This is how our two party system works. And why the media is what it is.

Fact is, we the people don't really have a say in who's elected. We're allowed to choose who the party leaders want us to choose from.
 
She’s an opportunist. She is seducing money from the right via entertainment. She’s not a leader. Sounds right up your alley.

How do you know she's not a leader? Because the DNC, the media and Hillary say so? Oh yeah, those are credible sources.

SMH
 
She is a typical federal supremacist. Only difference is she has integrity and thinks for herself.
While the 2nd sentence is refreshing, her authoritarian policies are not.
I would never vote for her but i do enjoy the way she triggers the left.
 
I’d vote for her.

She would pull enough support from the right that I would consider her a lock.
 
She is a typical federal supremacist. Only difference is she has integrity and thinks for herself.
While the 2nd sentence is refreshing, her authoritarian policies are not.
I would never vote for her but i do enjoy the way she triggers the left.
I don’t vote but might for her. It depends who she’s running against. It’s likely the duopoly will nominate fools, as they always do. She’d have to be a better choice.
 
You Putinsuckers should save your gaslighting for your fellow commies. Everyone else knows you're lying. Gabbard spreads Putin's propaganda.

Specifically, she recently pushed Putin's story about how US biolabs in Ukraine were justification for the Russian invasion. That is, she just lied outright for Putin. If you're a conservative, you'll see that as a resume-builder.
 
You Putinsuckers should save your gaslighting for your fellow commies. Everyone else knows you're lying. Gabbard spreads Putin's propaganda.

Specifically, she recently pushed Putin's story about how US biolabs in Ukraine were justification for the Russian invasion. That is, she just lied outright for Putin. If you're a conservative, you'll see that as a resume-builder.
Wow. That’s crazy.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom