Tulsi Gabbard Caught Changing Testimony on Iran at Last Minute

JimH52

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Messages
52,079
Reaction score
31,037
Points
2,645
Location
US
“I guess what I’m concerned about, one thing is, even in your printed testimony today … in your last paragraph on page six [it] says, ‘As a result of Operation Midnight Hammer, Iran’s nuclear enrichment program was obliterated. There has been no efforts to try to rebuild their enrichment capability,’” Warner read. “You omitted that paragraph from your oral opening. Was that because the president said there was a imminent threat two weeks [ago]?”

These people are not dedicated to the truth, the Constitution, or the country. They are dedicated to Donald Trump. They tow his line of lies. Nothing coming out of this White House can be taken as truth. All facts are twisted to fit trump's latest lie. trump comes up with a lie and them his staff have to come up with a way to defend his lie.
 
Things change. She is being honest.
The site wasn’t obliterated originally. It was a lie and failure. But since it was significantly damaged, there is no threat of nuclear weapons. So you guys lose twice because first you guys lied about obliterating it, and secondly, you went into Iran without an imminent threat.

So nothing changed. The site wasn’t obliterated and continued to be not obliterated. Also never an imminent threat.

Tell us what changed because you didn’t say what changed, because you’re full of shit.
 
She not changing her stances but rather commenting on things that did change
 
The site wasn’t obliterated originally. It was a lie and failure. But since it was significantly damaged, there is no threat of nuclear weapons. So you guys lose twice because first you guys lied about obliterating it, and secondly, you went into Iran without an imminent threat.

So nothing changed. The site wasn’t obliterated and continued to be not obliterated. Also never an imminent threat.

Tell us what changed because you didn’t say what changed, because you’re full of shit.
assuming/pretending that is all true and matters at all let me ask you something...so what? :abgg2q.jpg::26:
 
The site wasn’t obliterated originally. It was a lie and failure. But since it was significantly damaged, there is no threat of nuclear weapons. So you guys lose twice because first you guys lied about obliterating it, and secondly, you went into Iran without an imminent threat.

So nothing changed. The site wasn’t obliterated and continued to be not obliterated. Also never an imminent threat.

Tell us what changed because you didn’t say what changed, because you’re full of shit.
These people lie like they breathe.
 
Back
Top Bottom