Tucker Carlson Discusses Relentless Media Lies About Jan 6 Protests on Second Anniversary of Historic Day

ohgreatgooglymoogly now i know you know the story is all bullshit. If that isn't the most pathetic excuse for excusing a MURDERER..
A desperate group breaks into the capitol by physical force. Smashing barricades, windows and doors to gain entry. And when one of their number wearing a backpack is the first to try to climb through a shattered gallery window, past the hastily erected barricade, and into a gallery filled with congressmen.,

She wasn't there for their autographs.
 
7980D1D4-C91D-444B-9C3C-FA401C31AEEE.webp
 
George Floyd was peacefully surrendering and in handcuffs when he was killed

Ashli Babbitt was leading an angry mob to kill members of Congress and was killed after ignoring orders to stop
 
George Floyd was peacefully surrendering and in handcuffs when he was killed

Ashli Babbitt was leading an angry mob to kill members of Congress and was killed after ignoring orders to stop
keep believin' and repeatin' whatever you're told and you'll be safe for now.
 
keep believin' and repeatin' whatever you're told and you'll be safe for now.
It’s a fact Jack

Ashli was a thug trying to kill Congress Members
George Floyd was begging for his life
 
George Floyd was peacefully surrendering and in handcuffs when he was killed

Ashli Babbitt was leading an angry mob to kill members of Congress and was killed after ignoring orders to stop
You so silly! Good to see such a great sense of humor!

safe_image-S.gif
 
J6 UNselect committee doesn't want the truth. they want THEIR narrative of lies.

 
Everybody knows who is the real insurrectionist!

It's her, Piglosy. :mad:



m2himDE.jpg
 
Tucker is a true American patriot for exposing this.

thank you. I really needed a laugh today

thank you


read the whole story. But I believe you won't so here's a snippet

read U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion, leaning heavily on the arguments of Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "

She wrote: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."

Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable."

 
Once again Tucker is 100% correct.
really? Again?

LOL

read U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion, leaning heavily on the arguments of Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "

She wrote: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."

Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable."
 
exactly

read U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion, leaning heavily on the arguments of Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "

She wrote: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."

Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable."

 

Yeah a Judge says Tucker is full of it. Can't trust her either
read U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion, leaning heavily on the arguments of Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "

She wrote: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."

Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable."
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom