Tucker Carlson Discusses Relentless Media Lies About Jan 6 Protests on Second Anniversary of Historic Day

Feel free to point out where he is wrong.
Tucker?

"Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."

"Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."


Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable."


"Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."

Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable."

 
Just read U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion, leaning heavily on the arguments of Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "

 
Tucker?




"Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."

Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable."
Yes, Tucker.

So should be easy for you to watch the video and point out where he is wrong.
 
Tucker is a true American patriot for exposing this.

"Liar!"

LOL
 
546db0a4a0862766.png
Do you ever get tired of lying?
 
The link is trash, but more your response is the classic example of attacking the messenger instead of addressing the message.

Cuz you're a cowardly leftist.

When his own network says no one should believe him...........

The question becomes....why would you?
 
Tucker is a true American patriot for exposing this.

I think Maria Bartiromo probably has a secret crush on him except they're both married.

The greatest thing about them, and what scares their superiors the most is how much more they could be saying if they wanted to.

Either one of them could go podcast and compete online with Joe Rogan and whoever else easily.

Maria was a reporter at Ground Zero on 9/11 reporting explosions and all those videos have been removed since then
 
Tucker is a true American patriot for exposing this.


 
Here is a link to a journalist who was on the scene and actually followed Ray Epps as he led people over to the Capitol......Trump was still speaking when Epps did this....and this journalist followed him...he describes in his twitter feed how the Capitol police started the violence with the crowd outside, and he was also there when Babbit was murdered by the cop........the twitter feed is linked and shown in the article....


Published by The American Stinker???

Any evidence this guy is a REAL reporter, and not a liar who made all this shit up???? Didn't think so.

  • Overall, we rate the American Thinker, Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories/pseudoscience, use of poor sources, and several failed fact checks.
 
Published by The American Stinker???

Any evidence this guy is a REAL reporter, and not a liar who made all this shit up???? Didn't think so.

  • Overall, we rate the American Thinker, Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories/pseudoscience, use of poor sources, and several failed fact checks.
Mediabiasfactcheck is the poster child for questionable sources.
 
Published by The American Stinker???

Any evidence this guy is a REAL reporter, and not a liar who made all this shit up???? Didn't think so.

  • Overall, we rate the American Thinker, Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories/pseudoscience, use of poor sources, and several failed fact checks.
Typical far-left whining.

Now prove the FACTS presented are false. Go for it!
 

Yeah, about relying on the New York Times. How long too did they lie about Russian collusion?

EXCLUSIVE: They're as slow as Joe! Sleepy New York Times FINALLY wakes up and admits Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop IS REAL, a YEAR after DailyMail.com authenticated its contents and broke dozens of stories about his shady dealings

  • The New York Times admitted the contents of Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop are indeed authentic, in a report about his business dealings published this week
  • The Macbook Pro was recovered in October 2020 after the president's son left it at a repair shop in Wilmington, Delaware in April 2019 and never returned for it
  • When files from the device were first published ahead of the 2020 election, the NYT cast doubt on its provenance and linked it to Russian disinformation
  • On Wednesday, the paper changed its tune in an article referencing the files, which they confirmed 'were authenticated by people familiar with them'
  • Last March, DailyMail.com authenticated the laptop and was the first – and only – news organization to publicly verify its contents using expert analysis
  • DailyMail.com can also reveal that the Washington Post has had a copy of the laptop hard drive for over six months, but has failed to admit it or report on it
  • 'They haven't done anything. They're not just late to the party, they didn't even show up,' said Jack Maxey, a political activist who gave DailyMail.com the laptop
By JOSH BOSWELL FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 16:11 EST, 17 March 2022 | UPDATED: 00:46 EST, 19 March 2022

 

Forum List

Back
Top