John Edgar Slow Horses
Diamond Member
- Apr 11, 2023
- 53,995
- 25,135
- 2,488
- Banned
- #81
If anyone believes Trump, he is an idiot.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump's tax cut put $1700 back in my pocket each year. Thanks Don!![]()
/—-/ Side Piece has no ideas of her own that she can campaign on without revealing her true agenda, so she steals Trump’s.Now Kamala is copying Trump with no tax on tips... if anyone believes she will do this they are crazy... she is a ******* liar!!!
/—-/ Trump kept as many campaign promises as he could. More than any other president.If anyone believes Trump, he is an idiot.
Meaning what? the tax cuts didn't go far enough?At 8T smart butt. I saved a butt load, but beginning next year the middle class cuts go away.
Might as well. Tips are almost always underreported anyway. Regarding SS, we pay taxes on it when we pay in.People I spoke with today are liking Trump's idea to remove income tax from Social Security.... and of course the staff at the golf club loves the no tax on tips idea and they all said they think Kamala is lying when she says she wants that too...
If you make them permanent for the rich, then do so for the middle class. Yes?Meaning what? the tax cuts didn't go far enough?
You're pretending you didn't get that from my post. No?If you make them permanent for the rich, then do so for the middle class. Yes?
/—-/ Trump and the GOP tried but they needed Fem votes to make the required Super Majority.If you make them permanent for the rich, then do so for the middle class. Yes?
All of Trump's tax cuts go away, even for the rich. If elected Kamala will sacrifice the middle class to get at the rich.At 8T smart butt. I saved a butt load, but beginning next year the middle class cuts go away.
), some into lower. has creepy changed it? still waiting huh? your hypocrisy is so pronounced. debate me any day cuck!!!When Donald Trump came into office, he did so in an election that also gave Republicans a four-seat edge in the Senate and a whopping 47-seat advantage in the House. For two years, Republicans had nearly free rein to do whatever they wanted, and what they wanted was a massive tax cut for wealthy Americans and corporations.
Former Speaker of the House Paul Ryan sold the package as a “middle-class tax cut,” but the truth was the bill got rid of medical deductions used by millions of lower-income Americans to make room for massive corporate tax breaks. Ryan and other Republicans predicted that the tax cut would more than pay for itself, generating $1 trillion in economic growth. Trump called it “rocket fuel” for the economy.
The so-called “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” passed with only Republican votes in the House and Senate, and almost from the beginning, it was clear that the bill was not what they had claimed. More than 60% of the savings went to people at the top of the income ladder. Revenues fell even more than the Congressional Budget Office had predicted before the law passed. Republicans behind the bill were forced to admit that it might never pay off, and Ryan was left bragging about a school secretary who was “pleasantly surprised” by a $1.50 weekly raise.
And now, after six years, the National Bureau of Economic Research has completed the most detailed, in-depth analysis of the results of the Trump tax cut. And what the nonprofit found was what seemed obvious before the bill was passed: It may have stimulated some corporate growth, but it ballooned the debt while producing a fraction of predicted benefits.
![]()
Trump’s tax cut came up very short of promised benefits
When Donald Trump came into office, he did so in an election that also gave Republicans a four-seat edge in the Senate and a whopping 47-seat advantage in the House. For two years, Republicans had ...www.dailykos.com
There is no benefit. Imagine that.
Not at all. You do not write clearly.You're pretending you didn't get that from my post. No?
That would mean you are admitting you got it from my post. no?Not at all.
but we're both clear on what you said, no?You do not write clearly.