Zone1 Trumps Reveals at Charlie Kirk's Funeral "...I Hate My Opponents and Do Not Want the Best for Them"

This is who and what he is, and he has many behind him.

This isn't some radical nut on the street. This is the President of the United States.

We didn't think America was like this, but it appears that it is.
yea mac im sure biden and harris loves maga right?...geezus...
 
Hey I have a good idea! Let's allow secular progressive leftists to define what's Biblical and what's not Biblical."

Said no believer ever.
The mistakes you made were plentiful. Missing the fact that 50% of democrats are Christians. That I spent my whole life in it including being on the leadership board of Christian churches. And you never addressed my point which was his post using biblical ideas was un-Biblical. Turn the other cheek later, isnt a thing.
 
Hey I have a good idea! Let's allow secular progressive leftists to define what's Biblical and what's not Biblical."

Said no believer ever.
Citygator didn't define it. It's the Word, God defined it, you've chosen to ignore it..... he gave you free will to do just that.... It makes separating the Sheep from the Goats at the last judgement, easier for Him!



(Sparky, not for you.)
 
Trump was supposed to be giving a eulogy during the funeral of Charlie Kirk yet couldn't help making things about him.

Referring to Charlie Kirk Trump stated:
“He did not hate his opponents, he wanted the best for them,” Trump said, before breaking from his prepared remarks to add: “That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponents, and I don’t want the best for them, I’m sorry.”

Trump's word choice is very interesting--not "my enemies" but my "opponents". That could be half of the U.S. voting population.

Previously we could surmise that he was simply pursing the means to a particular end as he destroyed the infrastructure put in place via the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Fair Housing Act of 1968, etc. Yet Trump’s explicit declaration that he ‘hates his opponents and does not want the best for them’ moves the conversation from one of political strategy to one of avowed animus. This rhetorical shift underscores that dismantling civil-rights protections is not merely incidental but mayH be motivated by hostility toward groups those laws were designed to protect.

Also of note is that it is not actually accurate to claim that Kirk didn't hate his opponents and wanted the best for them. While I would not presume to state that Charlie Kirk hates anyone, he did publicly argue that Black women were “taking slots” away from white people, therefore he wasn’t really wishing the best for them at all. Even if he wrapped his rhetoric in language about merit or fairness, the underlying message is that opportunities for Black women are illegitimate or undeserved — which is a denial of what’s best for them.

Trump officials praise Charlie Kirk's faith and his mark on the conservative movement
He always makes it about himself. He was supposedly a good friend of Charlie but seems he just couldn't leave it at that.
 
That's because, you're in a cult.

Trump could kill your wives and rape your daughters, and his cult would twist themselves into pretzels, giving reasons why they must have deserved it.

Says the side that thinks women can have penises.
 
Half of the cabinet level administration knew Charlie Kirk personally. Vance, Bondi, Patel, Carr, Bongino, Hegseth, etc. They were friends.

Now all of them are ******* pissed off, big league.
 
Trump was supposed to be giving a eulogy during the funeral of Charlie Kirk yet couldn't help making things about him.

Referring to Charlie Kirk Trump stated:
“He did not hate his opponents, he wanted the best for them,” Trump said, before breaking from his prepared remarks to add: “That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponents, and I don’t want the best for them, I’m sorry.”

Trump's word choice is very interesting--not "my enemies" but my "opponents". That could be half of the U.S. voting population.

Previously we could surmise that he was simply pursing the means to a particular end as he destroyed the infrastructure put in place via the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Fair Housing Act of 1968, etc. Yet Trump’s explicit declaration that he ‘hates his opponents and does not want the best for them’ moves the conversation from one of political strategy to one of avowed animus. This rhetorical shift underscores that dismantling civil-rights protections is not merely incidental but may be motivated by hostility toward groups those laws were designed to protect.

Also of note is that it is not actually accurate to claim that Kirk didn't hate his opponents and wanted the best for them. While I would not presume to state that Charlie Kirk hates anyone, he did publicly argue that Black women were “taking slots” away from white people, therefore he wasn’t really wishing the best for them at all. Even if he wrapped his rhetoric in language about merit or fairness, the underlying message is that opportunities for Black women are illegitimate or undeserved — which is a denial of what’s best for them.

Trump officials praise Charlie Kirk's faith and his mark on the conservative movement
#metoo. Not everyone is as wonderful as Erika and Charlie!!!

Greg
 
He was the sort of guy who'd push racism, but in his own way.

I saw once a South African who said "I'm a racist, I don't kick black people, just like I don't kick my dogs, I treat black people well, just like I treat my dogs well, but I am superior to my dogs and black people".
Wrong. You loons only listen to cherry picked sound bites and then full stop. You either intentionally or ignorantly ignore the full context. Educate yourself or remain one of the sheep.

 
15th post
Wrong. You loons only listen to cherry picked sound bites and then full stop. You either intentionally or ignorantly ignore the full context. Educate yourself or remain one of the sheep.



Well, what a shit post that was.

You say "educate yourself", but clearly I'm not going to learn anything for you. Why? Because you don't have a ******* clue.
 
Trump was supposed to be giving a eulogy during the funeral of Charlie Kirk yet couldn't help making things about him.

Referring to Charlie Kirk Trump stated:
“He did not hate his opponents, he wanted the best for them,” Trump said, before breaking from his prepared remarks to add: “That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponents, and I don’t want the best for them, I’m sorry.”
I disagree with Trump on that.

But I do see how the left brought that hate on themselves.
 
Well, what a shit post that was.

You say "educate yourself", but clearly I'm not going to learn anything for you. Why? Because you don't have a ******* clue.
Didn't watch the video and so confident in your ignorance.
 
This is what Republicans and the America right voted for, hatred for the fellow Americans.

Then they want to pretend the political violence stems from the political left.

My ass it does!
 
Back
Top Bottom