Zone1 Trumps Reveals at Charlie Kirk's Funeral "...I Hate My Opponents and Do Not Want the Best for Them"

[frigidweirdo]

Didn't watch the video and so confident in your ignorance.

Did I come on here to have a conversation with a video? Nope.

If you want, you can take the points from the video you think are relevant, quote them, make your argument.

Or you can end this conversation.

 

[my2¢]

I never felt before the sense of a president's insecurity as I do with Trump.

 

[westwall]

Trump was supposed to be giving a eulogy during the funeral of Charlie Kirk yet couldn't help making things about him.

Referring to Charlie Kirk Trump stated:
“He did not hate his opponents, he wanted the best for them,” Trump said, before breaking from his prepared remarks to add: “That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponents, and I don’t want the best for them, I’m sorry.”

Trump's word choice is very interesting--not "my enemies" but my "opponents". That could be half of the U.S. voting population.

Previously we could surmise that he was simply pursing the means to a particular end as he destroyed the infrastructure put in place via the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Fair Housing Act of 1968, etc. Yet Trump’s explicit declaration that he ‘hates his opponents and does not want the best for them’ moves the conversation from one of political strategy to one of avowed animus. This rhetorical shift underscores that dismantling civil-rights protections is not merely incidental but may be motivated by hostility toward groups those laws were designed to protect.

Also of note is that it is not actually accurate to claim that Kirk didn't hate his opponents and wanted the best for them. While I would not presume to state that Charlie Kirk hates anyone, he did publicly argue that Black women were “taking slots” away from white people, therefore he wasn’t really wishing the best for them at all. Even if he wrapped his rhetoric in language about merit or fairness, the underlying message is that opportunities for Black women are illegitimate or undeserved — which is a denial of what’s best for them.

Trump officials praise Charlie Kirk's faith and his mark on the conservative movement

Good. I hate them too. They are the enemies, "domestic" our Founding Fathers warned us about.

They must be destroyed or America is doomed.

 

[sparky]

Referring to Charlie Kirk Trump stated:
“He did not hate his opponents, he wanted the best for them,” Trump said, before breaking from his prepared remarks to add: “That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponents, and I don’t want the best for them, I’m sorry.”

yes he did Mari

but this was after he explained (with many examples) how Charlie didn't hate his opponents , because fighting hate w/hate simply doesn't work

so what Trump was actually doing was pointing out he was not as big a man as Charlie

~S~

 

[HaShev]

Trump was supposed to be giving a eulogy during the funeral of Charlie Kirk yet couldn't help making things about him.

Referring to Charlie Kirk Trump stated:
“He did not hate his opponents, he wanted the best for them,” Trump said, before breaking from his prepared remarks to add: “That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponents, and I don’t want the best for them, I’m sorry.”

Trump's word choice is very interesting--not "my enemies" but my "opponents". That could be half of the U.S. voting population.

Previously we could surmise that he was simply pursing the means to a particular end as he destroyed the infrastructure put in place via the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Fair Housing Act of 1968, etc. Yet Trump’s explicit declaration that he ‘hates his opponents and does not want the best for them’ moves the conversation from one of political strategy to one of avowed animus. This rhetorical shift underscores that dismantling civil-rights protections is not merely incidental but may be motivated by hostility toward groups those laws were designed to protect.

Also of note is that it is not actually accurate to claim that Kirk didn't hate his opponents and wanted the best for them. While I would not presume to state that Charlie Kirk hates anyone, he did publicly argue that Black women were “taking slots” away from white people, therefore he wasn’t really wishing the best for them at all. Even if he wrapped his rhetoric in language about merit or fairness, the underlying message is that opportunities for Black women are illegitimate or undeserved — which is a denial of what’s best for them.

Trump officials praise Charlie Kirk's faith and his mark on the conservative movement

Context context context,
1)it was saying Charlie was more forgiving, perhaps naively as that mantra always gets the "better man" killed and evil to continue to reign.
2)It's not Trump witholding assistance or aid to opponents and their states like Dems did, context therefore is political resistance, sabotaging, lawfare, propagandist politicians and media and destructive activist orgs, not the voters.
If you equate all opposition party members then you are the one calling that whole party traitors to the country.

 

[citygator]

You don't make the connection?

Wow.

Not without a phd in maga talk. You guys don’t speak English as evident from Trump’s Tylenol speech.

 

[Correll]

Not without a phd in maga talk. You guys don’t speak English as evident from Trump’s Tylenol speech.

THink it though slowly,

The other conservative made the valid point that Trump has the right to be "hard noses" when it came to the vile left.

You challenged that as "un-biblical".


I posted a meme showing Trump's fighting spirit after he was SHOT, reminding everyone and you, that the "cheeks" that we have run out of, involved you lefties trying to murder Trump and actually murdering his friend.



My implication was to dismiss your shit talk about the bible, and to point out correctly that this is not a time for forgiveness but a time to fight evil.


ie you and yours.

 

[marvin martian]

Trump was supposed to be giving a eulogy during the funeral of Charlie Kirk yet couldn't help making things about him.

Referring to Charlie Kirk Trump stated:
“He did not hate his opponents, he wanted the best for them,” Trump said, before breaking from his prepared remarks to add: “That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponents, and I don’t want the best for them, I’m sorry.”

Trump's word choice is very interesting--not "my enemies" but my "opponents". That could be half of the U.S. voting population.

Previously we could surmise that he was simply pursing the means to a particular end as he destroyed the infrastructure put in place via the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Fair Housing Act of 1968, etc. Yet Trump’s explicit declaration that he ‘hates his opponents and does not want the best for them’ moves the conversation from one of political strategy to one of avowed animus. This rhetorical shift underscores that dismantling civil-rights protections is not merely incidental but may be motivated by hostility toward groups those laws were designed to protect.

Also of note is that it is not actually accurate to claim that Kirk didn't hate his opponents and wanted the best for them. While I would not presume to state that Charlie Kirk hates anyone, he did publicly argue that Black women were “taking slots” away from white people, therefore he wasn’t really wishing the best for them at all. Even if he wrapped his rhetoric in language about merit or fairness, the underlying message is that opportunities for Black women are illegitimate or undeserved — which is a denial of what’s best for them.

Trump officials praise Charlie Kirk's faith and his mark on the conservative movement

You probably shouldn't have shot him, huh?

 

[protectionist]

Except the guy who tried to assassinate him was a registered republican.

A staunch, radical LGBT leftist

 

[candycorn]

A staunch, radical LGBT leftist

Nope.

A registered republican.

 

[protectionist]

Nope.

A registered republican.

staunch, radical LGBT leftist.
Source ? his mother.
Fake news didnt tell you ? What a surprise .

 

[candycorn]

staunch, radical LGBT leftist.
Source ? his mother.
Fake news didnt tell you ? What a surprise .

The man who tried to kill Trump was a registered republican.

Hope that ruins what was already going to be a dreadful day for you.

 

[protectionist]

Trump was supposed to be giving a eulogy during the funeral of Charlie Kirk yet couldn't help making things about him.

Referring to Charlie Kirk Trump stated:
“He did not hate his opponents, he wanted the best for them,” Trump said, before breaking from his prepared remarks to add: “That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponents, and I don’t want the best for them, I’m sorry.”

Trump's word choice is very interesting--not "my enemies" but my "opponents". That could be half of the U.S. voting population.

Previously we could surmise that he was simply pursing the means to a particular end as he destroyed the infrastructure put in place via the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Fair Housing Act of 1968, etc. Yet Trump’s explicit declaration that he ‘hates his opponents and does not want the best for them’ moves the conversation from one of political strategy to one of avowed animus. This rhetorical shift underscores that dismantling civil-rights protections is not merely incidental but may be motivated by hostility toward groups those laws were designed to protect.

Also of note is that it is not actually accurate to claim that Kirk didn't hate his opponents and wanted the best for them. While I would not presume to state that Charlie Kirk hates anyone, he did publicly argue that Black women were “taking slots” away from white people, therefore he wasn’t really wishing the best for them at all. Even if he wrapped his rhetoric in language about merit or fairness, the underlying message is that opportunities for Black women are illegitimate or undeserved — which is a denial of what’s best for them.

Trump was supposed to be giving a eulogy during the funeral of Charlie Kirk yet couldn't help making things about him.

Referring to Charlie Kirk Trump stated:
“He did not hate his opponents, he wanted the best for them,” Trump said, before breaking from his prepared remarks to add: “That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponents, and I don’t want the best for them, I’m sorry.”

Trump's word choice is very interesting--not "my enemies" but my "opponents". That could be half of the U.S. voting population.

Previously we could surmise that he was simply pursing the means to a particular end as he destroyed the infrastructure put in place via the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Fair Housing Act of 1968, etc. Yet Trump’s explicit declaration that he ‘hates his opponents and does not want the best for them’ moves the conversation from one of political strategy to one of avowed animus. This rhetorical shift underscores that dismantling civil-rights protections is not merely incidental but may be motivated by hostility toward groups those laws were designed to protect.

Also of note is that it is not actually accurate to claim that Kirk didn't hate his opponents and wanted the best for them. While I would not presume to state that Charlie Kirk hates anyone, he did publicly argue that Black women were “taking slots” away from white people, therefore he wasn’t really wishing the best for them at all. Even if he wrapped his rhetoric in language about merit or fairness, the underlying message is that opportunities for Black women are illegitimate or undeserved — which is a denial of what’s best for them.

Trump officials praise Charlie Kirk's faith and his mark on the conservative movement

Opportunities for Black women ARE illegitimate & undeserved, when they come about through ILLEGAL & IMMORAL violations of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (aka DEI ; aka Affirmative Action)

DEI/AA has been “taking slots” away from white people, & therefore it SHOULDN't be wishing the best for them, under those illegal & immoral circumstances.

Those who perpetrate the crime of DEI/AA (ie. racial/sex discrimination are criminals, and shouldbe treated as such.

As for hating opponents. I would say that I also hate opponents of mine >
Criminals who attack innocent, young women on college campuses, and kill them (Laken Riley).
And maybe he's saying that he hates criminals who attack innocent, young women on jogging trails, and kill them (Rachel Morin).
And maybe he's saying that he hates a criminal (who is also an illegal alien) who sets an innocent, young woman on fire in a subway car, burning her to death. (Debrina Kawam)
And maybe he's saying that he hates criminals (illegal aliens too) who attack an innocent, 12 year old girl, rape & kill her (Jocelyn Nungaray).
And maybe he hates DAs like Alvin Bragg who let a bunch of illegal dirtbags go back out on the street, after they ganged up on 2 New York cops, punching & kicking them, only to have the creeps walk free, flipping the finger to the press camera, & then disappear to California.
Maybe he hates the gang looters who take advantage of rogue prosecutors, who don't prosecute.
Maybe he hates the cartel scum who have killed more young Americans in one year with Fentanyl, than who died in 15 years of the Vietnam War.

So it looks like he has one hell of a "Me Too" movement going on. Got him re-elected.

 

[Correll]

The man who tried to kill Trump was a registered republican.

Hope that ruins what was already going to be a dreadful day for you.

no one is falling for this shit. You know that right?

Take the L. It will make you look less pathetic.

 

[protectionist]

The man who tried to kill Trump was a registered republican.

Hope that ruins what was already going to be a dreadful day for you.

Doesnt matter what his registration was. Registrations go back years.
In 2025, Robinson was a loongoon, flaming leftist, and his own mother testified it to the FBI and press.
I'm sure that ruins YOUR day.

 

[Blaster]

The man who tried to kill Trump was a registered republican.

Hope that ruins what was already going to be a dreadful day for you.

He was really a Democrat stupid.

 

[Rawley]

Trump was supposed to be giving a eulogy during the funeral of Charlie Kirk yet couldn't help making things about him.

Referring to Charlie Kirk Trump stated:
“He did not hate his opponents, he wanted the best for them,” Trump said, before breaking from his prepared remarks to add: “That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponents, and I don’t want the best for them, I’m sorry.”

Well, two of his opponents tried to assassinate him.

 

[candycorn]

no one is falling for this shit. You know that right?

Take the L. It will make you look less pathetic.

The man who tried to kill Trump was a registered republican.

Your acceptance of this fact is not required for it to be true.

 

[candycorn]

Doesnt matter what his registration was. Registrations go back years.
In 2025, Robinson was a loongoon, flaming leftist, and his own mother testified it to the FBI and press.
I'm sure that ruins YOUR day.

The man who tried to kill Trump was a registered republican. Registered republicans are not democrats or the “left"

Your acceptance of this fact is not required for it to be true.

 

[Correll]

The man who tried to kill Trump was a registered republican.

Your acceptance of this fact is not required for it to be true.

I understand. YOU realize that your window is closing. If you don't manage to seize control of hte narrative, and Trump succeeds,

then MAGA will be the new normal for generations.


So you are desperate.