Zone1 Trumps Reveals at Charlie Kirk's Funeral "...I Hate My Opponents and Do Not Want the Best for Them"

[candycorn]

I understand. YOU realize that your window is closing. If you don't manage to seize control of hte narrative, and Trump succeeds,

then MAGA will be the new normal for generations.


So you are desperate.

You seem desperate to not want to acknowledge Trump’s would be assassin was one of you.

 

[protectionist]

The man who tried to kill Trump was a registered republican. Registered republicans are not democrats or the “left"

Your acceptance of this fact is not required for it to be true.

Another example of the derangement of the left. I've said as much as is needed to be said.
It's common for those onthe left to construct things to be how they WANT them to be.

 

[Correll]

You seem desperate to not want to acknowledge Trump’s would be assassin was one of you.

I'm certainly not interested in helping you craft a false narrative of what is happening so that you can resume destroying this nation.


Your side's support of political violence is FINALLY seems to have a political cost.

And at the best possible time.

So, that's a good thing.

 

[candycorn]

Another example of the derangement of the left. I've said as much as is needed to be said.
It's common for those onthe left to construct things to be how they WANT them to be.

Trump’s wouldbe assassin was a registered republican.

do with that what you will. No amount of cartoonish histrionics from you will change that. Perhaps you should try to sue him too.

 

[candycorn]

I'm certainly not interested in helping you craft a false narrative of what is happening so that you can resume destroying this nation.


Your side's support of political violence is FINALLY seems to have a political cost.

And at the best possible time.

So, that's a good thing.

Then it’s a good thing that you and your fellow registered republicans are more apt to shoot Trump than democrats or the left.

Those are the facts...now back to whatever spin you’re taking part in.

 

[protectionist]

You seem desperate to not want to acknowledge Trump’s would be assassin was one of you.

( Trump’s would be assassin)..........Uh, who are you talking about ?

 

[Correll]

Another example of the derangement of the left. I've said as much as is needed to be said.
It's common for those onthe left to construct things to be how they WANT them to be.

Their only hope is to LIE, like they have never lied before, and try to TRICK people into giving them the power in the midterms to sabotage Trump's policies.


THey KNOW that if Trump has a chance, he will make america great again, and that is the end of their leftard dreams.


you think they are bad now? Wait till they lose the mid terms.

 

[Meathead]

Trump was supposed to be giving a eulogy during the funeral of Charlie Kirk yet couldn't help making things about him.

Referring to Charlie Kirk Trump stated:
“He did not hate his opponents, he wanted the best for them,” Trump said, before breaking from his prepared remarks to add: “That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponents, and I don’t want the best for them, I’m sorry.”

Trump's word choice is very interesting--not "my enemies" but my "opponents". That could be half of the U.S. voting population.

Previously we could surmise that he was simply pursing the means to a particular end as he destroyed the infrastructure put in place via the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Fair Housing Act of 1968, etc. Yet Trump’s explicit declaration that he ‘hates his opponents and does not want the best for them’ moves the conversation from one of political strategy to one of avowed animus. This rhetorical shift underscores that dismantling civil-rights protections is not merely incidental but may be motivated by hostility toward groups those laws were designed to protect.

Also of note is that it is not actually accurate to claim that Kirk didn't hate his opponents and wanted the best for them. While I would not presume to state that Charlie Kirk hates anyone, he did publicly argue that Black women were “taking slots” away from white people, therefore he wasn’t really wishing the best for them at all. Even if he wrapped his rhetoric in language about merit or fairness, the underlying message is that opportunities for Black women are illegitimate or undeserved — which is a denial of what’s best for them.

Trump officials praise Charlie Kirk's faith and his mark on the conservative movement

So?

 

[protectionist]

Then it’s a good thing that you and your fellow registered republicans are more apt to shoot Trump than democrats or the left.

Those are the facts...now back to whatever spin you’re taking part in.

You coud convince maybe 6 people of that ? Maybe 8 ? You think ?

 

[Unkotare]

Obviously, Trump was trying to point out that Kirk was of higher character than himself. Self-deprecation often goes over the heads of dimwits.

 

[protectionist]

Trump’s wouldbe assassin was a registered republican.

do with that what you will. No amount of cartoonish histrionics from you will change that. Perhaps you should try to sue him too.

I already addressed the pointless idea of him being a RR.
And supplied the REAL description of him - from his own MOTHER. Ho hum.

Hmm. That court suit thing seems to stay with you. Triggered. What will it be like when the court date actually arrives. Pheeeew!

 

[Meathead]

Then it’s a good thing that you and your fellow registered republicans are more apt to shoot Trump than democrats or the left.

You're bonkers.

 

[candycorn]

Their only hope is to LIE, like they have never lied before, and try to TRICK people into giving them the power in the midterms to sabotage Trump's policies.


THey KNOW that if Trump has a chance, he will make america great again, and that is the end of their leftard dreams.


you think they are bad now? Wait till they lose the mid terms.

Its not a lie...trump’s would be assassin was a registered republican....just like you.

 

[candycorn]

I already addressed the pointless idea of him being a RR.
And supplied the REAL description of him - from his own MOTHER. Ho hum.

Hmm. That court suit thing seems to stay with you. Triggered. What will it be like when the court date actually arrives. Pheeeew!

You coud convince maybe 6 people of that ? Maybe 8 ? You think ?

( Trump’s would be assassin)..........Uh, who are you talking about ?

Not sure what any of that means. The fact remains that Trump’s would-be assassin was a registered republican.

 

[protectionist]

Not sure what any of that means. The fact remains that Trump’s would-be assassin was a registered republican.

Don't feed the trolls.

 

[Correll]

Its not a lie...trump’s would be assassin was a registered republican....just like you.

Paper does not define reality. Your shooter was YOURS.

This escalation of violence is yours. Much like all of them are.


Luckily for you, once again, we are NOT matching you, tit for tat.

BUt we will continue to crush you ever more mercilessly, politically, legally and morally.

 

[candycorn]

Paper does not define reality.

Yes it actually does.

Your shooter was YOURS.

Nope. He was a registered republican...just like you.

You’ve long since bored me. **** off.

 

[candycorn]

Don't feed the trolls.

Good idea...

Now go waddle down to the waterfront and wonder where your next meal is coming from.

 

[Correll]

Yes it actually does.

No, it doesn't.

Nope. He was a registered republican...just like you.

You’ve long since bored me. **** off.

Said the lefty. Lefty like the shooter.

 

[Frankenstein]

Trump was supposed to be giving a eulogy during the funeral of Charlie Kirk yet couldn't help making things about him.

Referring to Charlie Kirk Trump stated:
“He did not hate his opponents, he wanted the best for them,” Trump said, before breaking from his prepared remarks to add: “That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponents, and I don’t want the best for them, I’m sorry.”

Trump's word choice is very interesting--not "my enemies" but my "opponents". That could be half of the U.S. voting population.

Previously we could surmise that he was simply pursing the means to a particular end as he destroyed the infrastructure put in place via the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Fair Housing Act of 1968, etc. Yet Trump’s explicit declaration that he ‘hates his opponents and does not want the best for them’ moves the conversation from one of political strategy to one of avowed animus. This rhetorical shift underscores that dismantling civil-rights protections is not merely incidental but may be motivated by hostility toward groups those laws were designed to protect.

Also of note is that it is not actually accurate to claim that Kirk didn't hate his opponents and wanted the best for them. While I would not presume to state that Charlie Kirk hates anyone, he did publicly argue that Black women were “taking slots” away from white people, therefore he wasn’t really wishing the best for them at all. Even if he wrapped his rhetoric in language about merit or fairness, the underlying message is that opportunities for Black women are illegitimate or undeserved — which is a denial of what’s best for them.

Trump officials praise Charlie Kirk's faith and his mark on the conservative movement

I too despise demonic people who reside in the democrat party, but I pray for them!