Zone1 Trumps Reveals at Charlie Kirk's Funeral "...I Hate My Opponents and Do Not Want the Best for Them"

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Trump was supposed to be giving a eulogy during the funeral of Charlie Kirk yet couldn't help making things about him.

Referring to Charlie Kirk Trump stated:
“He did not hate his opponents, he wanted the best for them,” Trump said, before breaking from his prepared remarks to add: “That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponents, and I don’t want the best for them, I’m sorry.”

Trump's word choice is very interesting--not "my enemies" but my "opponents". That could be half of the U.S. voting population.

Previously we could surmise that he was simply pursing the means to a particular end as he destroyed the infrastructure put in place via the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Fair Housing Act of 1968, etc. Yet Trump’s explicit declaration that he ‘hates his opponents and does not want the best for them’ moves the conversation from one of political strategy to one of avowed animus. This rhetorical shift underscores that dismantling civil-rights protections is not merely incidental but may be motivated by hostility toward groups those laws were designed to protect.

Also of note is that it is not actually accurate to claim that Kirk didn't hate his opponents and wanted the best for them. While I would not presume to state that Charlie Kirk hates anyone, he did publicly argue that Black women were “taking slots” away from white people, therefore he wasn’t really wishing the best for them at all. Even if he wrapped his rhetoric in language about merit or fairness, the underlying message is that opportunities for Black women are illegitimate or undeserved — which is a denial of what’s best for them.

Trump officials praise Charlie Kirk's faith and his mark on the conservative movement

 

[Mac1958]

I hate my opponents, and I don’t want the best for them, I’m sorry.”

Trump's word choice is very interesting--not "my enemies" but my "opponents". That could be half of the U.S. voting population.

This is who and what he is, and he has many behind him.

This isn't some radical nut on the street. This is the President of the United States.

We didn't think America was like this, but it appears that it is.

 

[sparky]

Trump's word choice is very interesting--not "my enemies" but my "opponents". That could be half of the U.S. voting population.

i wouldn't want 'the best' for those who wanted to assassinate me either.....~S~

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Trump was supposed to be giving a eulogy during the funeral of Charlie Kirk yet couldn't help making things about him.

Referring to Charlie Kirk Trump stated:
“He did not hate his opponents, he wanted the best for them,” Trump said, before breaking from his prepared remarks to add: “That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponents, and I don’t want the best for them, I’m sorry.”

Trump's word choice is very interesting--not "my enemies" but my "opponents". That could be half of the U.S. voting population.

Previously we could surmise that he was simply pursing the means to a particular end as he destroyed the infrastructure put in place via the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Fair Housing Act of 1968, etc. Yet Trump’s explicit declaration that he ‘hates his opponents and does not want the best for them’ moves the conversation from one of political strategy to one of avowed animus. This rhetorical shift underscores that dismantling civil-rights protections is not merely incidental but may be motivated by hostility toward groups those laws were designed to protect.

Also of note is that it is not actually accurate to claim that Kirk didn't hate his opponents and wanted the best for them. While I would not presume to state that Charlie Kirk hates anyone, he did publicly argue that Black women were “taking slots” away from white people, therefore he wasn’t really wishing the best for them at all. Even if he wrapped his rhetoric in language about merit or fairness, the underlying message is that opportunities for Black women are illegitimate or undeserved — which is a denial of what’s best for them.

Trump officials praise Charlie Kirk's faith and his mark on the conservative movement

What a load of bullshit. Mr Kirk stated many times that choices should not be made based on skin color. So much for content of character.

Just more of the same garbage trying to pull racism directly out of your asses.

 

[JGalt]

Trump was supposed to be giving a eulogy during the funeral of Charlie Kirk yet couldn't help making things about him.

Referring to Charlie Kirk Trump stated:
“He did not hate his opponents, he wanted the best for them,” Trump said, before breaking from his prepared remarks to add: “That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponents, and I don’t want the best for them, I’m sorry.”

Trump's word choice is very interesting--not "my enemies" but my "opponents". That could be half of the U.S. voting population.

Previously we could surmise that he was simply pursing the means to a particular end as he destroyed the infrastructure put in place via the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Fair Housing Act of 1968, etc. Yet Trump’s explicit declaration that he ‘hates his opponents and does not want the best for them’ moves the conversation from one of political strategy to one of avowed animus. This rhetorical shift underscores that dismantling civil-rights protections is not merely incidental but may be motivated by hostility toward groups those laws were designed to protect.

Also of note is that it is not actually accurate to claim that Kirk didn't hate his opponents and wanted the best for them. While I would not presume to state that Charlie Kirk hates anyone, he did publicly argue that Black women were “taking slots” away from white people, therefore he wasn’t really wishing the best for them at all. Even if he wrapped his rhetoric in language about merit or fairness, the underlying message is that opportunities for Black women are illegitimate or undeserved — which is a denial of what’s best for them.

Trump officials praise Charlie Kirk's faith and his mark on the conservative movement

Well maybe this should be a lesson for you Trump-haters to tuck in your tails and not **** with him.

I heard he once stood in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shot somebody, and didn't lose a single voter.

 

[Dorian Mode]

If anyone deserves to hate the democraps and the RINOS, it's Trump. For 9 years they have viciously harassed him and even tried to kill him a few times. Trump has shown remarkable restraint. His opponents haven't. The 19% neo-leftists have been on a crusade to get Trump and 81% of the country to hate the neo-left, and then they whine when the majority of the people do. You reap what you sow.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Well maybe this should be a lesson for you Trump-haters to tuck in your tails and not **** with him.

I heard he once stood in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shot somebody, and didn't lose a single voter.

That's because, you're in a cult.

Trump could kill your wives and rape your daughters, and his cult would twist themselves into pretzels, giving reasons why they must have deserved it.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Trump was supposed to be giving a eulogy during the funeral of Charlie Kirk yet couldn't help making things about him.

Referring to Charlie Kirk Trump stated:
“He did not hate his opponents, he wanted the best for them,” Trump said, before breaking from his prepared remarks to add: “That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponents, and I don’t want the best for them, I’m sorry.”

Trump's word choice is very interesting--not "my enemies" but my "opponents". That could be half of the U.S. voting population.

Previously we could surmise that he was simply pursing the means to a particular end as he destroyed the infrastructure put in place via the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Fair Housing Act of 1968, etc. Yet Trump’s explicit declaration that he ‘hates his opponents and does not want the best for them’ moves the conversation from one of political strategy to one of avowed animus. This rhetorical shift underscores that dismantling civil-rights protections is not merely incidental but may be motivated by hostility toward groups those laws were designed to protect.

Also of note is that it is not actually accurate to claim that Kirk didn't hate his opponents and wanted the best for them. While I would not presume to state that Charlie Kirk hates anyone, he did publicly argue that Black women were “taking slots” away from white people, therefore he wasn’t really wishing the best for them at all. Even if he wrapped his rhetoric in language about merit or fairness, the underlying message is that opportunities for Black women are illegitimate or undeserved — which is a denial of what’s best for them.

Trump officials praise Charlie Kirk's faith and his mark on the conservative movement

What is truly wrong with Trump?


People have attacked "the left" or "some on the left" (usually the former) and being disrespectful to Kirk, but that comment, at someone's funeral, like on TV, if just ridiculous. And no doubt his supporters will love it because they too HATE at lot.

 

[Correll]

Trump was supposed to be giving a eulogy during the funeral of Charlie Kirk yet couldn't help making things about him.

Referring to Charlie Kirk Trump stated:
“He did not hate his opponents, he wanted the best for them,” Trump said, before breaking from his prepared remarks to add: “That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponents, and I don’t want the best for them, I’m sorry.”

Trump's word choice is very interesting--not "my enemies" but my "opponents". That could be half of the U.S. voting population.

Previously we could surmise that he was simply pursing the means to a particular end as he destroyed the infrastructure put in place via the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Fair Housing Act of 1968, etc. Yet Trump’s explicit declaration that he ‘hates his opponents and does not want the best for them’ moves the conversation from one of political strategy to one of avowed animus. This rhetorical shift underscores that dismantling civil-rights protections is not merely incidental but may be motivated by hostility toward groups those laws were designed to protect.

Also of note is that it is not actually accurate to claim that Kirk didn't hate his opponents and wanted the best for them. While I would not presume to state that Charlie Kirk hates anyone, he did publicly argue that Black women were “taking slots” away from white people, therefore he wasn’t really wishing the best for them at all. Even if he wrapped his rhetoric in language about merit or fairness, the underlying message is that opportunities for Black women are illegitimate or undeserved — which is a denial of what’s best for them.

Trump officials praise Charlie Kirk's faith and his mark on the conservative movement

It is telling that in the bit where you tell us what Kirk says, you quote TWO words from him, and then you tell us what he meant, instead of giving us say, two or three sentences from him so we could see ourselves.

Speaking for Kirk, and maga, when we complain about anti-white discrimination, our goal is to end anti-white discrimination.

That in no way implies that we wish non-whites ILL.

That was shit you made up. Kirk never said anything to support that conclusion.

 

[frigidweirdo]

What a load of bullshit. Mr Kirk stated many times that choices should not be made based on skin color. So much for content of character.

Just more of the same garbage trying to pull racism directly out of your asses.

He was the sort of guy who'd push racism, but in his own way.

I saw once a South African who said "I'm a racist, I don't kick black people, just like I don't kick my dogs, I treat black people well, just like I treat my dogs well, but I am superior to my dogs and black people".

 

[Correll]

He was the sort of guy who'd push racism, but in his own way.

I saw once a South African who said "I'm a racist, I don't kick black people, just like I don't kick my dogs, I treat black people well, just like I treat my dogs well, but I am superior to my dogs and black people".

Being against anti-white discrimination is not evidence of being for anti-black discrimination.

You are talking shit.

 

[Dorian Mode]

Being against anti-white discrimination is not evidence of being for anti-black discrimination.

You are talking shit.

The race-obsessed SJWs screaming about racism in everything they see are the people who are creating and perpetuating racism. They want everyone to hate minorities, especially the black community. That is why they push the boundaries with anti-white racism. It's just to create and promote hate for the black community. These race-obsessed SJWs are the true racists. Everyone else desperately wants to move on and unite as Americans, but these race-obsessed SJWs won't let us.

 

[JGalt]

He was the sort of guy who'd push racism, but in his own way.

I saw once a South African who said "I'm a racist, I don't kick black people, just like I don't kick my dogs, I treat black people well, just like I treat my dogs well, but I am superior to my dogs and black people".

Can you cite any instances of something he said that would be construed as "racist"?

In 2020, he called George Floyd a "scumbag." So how is that not true? George Floyd was a scumbag who committed home invasions and once pointed a loaded pistol at a pregnant woman's belly. He died while resisting arrest.

In 2023 Kirk said "prowling blacks go around for fun to go target white people", referring to the knockout games that were happening in NYC. Did those things not happen?

In one of his podcasts, Kirk said "If I see a black pilot, I'm going to be like, boy, I hope he's qualified." Meanwhile, former FOX News employee Juan Williams was fired from NPR for saying that seeing any Muslims on a plane makes him nervous. So how is that not "racist"?

 

[Votto]

I ******* hate Trump. . .

Except for when I see leftardz triggered by him, that is.

They are a match made in heaven, aren't they.

 

[Votto]

Trump was supposed to be giving a eulogy during the funeral of Charlie Kirk yet couldn't help making things about him.

Referring to Charlie Kirk Trump stated:
“He did not hate his opponents, he wanted the best for them,” Trump said, before breaking from his prepared remarks to add: “That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponents, and I don’t want the best for them, I’m sorry.”

Trump's word choice is very interesting--not "my enemies" but my "opponents". That could be half of the U.S. voting population.

Previously we could surmise that he was simply pursing the means to a particular end as he destroyed the infrastructure put in place via the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Fair Housing Act of 1968, etc. Yet Trump’s explicit declaration that he ‘hates his opponents and does not want the best for them’ moves the conversation from one of political strategy to one of avowed animus. This rhetorical shift underscores that dismantling civil-rights protections is not merely incidental but may be motivated by hostility toward groups those laws were designed to protect.

Also of note is that it is not actually accurate to claim that Kirk didn't hate his opponents and wanted the best for them. While I would not presume to state that Charlie Kirk hates anyone, he did publicly argue that Black women were “taking slots” away from white people, therefore he wasn’t really wishing the best for them at all. Even if he wrapped his rhetoric in language about merit or fairness, the underlying message is that opportunities for Black women are illegitimate or undeserved — which is a denial of what’s best for them.

Trump officials praise Charlie Kirk's faith and his mark on the conservative movement

Wow, you were able to get your shots in on Trump as well as defile the memory of a man you helped murder, all in the same breath.

Very impressive.

All I can say is, I cannot envision anyone on the Left getting up there after their loved one had been assassinated and say that you forgave them. This was Charlie, and this is his wife who married him.

As for Trump, I don't view him as a Christian. The natural reaction is the reaction Trump gave. The supernatural reaction is the one his wife gave.

Deal with it.

 

[1srelluc]

I think he has a right to be a bit more hard-nosed when it comes to forgiveness where the vile dems are concerned.

There comes a time when you run out of cheeks to turn.

 

[citygator]

I think he has a right to be a bit more hard-nosed when it comes to forgiveness where the vile dems are concerned.

There comes a time when you run out of cheeks to turn.

Ridiculously un-Biblical statement.

 

[Correll]

Ridiculously un-Biblical statement.

 

[citygator]

View attachment 1164949

OMG.. .not a disconnected unrelated random meme!

 

[1srelluc]

Ridiculously un-Biblical statement.

Well thank you.....I try.