Texas Teacher's Union sues over Kirk-related speech investigations!

The difference is I don't worry about it, because I am not around any and it doesn't affect me.
I was just nuking your contention that the right are the ones always talking about homosexuals. The left does it too, despite claiming to be pro-homosexual.
 

Good for them!!! Kirk lovers want to present him as another deity blessed by the No 1 deity, Donald Trump. However, he was a rabble rouser and proponent of hate speech of the first degree. His cult members would protest loudly if any efforts had been made to silence him and take away his precious 1st Amendment rights. But they have no qualms about silencing teachers and others who speak out honestly about Kirk's sewer tainted speeches.

The 1st Amendment applies to all Americans, even idiots like Kirk, who took advantage of the freedom it imposes to spew his moronic nonsense to young impressionable minds.

Bigly!!!
You loons couldn't win a debate with him. So you hated him, and one of you loons murdered him.
 

Good for them!!! Kirk lovers want to present him as another deity blessed by the No 1 deity, Donald Trump. However, he was a rabble rouser and proponent of hate speech of the first degree. His cult members would protest loudly if any efforts had been made to silence him and take away his precious 1st Amendment rights. But they have no qualms about silencing teachers and others who speak out honestly about Kirk's sewer tainted speeches.

The 1st Amendment applies to all Americans, even idiots like Kirk, who took advantage of the freedom it imposes to spew his moronic nonsense to young impressionable minds.

Bigly!!!
Right you can get a personal pardon from POTUS himself for smuggling countless tons of cocaine into the country but god forbid some small town school teacher tell the truth about a man who lived and died as a POS.
 
You loons couldn't win a debate with him. So you hated him, and one of you loons murdered him.
Kirk was a halfwit who couldn't win an honest debate. Thats why he preyed on children with selective editing to create content for fellow morons.
 
Right you can get a personal pardon from POTUS himself for smuggling countless tons of cocaine into the country but god forbid some small town school teacher tell the truth about a man who lived and died as a POS.
He had more integrity in his little finger than you have in your entire useless body.
 
Kirk was a halfwit who couldn't win an honest debate. Thats why he preyed on children with selective editing to create content for fellow morons.
Those "children" were adults who had somebody paying upwards of 6 figures in order for them to get smarts, yet they couldn't straight up debate someone who did not spend the money to get a degree. Maybe they could get a refund on their tuition money.
 
Last edited:
Those "children" were adults who had somebody paying upwards of 6 figures in order for them to get smarts, yet they couldn't straight up debate someone who did not spend the money to get a degree.
Because it wasn't honest debate. It was polished charlatan tactics against young people who were not experienced enough to recognize and dispatch them, then selective editing to create content for fellow, bigoted, low IQ twats.

I know Kirk was the stupid person's idea of a smart person. Sorry, but he was a dipshit.
 
What does Trump think?

1000007132.webp
 
15th post
Because it wasn't honest debate. It was polished charlatan tactics against young people who were not experienced enough to recognize and dispatch them, then selective editing to create content for fellow, bigoted, low IQ twats.

I know Kirk was the stupid person's idea of a smart person. Sorry, but he was a dipshit.
Who consistently ran rings around the supposed best and brightest of young adults.
 
Who consistently ran rings around the supposed best and brightest of young adults.
If you're a moron who doesnt know any better.

Charlie kirk couldn't win an honest debate. He simply used charlatan's tactics and fallacy. He knew his target audience doesn't know any better.

As you are showing me.
 
If you're a moron who doesnt know any better.

Charlie kirk couldn't win an honest debate. He simply used charlatan's tactics and fallacy. He knew his target audience doesn't know any better.

As you are showing me.
Then why didn't any of the bright adult students publish videos of them running circles around the uneducated Kirk? They're spending 6 figures to get smarts, after all. Maybe they can get a refund?
 
Back
Top Bottom