Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Booting someone off twatter is taking away free speech according to you retardsMusk didnt take away his right to free speech, he booted him off Twitter. I dont remember you sticking up for Trump when he was banned, so how about you take your child-like angle and go kick rocks.![]()
Ringing endorsementHe's the best convicted felon for the job.
Booting someone for a difference of opinion is definitely a 1st Amendment violation, but booting someone for doxxing is not. Come on man, you can squeeze a little more critical thinking out of that 70 IQ of yours.Booting someone off twatter is taking away free speech according to you retards
It is incredible how Trump is going after corruption when he himself has been proven guilty of corruption.
Trump's University and Trump's Charity to name a few.
FBI Agents' Lawsuit Against Trump 'Harbinger' of Legal Battles: Attorney
It wasn't true and it wasn't within the rules.Your side was posting the disinformation while banning our true information.
Is "doxxing" illegal?but booting someone for doxxing is not
Not hatred.It is unthinkable how Americans could be against stopping the TRILLIONS of dollars of our wasted taxpayer money purely because of their irrational hatred of Trump and Musk. This is induced mental illness.
No, you guys banned us for saying masks dont work, the vaccine isnt 100% safe, Wuhan lab leak, etc, etc, etc.It wasn't true and it wasn't within the rules.
The Wired article was all true. It didn't doxx anyone.
The Hunter Biden laptop story was doxxing.
It was your retards doing it, fool.Booting someone off twatter is taking away free speech according to you retards
You were banned because you said the vaccine was a bio weapon which contained nanobots and made you magnetic.No, you guys banned us for saying masks dont work, the vaccine isnt 100% safe, Wuhan lab leak, etc, etc, etc.![]()
The website rules. Has nothing to do with congressWhat rules?
It was Biden.The website rules. Has nothing to do with congress
Biden doesn't own Twitter, silly.It was Biden.
Ive never even heard of that, but why the fuck would you want to ban someone for posting it? Flat Earthers are annoying as fuck, but why would we ban them?You were banned because you said the vaccine was a bio weapon which contained nanobots and made you magnetic.
People died because they believed disinformation on Twitter. If I owned Twitter, I wouldn't want to be partially responsible for their deaths.Ive never even heard of that, but why the fuck would you want to ban someone for posting it? Flat Earthers are annoying as fuck, but why would we ban them?
It sure would be nice if democrats went back to supporting free speech.
Everyone that previously worked there had a red phone to the oval.Biden doesn't own Twitter, silly.
People die doing selfies. Are we going to ban selfies in high places? What is wrong with your brain? Why do i need to walk you through this obvious pitfall?People died because they believed disinformation on Twitter. If I owned Twitter, I wouldn't want to be partially responsible for their deaths.
Your commitment to "free speech" turns out to be a lie because you support Musk censoring Wired.