Trumpette's, avert your eyes. Senate Intel report confirms Russia aimed to help Trump in 2016

[AzogtheDefiler]

Mueller told AG Barr his four-page memo that exonerated Trump from collusion and obstruction caused 'confusion' and did NOT capture the 'context, nature and substance' of his detailed report

Mueller complained that Barr's conclusions didn't capture his report

Special counsel Robert Mueller reportedly wrote a letter to Attorney General William Barr complaining that his memo to Congress exonerating Trump of Russian collusion did not fully capture his report.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Mic drop.

Daily Mail is fake news. Find a WSJ article that corroborates your claims. Until then STFU, you Palestinian troll.

• Politics

Mueller Objected to Barr’s Summary of Report
Special counsel said attorney general ‘did not fully capture the context, nature and substance’ of findings on Trump and Russia


Mueller Objected to Barr’s Summary of Report

Let us know how you "fully capture" a report that is hundreds of pages in a 5 page summary.

well duh.... that 'summary' wasn't asked for nor wanted - - - but billy boy took it upon himself to do just that weeks b4 mueller was allowed to release his in depth report.

all barr had to do was petition the court & in the 'nest interest' of the public - it would have been released unredacted.

so save your flawed logic - it doesn't square.

1. Mueller didn't release anything. He had no authority to release anything. He worked for Barr, and was required by law to submit his report to the DOJ. After that, his job was done.

2. Mueller said Barr didn't misrepresent or lie about anything in the report, Moron.

3. No way, no how would the report be released "unredacted" you blithering idiot. It contained grand jury testimony and classified info (both are required by law to be redacted)

You need to ask your handlers for new talking point lies...........those suck.

Next?

^ 1. ' Mueller didn't release anything. He had no authority to release anything. He worked for Barr, and was required by law to submit his report to the DOJ. After that, his job was done. '

i said that, dumbfuck. learn to comprehend what you see on the screen. what part of b4 he was allowed to release his own indepth report didn't you understand?

2. ' Mueller said Barr didn't misrepresent or lie about anything in the report, Moron. '

mueller DID say ' The letter written to Barr expressed the special counsel's frustration that the attorney general's memo to Congress "did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance" of the investigation. ' which is easy enough for upright bipeds to think critically & read between the lines.

3. 'No way, no how would the report be released "unredacted" you blithering idiot. It contained grand jury testimony and classified info (both are required by law to be redacted)'

really? you sure about that? of course certain classified portions must be redacted if there are ongoing active cases being investigated, but:

Academics, Congress, Courts, Criminal law, Lawyering April 17, 2019
Columbia Professor: Barr Can Release Grand Jury Information But Does Not Want To Do So
Columbia Professor: Barr Can Release Grand Jury Information But Does Not Want To Do So

AG Barr: No Plans to Ask Court to Release Grand Jury Info in Mueller Report

ALM MediaApril 9, 2019
[...]

Rep. Ed Case, D-Hawaii, questioned Barr on whether he intends to directly ask a federal judge to make sensitive information in Mueller’s report public. Although Barr has said it would be illegal to release grand jury material, he could ask the judge presiding over Mueller’s grand jury—Chief Judge Beryl Howell of Washington's federal trial court—to permit the release.

“My intention is not to ask for it at this stage,” Barr told Case. He noted Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-New York, who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, could make that request himself. Nadler has threatened to subpoena the Justice Department for Mueller’s findings, if he and Barr can’t come to an agreement over redactions
[...]
AG Barr: No Plans to Ask Court to Release Grand Jury Info in Mueller Report

& there has been precedence on releasing grand jury testimony already on the books:

An Untold Option for Mueller: Grand Jury “Presentment” as an Alternative to Indicting Trump
[...]
Other courts have also distinguished Briggs, for example, in a case where there was an “important countervailing public interest,” and in another case where the individual “simply cannot be indicted and tried.”
An Untold Option for Mueller: Grand Jury "Presentment" as an Alternative to Indicting Trump - Just Security

Special Prosecutor Starr’s Documents Will Be Unsealed
April 17, 2018
[...]
“While the continued secrecy of judicial opinions regarding grand jury matters is necessary to protect the integrity of an ongoing investigation, that need for secrecy decreases once the investigation ends and continues to diminish over time,” the ruling states. “The public has an overarching interest in the accessibility of judicial opinions.”
Special Prosecutor Starr’s Documents Will Be Unsealed

but here, i'll throw in a couple things you also didn't hear about because of the fake news you watch.

Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'
By Harper Neidig - 03/05/20 05:13 PM EST
[...]

Judge Reggie B. Walton, a federal district court judge in Washington, said that he could not reconcile Barr's public comments in April 2019 about the report with the actual findings that former special counsel Robert Mueller outlined.

"The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary," Walton wrote in his decision.

"These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility" as well as the DOJ's arguments in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, Walton added.

A DOJ spokeswoman did not respond when asked for comment.

The judge, who was appointed to the court by former President George W. Bush, said he would review the full report to determine whether the redactions made by the DOJ are subject to a FOIA request.
Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'

DOJ turns over unredacted Mueller report to judge who questioned Barr's 'credibility'
by Jerry Dunleavy & Daniel Chaitin
| March 30, 2020 08:50 PM | Updated Mar 30, 2020, 09:40 PM
DOJ turns over unredacted Mueller report to judge who questioned Barr's 'credibility'

'You need to ask your handlers for new talking point lies...........those suck.'

Next?'

haaaaaaaaaaaaaa........................

you lose. anyhoo - i know your poorly educated lazy ass won't bother to read any of it, but for those who care about facts , might indulge in the reality.

1. Sorry moron, Mueller never released any report. He submitted it to his boss, AG Barr. Barr released the report.

2. I will go with the facts idiot, not what you think you "read between the lines".

3. Thanks for proving it would be illegal for Barr to release classified info and grand jury testimony, but there really was no need for you to go to all that trouble bringing all those links proving my point.

he couldn't release the report without barr's go ahead. this is the 3rd time i've said it, you dolt.

the facts are in quotes by mueller himself AND backed up by a (R) judge.

of course barr release the unredacted report with out going to the court first & petition for the release in the interest of the public because it has been done b4; but billy boy doesn't want to. why would that be.

so CONtinue to be a dolt, a bigley one in fact. your argument holds no water, but it sure is funny to see you holding water for yer chosen one!

You can say it 1000 times, Halfwit.

Mueller couldn’t release the report. Period. He had to give it to his boss, AG Barr.

& barr, being an ankle grabber for donny - could have it released if he petitioned the court. he didn't want to, because it's damning to trump et al & the DC judge has it now. warts & all. so to quote yer chosen one:

How dare Barr want to keep classified info secret, and not release grand Jury testimony.

Especially when Mueller saw all that and concluded there was NO COLLUSION.

Oops!

You need to go a little deeper than Billy the Bagman's duplicitous, bumper sticker length summary, nitwit.

Guide to the Mueller Report’s Findings on “Collusion”

Essential reading on the Mueller Report: an annotation plus key findings, drawing on investigative reports and Special Counsel court filings.

www.justsecurity.org

Whatever, BWK.

 

[Nostra]

Mueller told AG Barr his four-page memo that exonerated Trump from collusion and obstruction caused 'confusion' and did NOT capture the 'context, nature and substance' of his detailed report

Mueller complained that Barr's conclusions didn't capture his report

Special counsel Robert Mueller reportedly wrote a letter to Attorney General William Barr complaining that his memo to Congress exonerating Trump of Russian collusion did not fully capture his report.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Mic drop.

Daily Mail is fake news. Find a WSJ article that corroborates your claims. Until then STFU, you Palestinian troll.

• Politics

Mueller Objected to Barr’s Summary of Report
Special counsel said attorney general ‘did not fully capture the context, nature and substance’ of findings on Trump and Russia


Mueller Objected to Barr’s Summary of Report

Let us know how you "fully capture" a report that is hundreds of pages in a 5 page summary.

well duh.... that 'summary' wasn't asked for nor wanted - - - but billy boy took it upon himself to do just that weeks b4 mueller was allowed to release his in depth report.

all barr had to do was petition the court & in the 'nest interest' of the public - it would have been released unredacted.

so save your flawed logic - it doesn't square.

1. Mueller didn't release anything. He had no authority to release anything. He worked for Barr, and was required by law to submit his report to the DOJ. After that, his job was done.

2. Mueller said Barr didn't misrepresent or lie about anything in the report, Moron.

3. No way, no how would the report be released "unredacted" you blithering idiot. It contained grand jury testimony and classified info (both are required by law to be redacted)

You need to ask your handlers for new talking point lies...........those suck.

Next?

^ 1. ' Mueller didn't release anything. He had no authority to release anything. He worked for Barr, and was required by law to submit his report to the DOJ. After that, his job was done. '

i said that, dumbfuck. learn to comprehend what you see on the screen. what part of b4 he was allowed to release his own indepth report didn't you understand?

2. ' Mueller said Barr didn't misrepresent or lie about anything in the report, Moron. '

mueller DID say ' The letter written to Barr expressed the special counsel's frustration that the attorney general's memo to Congress "did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance" of the investigation. ' which is easy enough for upright bipeds to think critically & read between the lines.

3. 'No way, no how would the report be released "unredacted" you blithering idiot. It contained grand jury testimony and classified info (both are required by law to be redacted)'

really? you sure about that? of course certain classified portions must be redacted if there are ongoing active cases being investigated, but:

Academics, Congress, Courts, Criminal law, Lawyering April 17, 2019
Columbia Professor: Barr Can Release Grand Jury Information But Does Not Want To Do So
Columbia Professor: Barr Can Release Grand Jury Information But Does Not Want To Do So

AG Barr: No Plans to Ask Court to Release Grand Jury Info in Mueller Report

ALM MediaApril 9, 2019
[...]

Rep. Ed Case, D-Hawaii, questioned Barr on whether he intends to directly ask a federal judge to make sensitive information in Mueller’s report public. Although Barr has said it would be illegal to release grand jury material, he could ask the judge presiding over Mueller’s grand jury—Chief Judge Beryl Howell of Washington's federal trial court—to permit the release.

“My intention is not to ask for it at this stage,” Barr told Case. He noted Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-New York, who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, could make that request himself. Nadler has threatened to subpoena the Justice Department for Mueller’s findings, if he and Barr can’t come to an agreement over redactions
[...]
AG Barr: No Plans to Ask Court to Release Grand Jury Info in Mueller Report

& there has been precedence on releasing grand jury testimony already on the books:

An Untold Option for Mueller: Grand Jury “Presentment” as an Alternative to Indicting Trump
[...]
Other courts have also distinguished Briggs, for example, in a case where there was an “important countervailing public interest,” and in another case where the individual “simply cannot be indicted and tried.”
An Untold Option for Mueller: Grand Jury "Presentment" as an Alternative to Indicting Trump - Just Security

Special Prosecutor Starr’s Documents Will Be Unsealed
April 17, 2018
[...]
“While the continued secrecy of judicial opinions regarding grand jury matters is necessary to protect the integrity of an ongoing investigation, that need for secrecy decreases once the investigation ends and continues to diminish over time,” the ruling states. “The public has an overarching interest in the accessibility of judicial opinions.”
Special Prosecutor Starr’s Documents Will Be Unsealed

but here, i'll throw in a couple things you also didn't hear about because of the fake news you watch.

Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'
By Harper Neidig - 03/05/20 05:13 PM EST
[...]

Judge Reggie B. Walton, a federal district court judge in Washington, said that he could not reconcile Barr's public comments in April 2019 about the report with the actual findings that former special counsel Robert Mueller outlined.

"The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary," Walton wrote in his decision.

"These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility" as well as the DOJ's arguments in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, Walton added.

A DOJ spokeswoman did not respond when asked for comment.

The judge, who was appointed to the court by former President George W. Bush, said he would review the full report to determine whether the redactions made by the DOJ are subject to a FOIA request.
Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'

DOJ turns over unredacted Mueller report to judge who questioned Barr's 'credibility'
by Jerry Dunleavy & Daniel Chaitin
| March 30, 2020 08:50 PM | Updated Mar 30, 2020, 09:40 PM
DOJ turns over unredacted Mueller report to judge who questioned Barr's 'credibility'

'You need to ask your handlers for new talking point lies...........those suck.'

Next?'

haaaaaaaaaaaaaa........................

you lose. anyhoo - i know your poorly educated lazy ass won't bother to read any of it, but for those who care about facts , might indulge in the reality.

1. Sorry moron, Mueller never released any report. He submitted it to his boss, AG Barr. Barr released the report.

2. I will go with the facts idiot, not what you think you "read between the lines".

3. Thanks for proving it would be illegal for Barr to release classified info and grand jury testimony, but there really was no need for you to go to all that trouble bringing all those links proving my point.

he couldn't release the report without barr's go ahead. this is the 3rd time i've said it, you dolt.

the facts are in quotes by mueller himself AND backed up by a (R) judge.

of course barr release the unredacted report with out going to the court first & petition for the release in the interest of the public because it has been done b4; but billy boy doesn't want to. why would that be.

so CONtinue to be a dolt, a bigley one in fact. your argument holds no water, but it sure is funny to see you holding water for yer chosen one!

You can say it 1000 times, Halfwit.

Mueller couldn’t release the report. Period. He had to give it to his boss, AG Barr.

& barr, being an ankle grabber for donny - could have it released if he petitioned the court. he didn't want to, because it's damning to trump et al & the DC judge has it now. warts & all. so to quote yer chosen one:

How dare Barr want to keep classified info secret, and not release grand Jury testimony.

Especially when Mueller saw all that and concluded there was NO COLLUSION.

Oops!

You need to go a little deeper than Billy the Bagman's duplicitous, bumper sticker length summary, nitwit.

Guide to the Mueller Report’s Findings on “Collusion”

Essential reading on the Mueller Report: an annotation plus key findings, drawing on investigative reports and Special Counsel court filings.

www.justsecurity.org

Why do you always bring leftist spin? Why not just quote the Mueller report directly where it clearly states there was NO COLLUSION?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Mueller told AG Barr his four-page memo that exonerated Trump from collusion and obstruction caused 'confusion' and did NOT capture the 'context, nature and substance' of his detailed report

Mueller complained that Barr's conclusions didn't capture his report

Special counsel Robert Mueller reportedly wrote a letter to Attorney General William Barr complaining that his memo to Congress exonerating Trump of Russian collusion did not fully capture his report.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Mic drop.

Daily Mail is fake news. Find a WSJ article that corroborates your claims. Until then STFU, you Palestinian troll.

• Politics

Mueller Objected to Barr’s Summary of Report
Special counsel said attorney general ‘did not fully capture the context, nature and substance’ of findings on Trump and Russia


Mueller Objected to Barr’s Summary of Report

Let us know how you "fully capture" a report that is hundreds of pages in a 5 page summary.

well duh.... that 'summary' wasn't asked for nor wanted - - - but billy boy took it upon himself to do just that weeks b4 mueller was allowed to release his in depth report.

all barr had to do was petition the court & in the 'nest interest' of the public - it would have been released unredacted.

so save your flawed logic - it doesn't square.

1. Mueller didn't release anything. He had no authority to release anything. He worked for Barr, and was required by law to submit his report to the DOJ. After that, his job was done.

2. Mueller said Barr didn't misrepresent or lie about anything in the report, Moron.

3. No way, no how would the report be released "unredacted" you blithering idiot. It contained grand jury testimony and classified info (both are required by law to be redacted)

You need to ask your handlers for new talking point lies...........those suck.

Next?

^ 1. ' Mueller didn't release anything. He had no authority to release anything. He worked for Barr, and was required by law to submit his report to the DOJ. After that, his job was done. '

i said that, dumbfuck. learn to comprehend what you see on the screen. what part of b4 he was allowed to release his own indepth report didn't you understand?

2. ' Mueller said Barr didn't misrepresent or lie about anything in the report, Moron. '

mueller DID say ' The letter written to Barr expressed the special counsel's frustration that the attorney general's memo to Congress "did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance" of the investigation. ' which is easy enough for upright bipeds to think critically & read between the lines.

3. 'No way, no how would the report be released "unredacted" you blithering idiot. It contained grand jury testimony and classified info (both are required by law to be redacted)'

really? you sure about that? of course certain classified portions must be redacted if there are ongoing active cases being investigated, but:

Academics, Congress, Courts, Criminal law, Lawyering April 17, 2019
Columbia Professor: Barr Can Release Grand Jury Information But Does Not Want To Do So
Columbia Professor: Barr Can Release Grand Jury Information But Does Not Want To Do So

AG Barr: No Plans to Ask Court to Release Grand Jury Info in Mueller Report

ALM MediaApril 9, 2019
[...]

Rep. Ed Case, D-Hawaii, questioned Barr on whether he intends to directly ask a federal judge to make sensitive information in Mueller’s report public. Although Barr has said it would be illegal to release grand jury material, he could ask the judge presiding over Mueller’s grand jury—Chief Judge Beryl Howell of Washington's federal trial court—to permit the release.

“My intention is not to ask for it at this stage,” Barr told Case. He noted Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-New York, who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, could make that request himself. Nadler has threatened to subpoena the Justice Department for Mueller’s findings, if he and Barr can’t come to an agreement over redactions
[...]
AG Barr: No Plans to Ask Court to Release Grand Jury Info in Mueller Report

& there has been precedence on releasing grand jury testimony already on the books:

An Untold Option for Mueller: Grand Jury “Presentment” as an Alternative to Indicting Trump
[...]
Other courts have also distinguished Briggs, for example, in a case where there was an “important countervailing public interest,” and in another case where the individual “simply cannot be indicted and tried.”
An Untold Option for Mueller: Grand Jury "Presentment" as an Alternative to Indicting Trump - Just Security

Special Prosecutor Starr’s Documents Will Be Unsealed
April 17, 2018
[...]
“While the continued secrecy of judicial opinions regarding grand jury matters is necessary to protect the integrity of an ongoing investigation, that need for secrecy decreases once the investigation ends and continues to diminish over time,” the ruling states. “The public has an overarching interest in the accessibility of judicial opinions.”
Special Prosecutor Starr’s Documents Will Be Unsealed

but here, i'll throw in a couple things you also didn't hear about because of the fake news you watch.

Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'
By Harper Neidig - 03/05/20 05:13 PM EST
[...]

Judge Reggie B. Walton, a federal district court judge in Washington, said that he could not reconcile Barr's public comments in April 2019 about the report with the actual findings that former special counsel Robert Mueller outlined.

"The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary," Walton wrote in his decision.

"These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility" as well as the DOJ's arguments in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, Walton added.

A DOJ spokeswoman did not respond when asked for comment.

The judge, who was appointed to the court by former President George W. Bush, said he would review the full report to determine whether the redactions made by the DOJ are subject to a FOIA request.
Judge demands unredacted Mueller report, questions Barr's 'credibility'

DOJ turns over unredacted Mueller report to judge who questioned Barr's 'credibility'
by Jerry Dunleavy & Daniel Chaitin
| March 30, 2020 08:50 PM | Updated Mar 30, 2020, 09:40 PM
DOJ turns over unredacted Mueller report to judge who questioned Barr's 'credibility'

'You need to ask your handlers for new talking point lies...........those suck.'

Next?'

haaaaaaaaaaaaaa........................

you lose. anyhoo - i know your poorly educated lazy ass won't bother to read any of it, but for those who care about facts , might indulge in the reality.

1. Sorry moron, Mueller never released any report. He submitted it to his boss, AG Barr. Barr released the report.

2. I will go with the facts idiot, not what you think you "read between the lines".

3. Thanks for proving it would be illegal for Barr to release classified info and grand jury testimony, but there really was no need for you to go to all that trouble bringing all those links proving my point.

he couldn't release the report without barr's go ahead. this is the 3rd time i've said it, you dolt.

the facts are in quotes by mueller himself AND backed up by a (R) judge.

of course barr release the unredacted report with out going to the court first & petition for the release in the interest of the public because it has been done b4; but billy boy doesn't want to. why would that be.

so CONtinue to be a dolt, a bigley one in fact. your argument holds no water, but it sure is funny to see you holding water for yer chosen one!

You can say it 1000 times, Halfwit.

Mueller couldn’t release the report. Period. He had to give it to his boss, AG Barr.

& barr, being an ankle grabber for donny - could have it released if he petitioned the court. he didn't want to, because it's damning to trump et al & the DC judge has it now. warts & all. so to quote yer chosen one:

How dare Barr want to keep classified info secret, and not release grand Jury testimony.

Especially when Mueller saw all that and concluded there was NO COLLUSION.

Oops!

You need to go a little deeper than Billy the Bagman's duplicitous, bumper sticker length summary, nitwit.

Guide to the Mueller Report’s Findings on “Collusion”

Essential reading on the Mueller Report: an annotation plus key findings, drawing on investigative reports and Special Counsel court filings.

www.justsecurity.org

Why do you always bring leftist spin? Why not just quote the Mueller report directly where it clearly states there was NO COLLUSION?

Because he is a Chinese national here to poison America. His other account is BWK.

 

[two_iron]

The Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday reaffirmed its support for the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusion that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election with the goal of putting Donald Trump in the Oval Office.

Tuesday's bipartisan report, from a panel chaired by North Carolina Republican Richard Burr, undercuts Trump's years of efforts to portray allegations of Kremlin assistance to his campaign as a "hoax," driven by Democrats and a “deep state” embedded within the government bureaucracy. The report does not address the question of whether anyone in the president's orbit colluded with the Russian efforts.

Senate Intel report confirms Russia aimed to help Trump in 2016

The report represents a confidence-booster to the country’s intelligence community.

www.politico.com

......................................................................................................................................................................
Absolutely nothing new here. Just further confirmation of Trump's duplicity..................and Trumpette's gullibility.

Please quote the text that says Russia was deliberately trying to help Trump.

Ouch... did that feel good breaking your foot off in a snowflake's tender ass?

 

[berg80]

Ouch... did that feel good breaking your foot off in a snowflake's tender ass?

You haven't been attending your remedial reading classes have you. Shame on you.

"The Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday reaffirmed its support for the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusion that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election with the goal of putting Donald Trump in the Oval Office."

 

[Nostra]

Ouch... did that feel good breaking your foot off in a snowflake's tender ass?

You haven't been attending your remedial reading classes have you. Shame on you.

"The Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday reaffirmed its support for the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusion that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election with the goal of putting Donald Trump in the Oval Office."

And didn’t change a single vote.

Oops!

 

[berg80]

Not that he didn't have the right to, cuz he did, but why do Trumptards believe Donnie J refused to testify for Mueller's investigation?

Not that he didn't have the right to, cuz he did (or did he), but why do Trumptards believe Big Fat Don refused to answer questions about obstruction.............even in written form?

 

[Nostra]

Not that he didn't have the right to, cuz he did, but why do Trumptards believe Donnie J refused to testify for Mueller's investigation?

Trump answered written questions, provided tens of thousands of documents. And allowed all other witnesses to testify.

Next?

 

[berg80]

Remember when..................

Giuliani tells AP Trump won't answer Mueller's obstruction questions, then backtracks

Giuliani tells AP Trump won't answer Mueller's obstruction questions, then backtracks

Rudy Giuliani told the AP: "That's a no-go. That is not going to happen." But told NBC those questions are "not ruled in or out."

www.nbcnews.com

 

[Nostra]

Remember when..................

Giuliani tells AP Trump won't answer Mueller's obstruction questions, then backtracks

Giuliani tells AP Trump won't answer Mueller's obstruction questions, then backtracks

Rudy Giuliani told the AP: "That's a no-go. That is not going to happen." But told NBC those questions are "not ruled in or out."

www.nbcnews.com

You just brought a link that proves your post 324 is all lies.

Oops!

 

[The VOR]

Senate Intel report confirms Russia aimed to help Trump in 2016

The report represents a confidence-booster to the country’s intelligence community.

www.politico.com

[[[[[ The Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday reaffirmed its support for the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusion that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election with the goal of putting Donald Trump in the Oval Office.
Tuesday's bipartisan report, from a panel chaired by North Carolina Republican Richard Burr, undercuts Trump's years of efforts to portray allegations of Kremlin assistance to his campaign as a "hoax," driven by Democrats and a “deep state” embedded within the government bureaucracy.

The intelligence community’s initial January 2017 assessment of Moscow’s influence campaign included “specific intelligence reporting to support the assessment that [Russian President Vladimir] Putin and the Russian government demonstrated a preference for candidate Trump,” the committee’s report says. The panel also found “specific intelligence” to support the conclusion that Putin “approved and directed aspects” of the Kremlin’s interference efforts. ]]]]]

RINOS!!! RINOS!!!
THEY'RE ALL FUCKING RINOS!!!

FAKE NEWS!!! FAKE NEWS!!!

 

[shockedcanadian]

You could conduct an intel report and easily find that Britain, Canada, Ukraine and many nations were aiming to put Clinton in the WH. Cold hard cash in her "Foundation" certainly goes a much longer way than some nerds with poor English skills on Facebook.

Now that we are on the subject of Russia and the power of Putin, can someone contact them and ask them to help me get a decent job in Canada? Thanks in advance.

S.C

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Which Americans were charged with collusion?

Moot question, there is no statute pertaining to collusion.

Thanks for admitting you were whining for nothing.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I guess since some states are talking about reopening now, possibly crushing your dreams of The Great Depression Part II: Electric Boogaloo, you guys have no Plan D, so we're falling back on Russia! Russia! Russia! again?

Senate committees are led by repubicans, dope.

 

[Nostra]

I guess since some states are talking about reopening now, possibly crushing your dreams of The Great Depression Part II: Electric Boogaloo, you guys have no Plan D, so we're falling back on Russia! Russia! Russia! again?

Senate committees are led by repubicans, dope.

Does that mean Dimwingers can’t announce what their plan would be? Nope.

 

[Rye Catcher]

Compare and contrast teeny tiny Russia for Trump to BIG FUCKING ASS 24/7 media propaganda for all things PROG.

We're supposed to feel cheated because a few Russians supported Trump on social media. Media that few even saw.

The Russians hacked and disseminated the private emails of the DNC and Clinton’s advisor.

It was illegal.

The Russians hacked and disseminated the private emails of the DNC and Clinton’s advisor.

Yes, Russia is awful!
Makes you wonder why Obama wanted to get all flexible for Putin, eh comrade?

I think Dana was thinking about you and your support for trump who has surrendered US hegemony in the Middle East to Putin, and his efforts to establish the power and territory of the former USSR.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

No I will never believe anything coming from mainstream media you fucking sheep

Why would anyone make such a dogmatic statement? Why not take some time to verify or disprove what you see before dismissing it?

You do yourself and the country a disservice by blindly accepting what Trump tells you given his documented record as an inveterate liar.

Horseshit all you do is repeat lies

Compare and contrast teeny tiny Russia for Trump to BIG FUCKING ASS 24/7 media propaganda for all things PROG.

We're supposed to feel cheated because a few Russians supported Trump on social media. Media that few even saw.

Over the next four months, the media establishment will play a central role in informing the public about the candidates and the issues. As the countdown to Election Day begins, it is important to remember the journalists who will help establish the campaign agenda are not an all-American mix of Democrats, Republicans and independents, but an elite group whose views veer sharply to the left.

Surveys over the past 25 years have consistently found that journalists are more liberal than rest of America. This MRC Special Report summarizes the relevant data on journalist attitudes, as well as polling showing how the American public’s recognition of the media’s liberal bias has grown over the years:

The Liberal Media:Every Poll Shows Journalists Are More Liberal than the American Public — And the Public Knows It

Executive SummaryOver the next four months, the media establishment will play a central role in informing the public about the candidates and the issues. As the countdown to Election Day begins, it is important to remember the journalists who will help establish the campaign agenda are not an...

www.mrc.org

The Media Bubble Is Real — And Worse Than You Think

Wondering how reporters missed the Trump wave? We crunched the data on where they work and how fast it’s changing. The results should worry the country.

www.politico.com

Recognizing bias is a good thing. Ignoring the information the media provides is crazy stupid. The consumer just needs to make a note there may be (1) more to the story or (2) another side to the story, and go look for it. Then you know all the facts.

No I will never believe anything coming from mainstream media you fucking sheep

stop projecting sheeple

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Compare and contrast teeny tiny Russia for Trump to BIG FUCKING ASS 24/7 media propaganda for all things PROG.

We're supposed to feel cheated because a few Russians supported Trump on social media. Media that few even saw.

The Russians hacked and disseminated the private emails of the DNC and Clinton’s advisor.

It was illegal.

The Russians hacked and disseminated the private emails of the DNC and Clinton’s advisor.

Yes, Russia is awful!
Makes you wonder why Obama wanted to get all flexible for Putin, eh comrade?

I think Dana was thinking about you and your support for trump who has surrendered US hegemony in the Middle East to Putin, and his efforts to establish the power and territory of the former USSR.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Compare and contrast teeny tiny Russia for Trump to BIG FUCKING ASS 24/7 media propaganda for all things PROG.

We're supposed to feel cheated because a few Russians supported Trump on social media. Media that few even saw.

The Russians hacked and disseminated the private emails of the DNC and Clinton’s advisor.

It was illegal.

The Russians hacked and disseminated the private emails of the DNC and Clinton’s advisor.

Yes, Russia is awful!
Makes you wonder why Obama wanted to get all flexible for Putin, eh comrade?

I think Dana was thinking about you and your support for trump who has surrendered US hegemony in the Middle East to Putin, and his efforts to establish the power and territory of the former USSR.

I think Dana was thinking about you and your support for trump who has surrendered US hegemony in the Middle East to Putin,

Yeah, Obama's red-line in Syria really showed Putin who was boss...…..

 

[Rye Catcher]

Compare and contrast teeny tiny Russia for Trump to BIG FUCKING ASS 24/7 media propaganda for all things PROG.

We're supposed to feel cheated because a few Russians supported Trump on social media. Media that few even saw.

The Russians hacked and disseminated the private emails of the DNC and Clinton’s advisor.

It was illegal.

The Russians hacked and disseminated the private emails of the DNC and Clinton’s advisor.

Yes, Russia is awful!
Makes you wonder why Obama wanted to get all flexible for Putin, eh comrade?

I think Dana was thinking about you and your support for trump who has surrendered US hegemony in the Middle East to Putin, and his efforts to establish the power and territory of the former USSR.

I think Dana was thinking about you and your support for trump who has surrendered US hegemony in the Middle East to Putin,

Yeah, Obama's red-line in Syria really showed Putin who was boss...…..

Not even close to giving Putin's forces our air field, and having our troops pelted with food by the Kurds trump has put in harms way.

US troops pelted with vegetables by angry residents as they withdraw from north Syria

Pentagon is mulling leaving small contingent of troops in northern Syria to guard oil fields against Isis

www.independent.co.uk