They said that this will likely not be settled before the election. It buys him a bit more than time, it prevents him from the possibility of having to turn over his tax information in the event that he loses in the lower court PRIOR to election day where that information, if negative, may sway the voters.
Which is why Trump keeps firing the US attorney who would investigate such things. Trump personally interviewed the everybody would would have federal jurisdiction. The US Attorney for the Southern District of New York (where Trump Tower is), The US Attorney for Florida, where Mar-a-lago is located. Plus the Attorney General.
Correct. And it is why Barr is cleaning house.
So you are 100% positive Trump has all sorts of illegal activity in his taxes. All prepared and audited by CPAs. Knowing it is audited every year by the IRS. You're saying that right.
Actually the congressional subpoenas will take well beyond election day to settle. But when they are settled, a lot of that information can be released publicly.
More like, clues to illegal activity that can be investigated.
Trump has multiple sets of books. One for the IRS, one for local property tax, and another for bank loans. Since these three entities don't share information, nobody from their perspective can prove Trump is cheating.
Like Russia and Impeachment. You convinced me....Wonk...Wonk....Wonk
And you have touched upon some reasons why money laundering is so hard to investigate and demonstrate. Lots of data has to be gained and analyzed from a variety of sources, many private entities. You need the data to demonstrate the money laundering, but you need to demonstrate probable money laundering to get a warrant to get the data. The variety of sources makes that a slog.
Yes, roll up into the fetal position and listen for a while. That's probably best. You will almost certainly learn something.
Okay, i take back what i said. Participation trophy time for you. Do you understand how a trump owned property would launder money?
It's more like knowing that Trump told two conflicting stories under penalty of perjury. One to the IRS, the other to the banks he got loans from.
Oh yes, that too. And under reporting of revenue. You know he did everything he thought he could get away with. This is Trump we are talking about.
LOL. Ok sure. All we'll find out is that they are the frauds we knew them to be...but.......my guess is Trump doesn't want people to see his returns because they'll find out he didn't make any money..and actually lost money...making him a bigger fraud than any of the other people you've named. A blow to the ego.
Trump also overreported revenue. Like when one of his casinos was about to miss a loan payment, he had his father Fred Trump purchase over $3 million in chips, which he claimed as income, instead of the "loan" it actually was.
Thanks for proving the truth of my comment, Moron.
Indeed. When needed.
Correct, and most people would have been felons after that. But Freddie was well connected.
Stigmatized. The word stigma. Trump lawyer Seculow lost over that word.The Orange Shit Gibbon lost his attempt to hide his Tax Records from the Manhattan D.A. In a 7-2 Decision (Majority Decision written CJ Roberts) the court held,
“In our judicial system, ‘the public has a right to every man’s evidence.’ Since the earliest days of the Republic, ‘every man’ has included the President of the United States,” Roberts wrote.
.
Supreme Court says Manhattan DA can get Trump's tax records, but rejects bid by House Democrats
The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered split opinions in two cases over whether President Donald Trump can shield his tax records from investigators, handing a win to the Manhattan district attorney but rejecting parallel efforts by Democrats in the House of Representatives.www.cnbc.com
The Supreme Court on Thursday voted 7-2 against President Donald Trump in a case over whether he could shield his tax records from the Manhattan district attorney.
Chief Justice John Roberts authored the court’s opinion, which was joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch wrote separately to explain their votes with the majority. Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented.
Wrong...you doofus.....his lawyers won against the Supreme Court......they sent it back down to the lower court and they will drag out the court fight to past the election.....when it won't matter any more...you doofus.
haha, and the court was so kind.
