Trump Will Be Impeached

[Richard-H]

Trump may be impeached, the problem is he won't be convinced.

yes, but it will leave all those Senate Republicans having to explain to there constituents why they refused to remove a crook form office.

 

[Faun]

There's no doubt that Trump will be impeached.

The real question is:

What can be done to insure a fair Senate trial?

The Republican senators are a bunch of spineless weenies that will not vote to convict Trump no matter how guilty he is.

The House of Representatives should do it's job anyway and impeach Trump. Let the Senate weenies go down in history for refusing to remove the most corrupt (and idiotic) President in this nation's history!

The only thing to keep them in check is public perception since so many Republican seats are up for grabs in the 2020 election.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Nancy Pelosi’s December 2018 Rule Changes Block Republicans From Participating In Impeachment Process
Nancy Pelosi's December 2018 Rule Changes Block Republicans From Participating In Impeachment Process

Go ahead and read it if you can read. "Doesn't matter", only tells me that you agree with what I posted and just too much
of a minion to care.

Changes do matter.

Dems blast House GOP subpoena rules change

Democratic lawmakers are harshly criticizing House Republicans for altering committee rules governing how chairmen can subpoena witnesses and documents.

In a letter shared with POLITICO, the Democrats slams the GOP conference for changing rules on a number of House committees to make it easier for Republicans to subpoena witnesses without consultation or approval from minority lawmakers - an effort that came as Republicans are preparing aggressive oversight efforts for President Barack Obama’s final two years in office.

The powerful weapon House Republicans handed Democrats

House Republicans changed the rules in 2015 to allow many of their committee chairmen to issue subpoenas without consulting the minority party, overriding Democrats objections that likened the tactic to something out of the McCarthy era.


Now the weapon that the GOP wielded dozens of times against President Barack Obama’s agencies could allow Democrats to bombard President Donald Trump’s most controversial appointees with demands for information. And many Democrats are itching to use it.

“The Republicans have set the standard and, by God, we’re going to emulate that standard,” Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) told POLITICO.

I do not know how true the 2015 rule is. But was that after the Dems changed the rules in voting for judges from 60 to simple majority? They were probably pizzed at that time.

That was in the Senate and has nothing to do with subpoena power or procedural rules in the House.

subpoena's from the house are not judicial and cannot be used to threaten people. one can ignore them without repercussions.

"The day Richard Nixon failed to answer that subpoena is the day he was subject to impeachment because he took the power from Congress over the impeachment process away from Congress, and he became the judge and jury," Graham said two decades ag

Poor Lindsey, he needs to retire and become what he really wants to be.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Only difference....Benghazi was completely manufactured bullshit....

the Russia thing ended up with felony convictions....

and this Ukraine thing is ending up with felony convictions and a possible impeachment

Other than that, yea...both sides do it....if that makes you feel better

There was felony convictions of trump colludingvwith russia?
Where are the convictions with ukraine?
What?

These two guys were arrested on felony charges, along with 2 others....they were arrested for actions directly related to Trump -- so much so that even Trump's own personal lawyer is under 2 different criminal investigations...
View attachment 285862

As for the Russian investigation, the only charges handed out for election meddling were given out to the Russian officials who conducted it...but.....I do know that Trump's other personal lawyer is currently in prison for shit directly related to Trump, so much so that Trump was named an unindicted co-conspirator.....Now since I know you like to say "both sides do it" because of your intellectual laziness -- can you give me the "both sides" example to this one??

Does Obama have 2 personal attorneys either convicted or being investigated for something they were doing for him??

no they weren't. dude, it's really a shame how you have to get on your hands and knees for the demofks. those two fks were not arrested because of trump. but fk, why would you care about facts. what a fkturd you are.

Can you name me who was arrested due to an investigation during the Obama years??

Or are you gonna just keep ignoring these facts I keep kicking yo ass with??

why would I need to do that? no one has been arrested because of trump.

Oh I get it, you trumpers are already doing your "pretend he doesn't exist" routine....

So you are saying Michael Cohen doesn't exist??

 

[jc456]

There was felony convictions of trump colludingvwith russia?
Where are the convictions with ukraine?
What?

These two guys were arrested on felony charges, along with 2 others....they were arrested for actions directly related to Trump -- so much so that even Trump's own personal lawyer is under 2 different criminal investigations...
View attachment 285862

As for the Russian investigation, the only charges handed out for election meddling were given out to the Russian officials who conducted it...but.....I do know that Trump's other personal lawyer is currently in prison for shit directly related to Trump, so much so that Trump was named an unindicted co-conspirator.....Now since I know you like to say "both sides do it" because of your intellectual laziness -- can you give me the "both sides" example to this one??

Does Obama have 2 personal attorneys either convicted or being investigated for something they were doing for him??

no they weren't. dude, it's really a shame how you have to get on your hands and knees for the demofks. those two fks were not arrested because of trump. but fk, why would you care about facts. what a fkturd you are.

Can you name me who was arrested due to an investigation during the Obama years??

Or are you gonna just keep ignoring these facts I keep kicking yo ass with??

why would I need to do that? no one has been arrested because of trump.

Oh I get it, you trumpers are already doing your "pretend he doesn't exist" routine....

So you are saying Michael Cohen doesn't exist??

nope, he exists and he's in jail because of his past not trump's. so again, post the piece? running scared again. you fks never learn. you truly are ignorant as a rock.

 

[Richard-H]

There's no doubt that Trump will be impeached.

The real question is:

What can be done to insure a fair Senate trial?

The Republican senators are a bunch of spineless weenies that will not vote to convict Trump no matter how guilty he is.

The House of Representatives should do it's job anyway and impeach Trump. Let the Senate weenies go down in history for refusing to remove the most corrupt (and idiotic) President in this nation's history!

cause kremlin style double secret investigation is what our country was founded on, right? hey comrade? you must like communism I supposed. what kind of advantages do you think those people get in russia? eh comrade?

if it gets there, the repubs can tell the demofk senators to take a hike and see how you like it. eh? double secret guy

Closed door investigations are not new to this country...there's nothing 'Soviet' about it.

BTW - Russia isn't communist anymore...where have you been for the past 30 years?

 

[jc456]

There's no doubt that Trump will be impeached.

The real question is:

What can be done to insure a fair Senate trial?

The Republican senators are a bunch of spineless weenies that will not vote to convict Trump no matter how guilty he is.

The House of Representatives should do it's job anyway and impeach Trump. Let the Senate weenies go down in history for refusing to remove the most corrupt (and idiotic) President in this nation's history!

cause kremlin style double secret investigation is what our country was founded on, right? hey comrade? you must like communism I supposed. what kind of advantages do you think those people get in russia? eh comrade?

if it gets there, the repubs can tell the demofk senators to take a hike and see how you like it. eh? double secret guy

Closed door investigations are not new to this country...there's nothing 'Soviet' about it.

BTW - Russia isn't communist anymore...where have you been for the past 30 years?

for issues related to classified material you bet. why is this classified exactly? Don't the people have a right to know what the left think our president did? I mean an ambassador in Ukraine needs protection from us why?

 

[Wry Catcher]

The time has come for Trump.

Trump Will Be Impeached
Ambassador William Taylor’s testimony sealed the deal.
October 22, 2019
by John Podhoretz

Remember when I said last week that October 17 was the worst day of the Trump presidency? Well, October 22 and has now come along to break the record. This is the day that, I think, has ensured Donald Trump’s impeachment. Not his removal. But impeachment will be bad enough.

Today’s key sentence: “Ambassador Sondland said, ‘everything’ was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance.”

It comes from the testimony of acting U.S. ambassador to the Ukraine William Taylor before House impeachment investigators, and it instantly makes all but impossible the task of anyone seeking to defend Trump against the charge that he held up American military aid to Ukraine to secure a political advantage in the 2020 election.

There were three defenses of Trump following the revelations of the “whistleblower” and the phone-call transcript of the conversation between the presidents of the United States and Ukraine. The first was that he is only interested in investigating corruption relating to the 2016 election. The second is that even though Trump himself said he wanted the Ukranian to do him a favor, there was no quid pro quo. The third is that the only thing Trump was trading for was a White House visit, which is no great shakes.

There’s no need to talk about the “whistleblower” and his findings any longer, and there’s no need for the whistleblower to be heard any further. We have a veteran U.S. diplomat on the record saying that a Trump intimate told him Trump was holding up Congressionally authorized and appropriated military aid to Ukraine because he wanted a public statement from the Zelensky government that it was investigating Joe Biden’s son.

Taylor said this of a September 1 phone call with Gordon Sondland, our ambassador to the European Union about the $275 million in U.S. security assistance to Ukraine as well as a possible meeting between Trump and Ukranian president Zelensky:

“Ambassador Sondland told me that President Trump had told him that he wants President Zelensky to state publicly that Ukraine will investigate Burisma and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 U.S. election. Ambassador Sondland also told me that he now recognized that he had made a mistake by earlier telling the Ukrainian officials to whom he spoke that a White House meeting with President Zelenskyy was dependent on a public announcement of investigations—in fact, Ambassador Sondland said, ‘everything’ was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance. He said that President Trump wanted President Zelenskyy ‘in a public box’ by making a public statement about ordering such investigations.”

Ambassador William Taylor’s Testimony Ensured Trump’s Impeachment

Trump has a guest coming to visit

And he doesn't worry about invitations​

However appropriate and warranted, impeaching Trump is pointless.

I disagree. The Congress will pass articles of impeachment, and prior to that vote, they will have revealed the evidence in terms of televised testimony and documents posted on the H. of Rep. website.

The evidence to allege high crimes will be beyond a reasonable doubt, or the articles would never have passed.

 

[BlindBoo]

cause kremlin style double secret investigation is what our country was founded on,

So you say that the Democrats are not allowing their Republican counterparts in these closed door sessions? I thought only Republicans had used the power of one sided interviews when investigation a President.

 

[Richard-H]

There's no doubt that Trump will be impeached.

The real question is:

What can be done to insure a fair Senate trial?

The Republican senators are a bunch of spineless weenies that will not vote to convict Trump no matter how guilty he is.

The House of Representatives should do it's job anyway and impeach Trump. Let the Senate weenies go down in history for refusing to remove the most corrupt (and idiotic) President in this nation's history!

cause kremlin style double secret investigation is what our country was founded on, right? hey comrade? you must like communism I supposed. what kind of advantages do you think those people get in russia? eh comrade?

if it gets there, the repubs can tell the demofk senators to take a hike and see how you like it. eh? double secret guy

Closed door investigations are not new to this country...there's nothing 'Soviet' about it.

BTW - Russia isn't communist anymore...where have you been for the past 30 years?

for issues related to classified material you bet. why is this classified exactly? Don't the people have a right to know what the left think our president did? I mean an ambassador in Ukraine needs protection from us why?

Because an Ambassador may very well have to discuss classified info...any other idiotic questions?

 

[airplanemechanic]

If democrats wanted to impeach they would have done it the normal way so as to eliminate any kind of accusations of process violations. Like if a prosecutor really had a good case against the defendant they would follow the law to the letter so as to eliminate the chance that the defendant would get off for a technical violation.

They only want to hurt Trump politically because they have absolutely nothing to run on for themselves.

Hate Trump is the campaign slogan of the left.

 

[Polishprince]

The evidence to allege high crimes will be beyond a reasonable doubt, or the articles would never have passed.

I disagree. The Democrats are so partisan and harbor so much hate against their President, many will vote "aye" regardless.

And the Senate Republicans will only vote for conviction if they want to destroy the Republican Party.

 

[Richard-H]

If democrats wanted to impeach they would have done it the normal way so as to eliminate any kind of accusations of process violations. They only want to hurt Trump politically because they have absolutely nothing to run on for themselves.

Hate Trump is the campaign slogan of the left.

The Democrats ARE following normal procedures. The Republicans are just doin' the old wiggle, wiggle, wiggle because they know Trump is guilty as hell.

Hate Trump is the campaign slogan of any THINKING American!

 

[jc456]

cause kremlin style double secret investigation is what our country was founded on,

So you say that the Democrats are not allowing their Republican counterparts in these closed door sessions? I thought only Republicans had used the power of one sided interviews when investigation a President.

first, yes the republicans are not allowed to participate. fact.

two, the impeachment of clinton was not secret and demofks were allowed to question witnesses. Feel free to post up something different if i am in error there.

 

[Richard-H]

The evidence to allege high crimes will be beyond a reasonable doubt, or the articles would never have passed.

I disagree. The Democrats are so partisan and harbor so much hate against their President, many will vote "aye" regardless.

And the Senate Republicans will only vote for conviction if they want to destroy the Republican Party.

Trump already destroyed the Republican party.

 

[airplanemechanic]

If democrats wanted to impeach they would have done it the normal way so as to eliminate any kind of accusations of process violations. They only want to hurt Trump politically because they have absolutely nothing to run on for themselves.

Hate Trump is the campaign slogan of the left.

The Democrats ARE following normal procedures. The Republicans are just doin' the old wiggle, wiggle, wiggle because they know Trump is guilty as hell.

Hate Trump is the campaign slogan of any THINKING American!

There is nothing normal about closed door hearings where the accused is not allowed to defend themselves unless you're in communist Russia.

 

[jc456]

The time has come for Trump.

Trump Will Be Impeached
Ambassador William Taylor’s testimony sealed the deal.
October 22, 2019
by John Podhoretz

Remember when I said last week that October 17 was the worst day of the Trump presidency? Well, October 22 and has now come along to break the record. This is the day that, I think, has ensured Donald Trump’s impeachment. Not his removal. But impeachment will be bad enough.

Today’s key sentence: “Ambassador Sondland said, ‘everything’ was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance.”

It comes from the testimony of acting U.S. ambassador to the Ukraine William Taylor before House impeachment investigators, and it instantly makes all but impossible the task of anyone seeking to defend Trump against the charge that he held up American military aid to Ukraine to secure a political advantage in the 2020 election.

There were three defenses of Trump following the revelations of the “whistleblower” and the phone-call transcript of the conversation between the presidents of the United States and Ukraine. The first was that he is only interested in investigating corruption relating to the 2016 election. The second is that even though Trump himself said he wanted the Ukranian to do him a favor, there was no quid pro quo. The third is that the only thing Trump was trading for was a White House visit, which is no great shakes.

There’s no need to talk about the “whistleblower” and his findings any longer, and there’s no need for the whistleblower to be heard any further. We have a veteran U.S. diplomat on the record saying that a Trump intimate told him Trump was holding up Congressionally authorized and appropriated military aid to Ukraine because he wanted a public statement from the Zelensky government that it was investigating Joe Biden’s son.

Taylor said this of a September 1 phone call with Gordon Sondland, our ambassador to the European Union about the $275 million in U.S. security assistance to Ukraine as well as a possible meeting between Trump and Ukranian president Zelensky:

“Ambassador Sondland told me that President Trump had told him that he wants President Zelensky to state publicly that Ukraine will investigate Burisma and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 U.S. election. Ambassador Sondland also told me that he now recognized that he had made a mistake by earlier telling the Ukrainian officials to whom he spoke that a White House meeting with President Zelenskyy was dependent on a public announcement of investigations—in fact, Ambassador Sondland said, ‘everything’ was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance. He said that President Trump wanted President Zelenskyy ‘in a public box’ by making a public statement about ordering such investigations.”

Ambassador William Taylor’s Testimony Ensured Trump’s Impeachment

Trump has a guest coming to visit

And he doesn't worry about invitations​

However appropriate and warranted, impeaching Trump is pointless.

I disagree. The Congress will pass articles of impeachment, and prior to that vote, they will have revealed the evidence in terms of televised testimony and documents posted on the H. of Rep. website.

The evidence to allege high crimes will be beyond a reasonable doubt, or the articles would never have passed.

 

[TNHarley]

Russia was the left's Benghazi.
Ukraine will be the lefts.. well idk but it will be up there too.
Partisanship does horrible things to people.

Only difference....Benghazi was completely manufactured bullshit....

the Russia thing ended up with felony convictions....

and this Ukraine thing is ending up with felony convictions and a possible impeachment

Other than that, yea...both sides do it....if that makes you feel better

There was felony convictions of trump colludingvwith russia?
Where are the convictions with ukraine?
What?

These two guys were arrested on felony charges, along with 2 others....they were arrested for actions directly related to Trump -- so much so that even Trump's own personal lawyer is under 2 different criminal investigations...
View attachment 285862

As for the Russian investigation, the only charges handed out for election meddling were given out to the Russian officials who conducted it...but.....I do know that Trump's other personal lawyer is currently in prison for shit directly related to Trump, so much so that Trump was named an unindicted co-conspirator.....Now since I know you like to say "both sides do it" because of your intellectual laziness -- can you give me the "both sides" example to this one??

Does Obama have 2 personal attorneys either convicted or being investigated for something they were doing for him??

So no convictions directly related to either matter..

 

[BrokeLoser]

The time has come for Trump.

Trump Will Be Impeached
Ambassador William Taylor’s testimony sealed the deal.
October 22, 2019
by John Podhoretz

Remember when I said last week that October 17 was the worst day of the Trump presidency? Well, October 22 and has now come along to break the record. This is the day that, I think, has ensured Donald Trump’s impeachment. Not his removal. But impeachment will be bad enough.

Today’s key sentence: “Ambassador Sondland said, ‘everything’ was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance.”

It comes from the testimony of acting U.S. ambassador to the Ukraine William Taylor before House impeachment investigators, and it instantly makes all but impossible the task of anyone seeking to defend Trump against the charge that he held up American military aid to Ukraine to secure a political advantage in the 2020 election.

There were three defenses of Trump following the revelations of the “whistleblower” and the phone-call transcript of the conversation between the presidents of the United States and Ukraine. The first was that he is only interested in investigating corruption relating to the 2016 election. The second is that even though Trump himself said he wanted the Ukranian to do him a favor, there was no quid pro quo. The third is that the only thing Trump was trading for was a White House visit, which is no great shakes.

There’s no need to talk about the “whistleblower” and his findings any longer, and there’s no need for the whistleblower to be heard any further. We have a veteran U.S. diplomat on the record saying that a Trump intimate told him Trump was holding up Congressionally authorized and appropriated military aid to Ukraine because he wanted a public statement from the Zelensky government that it was investigating Joe Biden’s son.

Taylor said this of a September 1 phone call with Gordon Sondland, our ambassador to the European Union about the $275 million in U.S. security assistance to Ukraine as well as a possible meeting between Trump and Ukranian president Zelensky:

“Ambassador Sondland told me that President Trump had told him that he wants President Zelensky to state publicly that Ukraine will investigate Burisma and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 U.S. election. Ambassador Sondland also told me that he now recognized that he had made a mistake by earlier telling the Ukrainian officials to whom he spoke that a White House meeting with President Zelenskyy was dependent on a public announcement of investigations—in fact, Ambassador Sondland said, ‘everything’ was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance. He said that President Trump wanted President Zelenskyy ‘in a public box’ by making a public statement about ordering such investigations.”

Ambassador William Taylor’s Testimony Ensured Trump’s Impeachment

Trump has a guest coming to visit

And he doesn't worry about invitations​

“We got him right where we want him this time.”
“”Mueller is closing in on him.”
“Kavanaugh is guilty.”
“I believe survivors.”
“He’s definitely guilty of Russian collusion.”
“Oh wait, I meant obstruction of justice.”
“Oh wait, something about Ukraine.”
“Oh wait, all I know is he’s guilty of something...I know this because another disgusting LefTard said he is and because I really, really, really want him to be.”

 

[Richard-H]

cause kremlin style double secret investigation is what our country was founded on,

So you say that the Democrats are not allowing their Republican counterparts in these closed door sessions? I thought only Republicans had used the power of one sided interviews when investigation a President.

first, yes the republicans are not allowed to participate. fact.

two, the impeachment of clinton was not secret and demofks were allowed to question witnesses. Feel free to post up something different if i am in error there.

What evidence do you have that Republican members of these committees are no being given fair time to question the witnesses?