Trump — We’re going to look into Ashli Babbitt case.

[GMCGeneral]

If protestors breach a police line, force entry into the building by breaking windows, smashing doors, and killing the cops defending it with the intention of harm to the leaders within then yes, they should face lethal force.

And yet you supported the Burn Loot Murder rioters.

 

[Auld Phart]

Dude, this is not really what's going on here. You are denying facts in a disorganized and desperate way.

I'm speaking from experience,

you're speaking from your ass,

 

[Lesh]

Again. You try to breech ANY police barricade let alone one protecting Congress in the middle of an attack on the Capitol Bldg and you very likely will get a bullet in the face

Few if any would defend you

As noted , if your home were under attack by home invaders and one of them was climbing through a window in the course of that attack, you would empty a weapon into that attackers face and you know it.

If someone else was the victim of that attack and shot that invader you would defend that person with your dying breath

Don’t claim you wouldn’t. You would not be asking if that person was armed. You would not be asking any of the idiot questions the moron above was pretending to be concerned about

Be honest .. at least to yourself

 

[Rawley]

There is no information missing.

Ashes tried to breach the last barricade protecting Congress from that mob and paid the price. And that stopped that attack in its tracks

You throwing out red herrings is just disingenuous bullshit

IN the Lesh handbook of policing, they should have shot this guy instead of using pepper spray.

 

[Lesh]

IN the Lesh handbook of policing, they should have shot this guy instead of using pepper spray.

View attachment 1095054

Did I miss the barricade that guy was trying to breech?

No?

Oh

 

[ThisIsMe]

There is no information missing.

Ashes tried to breach the last barricade protecting Congress from that mob and paid the price. And that stopped that attack in its tracks

And you think there is nothing else there? No other questions need to he asked?

You throwing out red herrings is just disingenuous bullshit

They are not red hearings, Lesh, they are legitimate questions.

Being a police officer doesn't mean that you will only ever have good days. There will be bad days too. When you have those bad days, you hope you will have the training and tools to deal with them.

Your approach of "it happened and that's all we need to know" is wrong. There needs to be answers as to why tools and personnel needed to handle the situation, we're denied.

 

[Rawley]

Did I miss the barricade that guy was trying to breech?

No?

Oh

He already breached it. Violent mob, breach a barricade. Shoot to kill, right? The Lesh doctrine.

 

[Lesh]

And you think there is nothing else there? No other questions need to he asked?


They are not red hearings, Lesh, they are legitimate questions.

Being a police officer doesn't mean that you will only ever have good days. There will be bad days too. When you have those bad days, you hope you will have the training and tools to deal with them.

Your approach of "it happened and that's all we need to know" is wrong. There needs to be answers as to why tools and personnel needed to handle the situation, we're denied.

There is nothing else to it. She was leading a mob that was invading the Capitol a d attack g Congress and Byrd stopped her and the attack in its tracks.

End of story


Yes… asking why a Capitol Police Lieutenant didn’t have a tazer on him is a red herring.

That’s neither typical equipment for a Police Lieutenant in plain clothes nor can you say that a tazer would have stopped that attack. (I’m sure you’ll now go into some long stupid diatribe claiming otherwise but it’s bullshit like all the rest of your lame arguments)

That bullet DID stop the attack

I get that you’re stubbornly trying to defend those Trump MAGA rats but your “concerns” are cynically dishonest and it’s obvious

 

[Lesh]

He already breached it. Violent mob, breach a barricade. Shoot to kill, right? The Lesh doctrine.

Really.? Show us this barricade he breached

I don’t see it

 

[ThisIsMe]

There is nothing else to it. She was leading a mob that was invading the Capitol a d attack g Congress and Byrd stopped her and the attack in its tracks.

End of story


Yes… asking why a Capitol Police Lieutenant didn’t have a tazer on him is a red herring.

No, it's not.

That’s neither typical equipment for a Police Lieutenant in plain clothes nor can you say that a tazer would have stopped that attack. (I’m sure you’ll now go into some long stupid diatribe claiming otherwise but it’s bullshit like all the rest of your lame arguments)

Because they COULD have had other tools provided to them, but we're denied. You seem to not want to know why there were no officers there with non lethal force? If the only option they were given was deadly force, something is wrong.

That bullet DID stop the attack

I get that you’re stubbornly trying to defend those Trump MAGA rats but your “concerns” are cynically dishonest and it’s obvious

Have you once seen me defend anyone at the riot? I've been vocal that they were in the wrong. Asking why the police were not given proper tools is not defending the rioters.

 

[Lesh]

No, it's not.




Because they COULD have had other tools provided to them, but we're denied. You seem to not want to know why there were no officers there with non lethal force? If the only option they were given was deadly force, something is wrong.




Have you once seen me defend anyone at the riot? I've been vocal that they were in the wrong. Asking why the police were not given proper tools is not defending the rioters.

Your bullshit has been responded to and you just talk past me

Your attempts to throw red herrings out there and muddy the water have failed

The fact that you ignore every response illustrates that

 

[ThisIsMe]

Your bullshit has been responded to and you just talk past me

Your attempts to throw red herrings out there and muddy the water have failed

The fact that you ignore every response illustrates that

I'm not ignoring your responses. I get it, you had a maga killed and that's good enough for you. Others might want to understand the underlying questions.

 

[Rawley]

Really.? Show us this barricade he breached

I don’t see it

Go with it. Assume he breached a barricade and there are innocents behind the officer. Lesh says gun the motherfucker down.

Be honest, that is exactly what you are saying. Violent mob, breached barricade, innocents behind you - jump directly to lethal force.

 

[Lesh]

I'm not ignoring your responses. I get it, you had a maga killed and that's good enough for you. Others might want to understand the underlying questions.

That’s all. I said? Are you that stupid?

You keep “wondering ” why Byrd didn’t have a tazer on him but can’t respond to my response

I asked if you know what equipment a plain clothes CP Lieutenant is outfitted with .

You just keep asking why he didn’t have a tazer as if you somehow know he should have. Why? Have you ever seen a Police Lieutenant in plain clothes with a tazer?

And why would you think a tazer would have been an effective deterrent? If he has tazed Ashes there would have been nothing to stop the next attacker coming through that blown out window… or the next one or the next one.

The SHOCK of that gun firing stopped that attack cold. A tazer would likely not had the same effect and you “seem” smart enough to know that.

So just stop

You have failed and embarrassed yourself and impugned your honesty

 

[Lesh]

Go with it. Assume he breached a barricade and there are innocents behind the officer. Lesh says gun the motherfucker down.

Be honest, that is exactly what you are saying. Violent mob, breached barricade, innocents behind you - jump directly to lethal force.

You want to assume something you made up?

No

You mention honesty but have none

 

[Rawley]

You want to assume something you made up?

No

You mention honesty but have none

All right Diogenes, what did I get wrong on the Lesh rule? Violent mob, breached barricade, innocents behind you - jump directly to lethal force, shoot to kill.

 

[Lesh]

All right Diogenes, what did I get wrong on the Lesh rule? Violent mob, breached barricade, innocents behind you - jump directly to lethal force, shoot to kill.

What did you get wrong?

You posted a picture of a guy getting maced by a cop and claimed he had breached a Police Barricade

There was no barricade . You lied

 

[Crepitus]

bullshit

and the situation on Jan 6 had nothing to do with 'Stand your Ground.'

You brought it up, idiot.

 

[Crepitus]

What did you get wrong?

You posted a picture of a guy getting maced by a cop and claimed he had breached a Police Barricade

There was no barricade . You lied

They do that all the time.

 

[Crepitus]

And yet you supported the Burn Loot Murder rioters.

Actually no. Burning and looting is bad. They should be prosecuted.