Trump Was Right

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
The US illegally took over the Ukraine in 2014 with bribes and weapon.
Russia still did nothing until Kyiv violated treaties, like trying to block use of Sevastopol, or trying to join NATO.

WRONG.

The US NEVER took over Ukraine. There is no evidence of bribes and the only weapons were sent after Purin invaded.

There was no such treaty or treaty violation

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
The Allies started WWII by stealing half of Germany in the illegal Treaty of Versailles, and illegally embargoing steel, oil, coal, and food to Japan.

And coastal Chinese cities can not be held without a full land invasion that Japan could never do.

WRONG.

The treaty was legal as was the embargoe

Yes chindese coastal cities can be held without a full lan d invasion and they WERE IN fact held without such an invasion

Everything you say is a proven LIE

germany and japan started it that is fact

 

[Rigby5]

WRONG

It clearly WAS US and your claim was that we did get involved until normandy

You said that LIE in order to support your bullshgit claim whcih I proved WRONG

You always dream up lies to mask your galactic stupidity

It is easy to prove we did not defeat Germany.
Just look at the tanks the Germans sent west.
They were obsolete Pz.Kpfw. IVs.
The only time we saw a Panther, Tiger, or King Tiger, was the Battle of the Bulge.

 

[Soupnazi630]

It is easy to prove we did not defeat Germany.
Just look at the tanks the Germans sent west.
They were obsolete Pz.Kpfw. IVs.
The only time we saw a Panther, Tiger, or King Tiger, was the Battle of the Bulge.

WRONG.

They were not obselete.

It is also irrelevant whether it was before or after the battle of the bulge they DID send them west.

In fact they had them deplyed on the western front DURING NORMANDY

You have utterly FAILED to prove any such thing

 

[Rigby5]

Im well aware of that.

The ignorant douche I was argueing with is the one in need os a lesson

The US was no real threat.
Sherman tanks were pretty worthless.
The Germans were already defeated and just retreating after Kursk.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The US was no real threat.
Sherman tanks were pretty worthless.
The Germans were already defeated and just retreating after Kursk.

WRONG,

The US was crucial to their defeat in both world wars and gthe Sherman was one of the finest tanks ever made.

They were far from defeated FOOL

 

[Rigby5]

WRONG.

The US NEVER took over Ukraine. There is no evidence of bribes and the only weapons were sent after Purin invaded.

There was no such treaty or treaty violation

Wrong
The government elected in 2012 was the only legal one.
The evidence of bribes is obvious, like Burisma Holdings and firing Shokin.

Trying to join NATO not only is a treaty violation, but a war crime.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong
The government elected in 2012 was the only legal one.
The evidence of bribes is obvious, like Burisma Holdings and firing Shokin.

Trying to join NATO not only is a treaty violation, but a war crime.

Wrong.

it was no more legal than the current one.

There is no evidence whatsoever of bribes.

There was no treaty forbidding them from joining NATO. NO SUCH TREATY EXISTED.

It is not a crime off any kind in war or peace they had every right to join NATO


You are a liar and wrong

 

[Rigby5]

WRONG.

The treaty was legal as was the embargoe

Yes chindese coastal cities can be held without a full lan d invasion and they WERE IN fact held without such an invasion

Everything you say is a proven LIE

germany and japan started it that is fact

The Allies illegally started WWI, it was illegal to starve Germany into surrender, it was illegal to take East Prussia, etc.
The 1906 Geneva Convention makes embargoes illegal except or weapons.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The Allies illegally started WWI, it was illegal to starve Germany into surrender, it was illegal to take East Prussia, etc.
The 1906 Geneva Convention makes embargoes illegal except or weapons.

The allies did not start WWI.

It was and is legal to do all of those things

 

[Rigby5]

WRONG.

They were not obselete.

It is also irrelevant whether it was before or after the battle of the bulge they DID send them west.

In fact they had them deplyed on the western front DURING NORMANDY

You have utterly FAILED to prove any such thing

Wrong.
After the Battle of the Bulge, all the good tanks went back to the eastern front.
Normandy was virtually unopposed.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
After the Battle of the Bulge, all the good tanks went back to the eastern front.
Normandy was virtually unopposed.

No they did not.

Normandy was massively opposed and that opposition included tigers and panthers.

Tiger II - The Tank Museum

The combination of devastating firepower and thick sloped armour plate on the Tiger II, made it a formidable adversary for Allied forces on the battlefield.

tankmuseum.org

Your claims are a lies
AS ALWAYS

You are wrong

 

[Rigby5]

WRONG,

The US was crucial to their defeat in both world wars and gthe Sherman was one of the finest tanks ever made.

They were far from defeated FOOL

The Sherman was junk.
Its short 75mm gun could not knock out something like Panther, much less a King Tiger.
The British regunned some, called Fireflys, but they still were badly armored, flat sided, and fire traps..

 

[boevans]

Funny how the only one in prison for collusion with Russia is a Trump hating Democrat.

Does not matter. You are always pulling Putin and Trump's rods.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The Sherman was junk.
Its short 75mm gun could not knock out something like Panther, much less a King Tiger.
The British regunned some, called Fireflys, but they still were badly armored, flat sided, and fire traps..

It was one of the finest tanks ever made

They did in fact knock out tigers and panthers even if they had to work at it.

The fact is that armor and cannon is not what makes a great tank. It is mechnical dependability. The Sherman was easier to repaior and more reliable than any tank in history.
The crews could keep them runningendlessly with pliers a wrench and a crow bar.

On the other hand the tigers and panthers broke down every five miles and required massive overhaul to make them run a little further is why Many were captured AT NORMANDY

you are a fucking fool and liar

 

[Rigby5]

Which we recovered from and continued to attack

What you ignore is that it was years before normandy you stupid lying motherfucker

Wrong.
The Germans left North Africa after defeating the US forces there, because the forces were needed in the eastern front.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
The Germans left North Africa after defeating the US forces there, because the forces were needed in the eastern front.

Wrong dumbass they did not leave they were DEFEATED in North Africa

 

[Rigby5]

It was one of the finest tanks ever made

They did in fact knock out tigers and panthers even if they had to work at it.

The fact is that armor and cannon is not what makes a great tank. It is mechnical dependability. The Sherman was easier to repaior and more reliable than any tank in history.
The crews could keep them runningendlessly with pliers a wrench and a crow bar.

On the other hand the tigers and panthers broke down every five miles and required massive overhaul to make them run a little further is why Many were captured AT NORMANDY

you are a fucking fool and liar

None were captured at Normandy.
The ones defeated were taken out by air power.

 

[Soupnazi630]

None were captured at Normandy.
The ones defeated were taken out by air power.

I already posted a link proving some were captured at Normandy and even if some were taken out by air power it proves they were there.

Which makes you a liar as you claimed none were at Normandy

 

[Rigby5]

The allies did not start WWI.

It was and is legal to do all of those things

The Allies assassinate Archduke Ferdinand and his wife, and attacked southern Germany first.