Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What an idiot.This week - Seriously?
Trump says he will try to hold rallies in Florida and Pennsylvania this weekend
They would be his first public engagement since contracting coronavirus.nypost.com
and you have yet to show where in the constitution that authority exist,,, general welfare doesnt cut it when they are providing a service,,,
I thought we were talking about medicare??and you have yet to show where in the constitution that authority exist,,, general welfare doesnt cut it when they are providing a service,,,
Helvering v. Davis - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Helvering_v._Davis
Davis, 301 U.S. 619 (1937), was a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that held that Social Security was constitutionally permissible as an exercise of the federal power to spend for the general welfare and so did not contravene the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
maybe you should point me to where in the constitution they are allowed to single out a specific group of people for special favors???
based on the 9-10th amendments the burden is on you,,,
youre repeating yourself,,,maybe you should point me to where in the constitution they are allowed to single out a specific group of people for special favors???
based on the 9-10th amendments the burden is on you,,,
That was settled over 80 years ago.
Helvering v. Davis - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Helvering_v._Davis
Davis, 301 U.S. 619 (1937), was a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that held that Social Security was constitutionally permissible as an exercise of the federal power to spend for the general welfare and so did not contravene the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
I thought we were talking about medicare??
even so SCOTUS once said slavery was legal,,,
I reject both,,,
tell ya what,, you get the feds to provide my guns and ammo and I will let your stuff stand,,,I thought we were talking about medicare??
even so SCOTUS once said slavery was legal,,,
I reject both,,,
Health Care: Constitutional Rights and Legislative Powers ...
09 — The Medicare program, established as Title XVIII of the Social Security Act in 1965, is the largest health care program enacted by Congress ...
” Because Medicare was an amendment to the Social Security Act, it is also constitutional,
Because it answers two separate posts. Both for 9th and 10 amendments, and for upholding the constitutionalityyoure repeating yourself,,,
keep in mind SCOTUS give opinions not law,,,and those opinions can change in time,,,Because it answers two separate posts. Both for 9th and 10 amendments, and for upholding the constitutionalityyoure repeating yourself,,,
Strange....how they all started coming down with it while he was in the hospital....yet you folks are blaming Trump.26 infections in Trumps staff hasn’t happened?and yet it still hasnt happened,,,you keep calling them super spreaders and it keeps not happening,,, WTF???This week - Seriously?
Trump says he will try to hold rallies in Florida and Pennsylvania this weekend
They would be his first public engagement since contracting coronavirus.
Even Fauci called them Super Spreaders
Actually like the right to vote (15th / 19th / 26th) there is no requirement that the federal government subsidize it.tell ya what,, you get the feds to provide my guns and ammo and I will let your stuff stand,,,
it is a stated right after all and yours arent,,,
same applies to your stuff,,, but at least mines listed,,,Actually like the right to vote (15th / 19th / 26th) there is no requirement that the federal government subsidize it.tell ya what,, you get the feds to provide my guns and ammo and I will let your stuff stand,,,
it is a stated right after all and yours arent,,,
Is it SS Trump, or Trump SS, or both?This week - Seriously?
Trump says he will try to hold rallies in Florida and Pennsylvania this weekend
They would be his first public engagement since contracting coronavirus.
I've shown that the federal government can provide rights, without having to pay or subsidize them. They can also provide "general welfare" on a "citizens only" or limited group basis.same applies to your stuff,,, but at least mines listed,,,Actually like the right to vote (15th / 19th / 26th) there is no requirement that the federal government subsidize it.tell ya what,, you get the feds to provide my guns and ammo and I will let your stuff stand,,,
it is a stated right after all and yours arent,,,
the government doesnt provide rights our humanity provides them,,I've shown that the federal government can provide rights, without having to pay or subsidize them. They can also provide "general welfare" on a "citizens only" or limited group basis.same applies to your stuff,,, but at least mines listed,,,Actually like the right to vote (15th / 19th / 26th) there is no requirement that the federal government subsidize it.tell ya what,, you get the feds to provide my guns and ammo and I will let your stuff stand,,,
it is a stated right after all and yours arent,,,
May I add, the right to bear arms, is only for a limited group.
its the governments job to protect those rights and forcibly taking from me to give to another violates every right I have,,,
I disagree with that,,,its the governments job to protect those rights and forcibly taking from me to give to another violates every right I have,,,
The government has the power to draft people into forced military service, to protect the rights of others.
That is against everything you said you said about peoples rights.
you keep calling them super spreaders and it keeps not happening,,, WTF???This week - Seriously?
Trump says he will try to hold rallies in Florida and Pennsylvania this weekend
They would be his first public engagement since contracting coronavirus.
Even Fauci called them Super Spreaders
The government has the power to draft people into forced military service, to protect the rights of others.
That is against everything you said you said about peoples rights.
Of course you disagree. It makes your previous position look like the unthinking reasoning of a child demanding a piece of candy because he saw another child get one.I disagree with that,,,
