Trump supporters: If Trump broke the law, should he be held legally accountable?

Nope...the "rule of law," was changed when the FBI used false information to get 4 FISA warrants against Trump and his people....the "Rule of Law," was changed when joe biden and his son were given a pass on their illegal activity and National Security crimes.....

When you have one side getting a complete pass for obvious illegal activity....and you get the full court press against the opponents/enemies of those same individuals...you do not have the "rule of law."

When we have the rule of law back...then we can go after Trump and his crimes.......

When one side, the democrat party, is using the agencies of the government to harrass, arrest, and prosecute their enemies...you can sell you "so much for the rule of law," B.S. when it comes to going after Trump.......
More equivocation. You people are boring as hell.
 
You mean like when the FBI knowingly used false information provided by hilary clinton to lie to a Federal Judge to get 4 illegal FISA warrants?

You mean like that?

The US has been monitoring Russian embassies for 60 years.
 
Now Trump is claiming the FBI planted evidence.

Of course the Republicans would call a whistle blower or a person revealing evidence of criminal activity "a traitor".
They are running their political party like they are the fucking Corleone family.
 

Of course the Republicans would call a whistle blower or a person revealing evidence of criminal activity "a traitor".
They are running their political party like they are the fucking Corleone family.
The FBI and the DOJ are being run like the Corleone family.
 

Of course the Republicans would call a whistle blower or a person revealing evidence of criminal activity "a traitor".
They are running their political party like they are the fucking Corleone family.
Business Insider is the one who used the term "traitor," not any Trump supporters, douchebag.
 
rotfl-gif.288736
No one is impressed with our psychotic laughter.
 
You mean like when the FBI knowingly used false information provided by hilary clinton to lie to a Federal Judge to get 4 illegal FISA warrants?
Prove it.

Here is a fair accounting of the matter.

If you only read the executive summary of the Justice Department inspector general’s latest report on the FBI’s handling of FISA applications, the headlines the report has generated make sense. “Justice Department inspector general finds 'widespread' failures in FBI surveillance requests,” says U.S.A Today. The Washington Post put it in a slightly wonkier fashion: “Inspector general finds ‘widespread’ problems in FBI’s FISA applications.”

Inspector General Michael Horowitz invited such dire headlines with the manner in which he wrote his executive summary, which fails in important respects to reflect the body of the report it precedes. The report describes a large volume of mostly technical mistakes, none of which affected the adjudication of any surveillance application.

 

First president to be impeached twice. First president to attempt a coup d'état. First president to have his home searched by the FBI. First president to take the Fifth.​

It's just so impressive.

You know how much he loves being "first".


First President to bury his ex-wife on a golf course

First president not to attend inauguration of the president

https://twitter.com/MamaLew9/status/1557411306327744513/photo/1

https://twitter.com/AnnBieb/status/1557417644965433349/photo/1

https://twitter.com/gtconway3d/status/1557395603767844864
 
They didn't use the FISA warrants to monitor Russians, they lied to get FISA warrants to spy on their political enemies...
Your lie, a direct result of consuming lies from right wing media, is exemplary of what is killing this country. See post #756.
 

Forum List

Back
Top