Trump signs exec order to limit immigration from Iran, Iraq, Syria, Somalia, Yemen, Sudan & Libya

[Dschrute3]

And seriously, who's idea was it to bring in Thousands of people from insanely dangerous countries like Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and so on? Had to be a Globalist maniac. Thank God we have Trump now.

Well, I guess that it is OK. If they were Jews, then people would compare Trump to Hitler, but they aren't, so Trump is not Hitler. Nope! No comparison at all.

The US President is supposed to serve American Citizens' interests first. Allowing Thousands of people in from these dangerous countries is beyond irresponsible. It could be called treasonous. These are Terror-Haven nations. Until they get their terrorism problems under control, there should be no Immigration at all allowed from these nations. Trump's got it right. He's looking out for Americans. I'm proud of him.

Well, there are 1.2 billion of them, and it might be a good idea not to alienate them all until we stockpile some more bullets. But, I know that the Trumpettes have priorities, and based on what I read on these pages all the time, there seems to be a debate among them as to whether to mount machine guns on the Southern Border, or to kill and torture Muslims. Once you guys sort that out, I am sure that the problems will be solved.

Well, now you're just goin loony. Try laying off the Democrat Fake News. This action should have been taken a long time ago. There is no upside for Americans in taking in Thousands from these very dangerous countries. It's an incredibly dangerous gamble at best.

The number one goal has to be protecting Americans. When or if these countries get their Terrorism problems under control, we can consider resuming regular Immigration. But till then, i wouldn't support anyone being allowed in.

 

[Vandalshandle]

And seriously, who's idea was it to bring in Thousands of people from insanely dangerous countries like Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and so on? Had to be a Globalist maniac. Thank God we have Trump now.

Well, I guess that it is OK. If they were Jews, then people would compare Trump to Hitler, but they aren't, so Trump is not Hitler. Nope! No comparison at all.

The US President is supposed to serve American Citizens' interests first. Allowing Thousands of people in from these dangerous countries is beyond irresponsible. It could be called treasonous. These are Terror-Haven nations. Until they get their terrorism problems under control, there should be no Immigration at all allowed from these nations. Trump's got it right. He's looking out for Americans. I'm proud of him.

Well, there are 1.2 billion of them, and it might be a good idea not to alienate them all until we stockpile some more bullets. But, I know that the Trumpettes have priorities, and based on what I read on these pages all the time, there seems to be a debate among them as to whether to mount machine guns on the Southern Border, or to kill and torture Muslims. Once you guys sort that out, I am sure that the problems will be solved.

Well, now you're just goin loony. Try laying off the Democrat Fake News. This action should have been taken a long time ago. There is no upside for Americans in taking in Thousands from these very dangerous countries. It's an incredibly dangerous gamble at best.

The number one goal has to be protecting Americans. When or if these countries get their Terrorism problems under control, we can consider resuming regular Immigration. But till then, i wouldn't support anyone being allowed in.

Understood. Given a choice of giving a refuge to someone almost certain to be killed, and risking the incredibly remote chance that a terrorist or undesirable will sneak in, you will ban them all. Nothing new about that:

Voyage of the St. Louis

 

[Indeependent]

And seriously, who's idea was it to bring in Thousands of people from insanely dangerous countries like Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and so on? Had to be a Globalist maniac. Thank God we have Trump now.

Well, I guess that it is OK. If they were Jews, then people would compare Trump to Hitler, but they aren't, so Trump is not Hitler. Nope! No comparison at all.

The US President is supposed to serve American Citizens' interests first. Allowing Thousands of people in from these dangerous countries is beyond irresponsible. It could be called treasonous. These are Terror-Haven nations. Until they get their terrorism problems under control, there should be no Immigration at all allowed from these nations. Trump's got it right. He's looking out for Americans. I'm proud of him.

Well, there are 1.2 billion of them, and it might be a good idea not to alienate them all until we stockpile some more bullets. But, I know that the Trumpettes have priorities, and based on what I read on these pages all the time, there seems to be a debate among them as to whether to mount machine guns on the Southern Border, or to kill and torture Muslims. Once you guys sort that out, I am sure that the problems will be solved.

Well, now you're just goin loony. Try laying off the Democrat Fake News. This action should have been taken a long time ago. There is no upside for Americans in taking in Thousands from these very dangerous countries. It's an incredibly dangerous gamble at best.

The number one goal has to be protecting Americans. When or if these countries get their Terrorism problems under control, we can consider resuming regular Immigration. But till then, i wouldn't support anyone being allowed in.

Understood. Given a choice of giving a refuge to someone almost certain to be killed, and risking the incredibly remote chance that a terrorist or undesirable will sneak in, you will ban them all. Nothing new about that:

Voyage of the St. Louis

We all know already that you thrive on cheap labor.

 

[Vandalshandle]

Well, I guess that it is OK. If they were Jews, then people would compare Trump to Hitler, but they aren't, so Trump is not Hitler. Nope! No comparison at all.

The US President is supposed to serve American Citizens' interests first. Allowing Thousands of people in from these dangerous countries is beyond irresponsible. It could be called treasonous. These are Terror-Haven nations. Until they get their terrorism problems under control, there should be no Immigration at all allowed from these nations. Trump's got it right. He's looking out for Americans. I'm proud of him.

Well, there are 1.2 billion of them, and it might be a good idea not to alienate them all until we stockpile some more bullets. But, I know that the Trumpettes have priorities, and based on what I read on these pages all the time, there seems to be a debate among them as to whether to mount machine guns on the Southern Border, or to kill and torture Muslims. Once you guys sort that out, I am sure that the problems will be solved.

Well, now you're just goin loony. Try laying off the Democrat Fake News. This action should have been taken a long time ago. There is no upside for Americans in taking in Thousands from these very dangerous countries. It's an incredibly dangerous gamble at best.

The number one goal has to be protecting Americans. When or if these countries get their Terrorism problems under control, we can consider resuming regular Immigration. But till then, i wouldn't support anyone being allowed in.

Understood. Given a choice of giving a refuge to someone almost certain to be killed, and risking the incredibly remote chance that a terrorist or undesirable will sneak in, you will ban them all. Nothing new about that:

Voyage of the St. Louis

We all know already that you thrive on cheap labor.

But, you, of course, always insist on paying Fair Market coffee prices at Starbucks. I'm sure that you would have it no other way.

 

[Indeependent]

The US President is supposed to serve American Citizens' interests first. Allowing Thousands of people in from these dangerous countries is beyond irresponsible. It could be called treasonous. These are Terror-Haven nations. Until they get their terrorism problems under control, there should be no Immigration at all allowed from these nations. Trump's got it right. He's looking out for Americans. I'm proud of him.

Well, there are 1.2 billion of them, and it might be a good idea not to alienate them all until we stockpile some more bullets. But, I know that the Trumpettes have priorities, and based on what I read on these pages all the time, there seems to be a debate among them as to whether to mount machine guns on the Southern Border, or to kill and torture Muslims. Once you guys sort that out, I am sure that the problems will be solved.

Well, now you're just goin loony. Try laying off the Democrat Fake News. This action should have been taken a long time ago. There is no upside for Americans in taking in Thousands from these very dangerous countries. It's an incredibly dangerous gamble at best.

The number one goal has to be protecting Americans. When or if these countries get their Terrorism problems under control, we can consider resuming regular Immigration. But till then, i wouldn't support anyone being allowed in.

Understood. Given a choice of giving a refuge to someone almost certain to be killed, and risking the incredibly remote chance that a terrorist or undesirable will sneak in, you will ban them all. Nothing new about that:

Voyage of the St. Louis

We all know already that you thrive on cheap labor.

But, you, of course, always insist on paying Fair Market coffee prices at Starbucks. I'm sure that you would have it no other way.

I will have it NO OTHER WAY; I treat all human beings with DIGNITY, unlike a narcissistic asshole like you.

 

[Dschrute3]

And seriously, who's idea was it to bring in Thousands of people from insanely dangerous countries like Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and so on? Had to be a Globalist maniac. Thank God we have Trump now.

Well, I guess that it is OK. If they were Jews, then people would compare Trump to Hitler, but they aren't, so Trump is not Hitler. Nope! No comparison at all.

The US President is supposed to serve American Citizens' interests first. Allowing Thousands of people in from these dangerous countries is beyond irresponsible. It could be called treasonous. These are Terror-Haven nations. Until they get their terrorism problems under control, there should be no Immigration at all allowed from these nations. Trump's got it right. He's looking out for Americans. I'm proud of him.

Well, there are 1.2 billion of them, and it might be a good idea not to alienate them all until we stockpile some more bullets. But, I know that the Trumpettes have priorities, and based on what I read on these pages all the time, there seems to be a debate among them as to whether to mount machine guns on the Southern Border, or to kill and torture Muslims. Once you guys sort that out, I am sure that the problems will be solved.

Well, now you're just goin loony. Try laying off the Democrat Fake News. This action should have been taken a long time ago. There is no upside for Americans in taking in Thousands from these very dangerous countries. It's an incredibly dangerous gamble at best.

The number one goal has to be protecting Americans. When or if these countries get their Terrorism problems under control, we can consider resuming regular Immigration. But till then, i wouldn't support anyone being allowed in.

Understood. Given a choice of giving a refuge to someone almost certain to be killed, and risking the incredibly remote chance that a terrorist or undesirable will sneak in, you will ban them all. Nothing new about that:

Voyage of the St. Louis

Sorry, but my #1 priority is protecting Americans. Why take such dangerous risks? The risk/reward doesn't work for me on this. When or if those countries get their shit together, we'll talk about resuming regular Immigration with them.

 

[Dragonlady]

Well, there are 1.2 billion of them, and it might be a good idea not to alienate them all until we stockpile some more bullets. But, I know that the Trumpettes have priorities, and based on what I read on these pages all the time, there seems to be a debate among them as to whether to mount machine guns on the Southern Border, or to kill and torture Muslims. Once you guys sort that out, I am sure that the problems will be solved.

Well, now you're just goin loony. Try laying off the Democrat Fake News. This action should have been taken a long time ago. There is no upside for Americans in taking in Thousands from these very dangerous countries. It's an incredibly dangerous gamble at best.

The number one goal has to be protecting Americans. When or if these countries get their Terrorism problems under control, we can consider resuming regular Immigration. But till then, i wouldn't support anyone being allowed in.

Understood. Given a choice of giving a refuge to someone almost certain to be killed, and risking the incredibly remote chance that a terrorist or undesirable will sneak in, you will ban them all. Nothing new about that:

Voyage of the St. Louis

We all know already that you thrive on cheap labor.

But, you, of course, always insist on paying Fair Market coffee prices at Starbucks. I'm sure that you would have it no other way.

I will have it NO OTHER WAY; I treat all human beings with DIGNITY, unlike a narcissistic asshole like you.

No you don't. You would deny those seeking freedom from tyrany and death, any opportunity to do so. Why? Because you're afraid. 96% of the terrorist acts in the United States of America are committed by people who are NOT Muslims. Most are committed by white Christian males with guns. And the last time I looked, none of those were being banned.

 

[Vandalshandle]

Well, there are 1.2 billion of them, and it might be a good idea not to alienate them all until we stockpile some more bullets. But, I know that the Trumpettes have priorities, and based on what I read on these pages all the time, there seems to be a debate among them as to whether to mount machine guns on the Southern Border, or to kill and torture Muslims. Once you guys sort that out, I am sure that the problems will be solved.

Well, now you're just goin loony. Try laying off the Democrat Fake News. This action should have been taken a long time ago. There is no upside for Americans in taking in Thousands from these very dangerous countries. It's an incredibly dangerous gamble at best.

The number one goal has to be protecting Americans. When or if these countries get their Terrorism problems under control, we can consider resuming regular Immigration. But till then, i wouldn't support anyone being allowed in.

Understood. Given a choice of giving a refuge to someone almost certain to be killed, and risking the incredibly remote chance that a terrorist or undesirable will sneak in, you will ban them all. Nothing new about that:

Voyage of the St. Louis

We all know already that you thrive on cheap labor.

But, you, of course, always insist on paying Fair Market coffee prices at Starbucks. I'm sure that you would have it no other way.

I will have it NO OTHER WAY; I treat all human beings with DIGNITY, unlike a narcissistic asshole like you.

And, indeed, the dignity with which you treat all human beings shines through like a searchlight in your post to me!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Clementine]

No Muslim countries are stepping up to help refugees. Some say they don't want terrorists. Only reason to seed Muslims over the rest of the world is to help with their quest to spread and multiply. No way should we help them do that.

 

[Indeependent]

Well, now you're just goin loony. Try laying off the Democrat Fake News. This action should have been taken a long time ago. There is no upside for Americans in taking in Thousands from these very dangerous countries. It's an incredibly dangerous gamble at best.

The number one goal has to be protecting Americans. When or if these countries get their Terrorism problems under control, we can consider resuming regular Immigration. But till then, i wouldn't support anyone being allowed in.

Understood. Given a choice of giving a refuge to someone almost certain to be killed, and risking the incredibly remote chance that a terrorist or undesirable will sneak in, you will ban them all. Nothing new about that:

Voyage of the St. Louis

We all know already that you thrive on cheap labor.

But, you, of course, always insist on paying Fair Market coffee prices at Starbucks. I'm sure that you would have it no other way.

I will have it NO OTHER WAY; I treat all human beings with DIGNITY, unlike a narcissistic asshole like you.

No you don't. You would deny those seeking freedom from tyrany and death, any opportunity to do so. Why? Because you're afraid. 96% of the terrorist acts in the United States of America are committed by people who are NOT Muslims. Most are committed by white Christian males with guns. And the last time I looked, none of those were being banned.

Sorry, missy, but these people are taking jobs and taxes away from those who have been born in the USA.
Americans first.
When we get our house in order, then we'll consider letting them in.
And for your intellectual edification, I pay American wages to anybody who does work for me.

 

[Indeependent]

Well, now you're just goin loony. Try laying off the Democrat Fake News. This action should have been taken a long time ago. There is no upside for Americans in taking in Thousands from these very dangerous countries. It's an incredibly dangerous gamble at best.

The number one goal has to be protecting Americans. When or if these countries get their Terrorism problems under control, we can consider resuming regular Immigration. But till then, i wouldn't support anyone being allowed in.

Understood. Given a choice of giving a refuge to someone almost certain to be killed, and risking the incredibly remote chance that a terrorist or undesirable will sneak in, you will ban them all. Nothing new about that:

Voyage of the St. Louis

We all know already that you thrive on cheap labor.

But, you, of course, always insist on paying Fair Market coffee prices at Starbucks. I'm sure that you would have it no other way.

I will have it NO OTHER WAY; I treat all human beings with DIGNITY, unlike a narcissistic asshole like you.

And, indeed, the dignity with which you treat all human beings shines through like a searchlight in your post to me!!!!!!!!!!!!

Seriously, what respect do you deserve when your postings consistently drip with the desire for cheap labor?

 

[Vandalshandle]

View attachment 109269


No Muslim countries are stepping up to help refugees. Some say they don't want terrorists. Only reason to seed Muslims over the rest of the world is to help with their quest to spread and multiply. No way should we help them do that.

By all means! Let us use other Muslim countries as our role models!

 

[Vandalshandle]

Understood. Given a choice of giving a refuge to someone almost certain to be killed, and risking the incredibly remote chance that a terrorist or undesirable will sneak in, you will ban them all. Nothing new about that:

Voyage of the St. Louis

We all know already that you thrive on cheap labor.

But, you, of course, always insist on paying Fair Market coffee prices at Starbucks. I'm sure that you would have it no other way.

I will have it NO OTHER WAY; I treat all human beings with DIGNITY, unlike a narcissistic asshole like you.

No you don't. You would deny those seeking freedom from tyrany and death, any opportunity to do so. Why? Because you're afraid. 96% of the terrorist acts in the United States of America are committed by people who are NOT Muslims. Most are committed by white Christian males with guns. And the last time I looked, none of those were being banned.

Sorry, missy, but these people are taking jobs and taxes away from those who have been born in the USA.
Americans first.
When we get our house in order, then we'll consider letting them in.
And for your intellectual edification, I pay American wages to anybody who does work for me.

Well, I hope you treat the assholes with the same dignity you treat me!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Indeependent]

We all know already that you thrive on cheap labor.

But, you, of course, always insist on paying Fair Market coffee prices at Starbucks. I'm sure that you would have it no other way.

I will have it NO OTHER WAY; I treat all human beings with DIGNITY, unlike a narcissistic asshole like you.

No you don't. You would deny those seeking freedom from tyrany and death, any opportunity to do so. Why? Because you're afraid. 96% of the terrorist acts in the United States of America are committed by people who are NOT Muslims. Most are committed by white Christian males with guns. And the last time I looked, none of those were being banned.

Sorry, missy, but these people are taking jobs and taxes away from those who have been born in the USA.
Americans first.
When we get our house in order, then we'll consider letting them in.
And for your intellectual edification, I pay American wages to anybody who does work for me.

Well, I hope you treat the assholes with the same dignity you treat me!!!!!!!!!!!

I do.
I can't stand neo-Cons and I go out of my way to humiliate them even though they are sociopaths and immune to emotion.

 

[jon_berzerk]

Americans are now safe from terrorist attacks. WOO!

Exclusive: Trump expected to sign executive orders on immigration

actually he is going to enforce obamas 2016 act same exact countries obama penned

in 2016 and did nothing about

 

[Vandalshandle]

So, now I am a neo-con? Damn! i hope that the folks at democratic headquarters don't take away my voter registration card! Can I use your quote in my sig? I need proof for those on the board that call me a commie....

 

[Indeependent]

So, now I am a neo-con? Damn! i hope that the folks at democratic headquarters don't take away my voter registration card!

Even a Liberal can be a Neo-Con...The part that suffers from Greed and Avarice and lack of respect for human beings.

 

[Dragonlady]

Americans are now safe from terrorist attacks. WOO!

Exclusive: Trump expected to sign executive orders on immigration

actually he is going to enforce obamas 2016 act same exact countries obama penned

in 2016 and did nothing about

He signed EO's banning all Muslim immigration and immigration from 7 Middle Eastern countries. This has NOTHING to do with Obama's 2016 Immigration Law at all. This is his unConstitutional religious discrimination.

 

[Vandalshandle]

So, now I am a neo-con? Damn! i hope that the folks at democratic headquarters don't take away my voter registration card!

Even a Liberal can be a Neo-Con...The part that suffers from Greed and Avarice and lack of respect for human beings.

Tell me, Carnac, the Magnificent, what is my religious persuasion, state of birth, position on women's rights, and favorite soft drink?

 

[Indeependent]

So, now I am a neo-con? Damn! i hope that the folks at democratic headquarters don't take away my voter registration card!

Even a Liberal can be a Neo-Con...The part that suffers from Greed and Avarice and lack of respect for human beings.

Tell me, Carnac, the Magnificent, what is my religious persuasion, state of birth, position on women's rights, and favorite soft drink?

Who give's a damn...you have complete disregard for foreigners when it pads your wallet.