Trump Sets Up Members Of Congress By Releasing Completely Unredacted Epstein Files......And They Fell Into The Trap

[mudwhistle]

Good lord, this is wacky.



It would be nice if there was any proof of this narrative.

. . . and if there is, and this narrative is true, (which I highly doubt it is, it reeks of Qnon garbage,) the administration violated all of congresses' forth amendment right.

I saw the same story on Facebook from another source.

Choose not to believe it if you wish.

That's not my problem.

 

[postman]

You're ignoring the fact that anyone who took a bribe or an out of court settlement won't convince a jury of jack squat.

Look up Alan Weisselberg.

Business Fraud Trial (Oct 2023): Cohen testified that he and Weisselberg were tasked by Trump to "reverse engineer" financial statements to inflate asset values.

Hush-Money Trial (May 2024): Cohen described a meeting with Weisselberg and Trump where the reimbursement plan for the $130,000 hush money was established. He stated he relied on Weisselberg to handle the payments.

 

[postman]

I saw the same story on Facebook from another source.

Choose not to believe it if you wish.

That's not my problem.

You believe facebook, but not GOOGLE AI.

 

[MisterBeale]

Members of Congress demand DOJ stop tracking lawmakers' Epstein files searches

Attorney General Pam Bondi took a document referring to Rep. Pramila Jayapal's search history to a House Judiciary Committee hearing Wednesday.

www.nbcnews.com

House members seek inquiry into DoJ’s tracking of their Epstein files research

US attorney general displayed records of Congress members’ searches into Epstein files during House hearing

www.theguardian.com

Loading…

thehill.com

DOJ Accused of Surveilling Lawmakers' Epstein Files Searches

Photos from a Wednesday House hearing appear to suggest that the department is tracking lawmakers' search histories.

time.com

Loading…

www.forbes.com

 

[postman]

Members of Congress demand DOJ stop tracking lawmakers' Epstein files searches

Attorney General Pam Bondi took a document referring to Rep. Pramila Jayapal's search history to a House Judiciary Committee hearing Wednesday.

www.nbcnews.com

House members seek inquiry into DoJ’s tracking of their Epstein files research

US attorney general displayed records of Congress members’ searches into Epstein files during House hearing

www.theguardian.com

Loading…

thehill.com

DOJ Accused of Surveilling Lawmakers' Epstein Files Searches

Photos from a Wednesday House hearing appear to suggest that the department is tracking lawmakers' search histories.

time.com

Loading…

www.forbes.com

Congress should pass a law, like they did with the january 6th phone location searches, where congressmen could sue for $500,000 for each time they were tracked.

Original Provision: Allowed senators to claim $500,000
per violation if the DOJ obtained their phone records without notifying the senator's office, with retroactivity to 2022.

 

[MisterBeale]

I saw the same story on Facebook from another source.

Choose not to believe it if you wish.

Unless you have a link that has evidence of this narrative, it is just gossip from Qanon types that need a narrative to cope with cognitive dissonance affecting their hopium addiction.


Has anyone in Trump's orbit, or his administration been saying that this is what is going on?

Is this information coming out of Jeffrey's best pal, Bannon's show? Where does this narrative originate? Is it from anyone, "in the know," close to Trump?

If not? It is just an exercise in cope, and this conspiracy theory belongs in the proper sub-forum.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Congress should pass a law, like they did with the january 6th phone location searches, where congressmen could sue for $500,000 for each time they were tracked.

Original Provision: Allowed senators to claim $500,000
per violation if the DOJ obtained their phone records without notifying the senator's office, with retroactivity to 2022.

Why? They deserve no special protections like that.

 

[postman]

Why? They deserve no special protections like that.

I think DOJ monitoring, and making public their search histories is a 4th amendment violation.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I think DOJ monitoring, and making public their search histories is a 4th amendment violation.

Oh, I was referring to collecting phone records in a criminal investigation.

What you said seems like an obvious protection for any citizen.

 

[mudwhistle]

How many of these women were actually abused? Who is paying them for their testimony?

 

[mudwhistle]

I think DOJ monitoring, and making public their search histories is a 4th amendment violation.

 

[Blaster]

Almost everyone in Congress is on this list.

 

[mudwhistle]

You believe facebook, but not GOOGLE AI.

I wouldn't believe it if Google said the sky was blue.

They practice overt censorship.

 

[mudwhistle]

Almost everyone in Congress is on this list.

 

[Zincwarrior]

I honestly don't think they have a list of names.

Bullshit.

 

[postman]

Oh, I was referring to collecting phone records in a criminal investigation.

What you said seems like an obvious protection for any citizen.

And the phone records they obtained, are just like those routinely obtained during a criminal investigation. Like searching for Savannah Guthries mother, and seeing what cellphones were in the area at the time of the kidnapping.

Cell Tower Data Analysis: Law enforcement is reviewing cell tower data to identify "anomalous" devices that do not belong to neighbors in the vicinity at the time of the abduction, which is estimated to be around 2 a.m..

 

[Zincwarrior]

You are literally defending human traffickers. SHAME.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Congress should pass a law, like they did with the january 6th phone location searches, where congressmen could sue for $500,000 for each time they were tracked.

Original Provision: Allowed senators to claim $500,000
per violation if the DOJ obtained their phone records without notifying the senator's office, with retroactivity to 2022.

Is it illegal to track searches on your agency's database?

 

[Blaster]

You are literally defending human traffickers. SHAME.

Nonsense

 

[postman]

Is it illegal to track searches on your agency's database?

It is when there's an expectation of privacy.

The congressmen said that they didn't even log into the computers, that the FBI personnel logged in the computers for them.

Which means they didn't get the standard computer system warning

Warning! For official user only

All information on this computer system may be monitored, intercepted, recorded, read, copied or captured and disclosed by and to authorized personnel for official purposes, including criminal prosecution. You have no expectations of privacy using this system.

----------
I agree

[ OK ]

Somebody else at the FBI clicked the OK button.