Trump Sets Up Members Of Congress By Releasing Completely Unredacted Epstein Files......And They Fell Into The Trap

[CrusaderFrank]

Youre leaving out the option the officer had to step out of the way of a 5 mph car. Which he did. Why shoot her from behind twice? The kill shot was the 3rd shot. She kept driving after the first two. The last shot is what killed her. ILLEGAL.

Like Ashli Babbitt?

 

[Blaster]

If THAT is the case, and the Doj and FBI found no one to investigate in all those salacious files that they have, unredacted and unreleased then we are in big big trouble!

What trouble?

 

[Care4all]

No.....the Biden DOJ had the evidence for over 4 years......and did nothing.

You cannot blame any Trump appointees for what was done to the evidence before they got it.

The problem with you leftist supporters is you have to ignore a lot of facts of the case to arrive at the false conclusions you keep arriving at.

Would you stop with that bull crap already?

The files were with SDNY for Maxwell's investigation, charges, and prosecution and her appeals process....that was Biden's first two to three years.

And after the SDNY prosecution and conviction of Maxwell, they allegedly were investigating others, and we find out, working deals with victims and perps in civil payoffs, basically.....

And YES, the Biden admin should have released the files when investigations ended....And deals with victims and abusers shouldn't have been made for these crimes, there should have been prosecutions!!!

But so what at this point....that does not give the Trump admin a pass for doing what they are doing. You are Paedophile Protecting at this point....

 

[Care4all]

What trouble?

Something much bigger is going on, and the Doj and fbi, are in on it.

 

[Care4all]

Her use of a 4000 pound car that struck and agent does meet the imminent threat standard

• • Scott v. Harris (2007): The Court ruled that an officer’s attempt to stop a dangerous high-speed car chase, even if it puts the fleeing motorist at risk of serious injury or death, is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.
  • Plumhoff v. Rickard (2014): The Court held that firing multiple rounds to end a dangerous, high-speed chase did not violate the Fourth Amendment, noting that officers do not have to stop shooting until the threat has ended.
  • Use of Vehicle as a Weapon: A car is considered a deadly weapon if used intentionally to strike someone or cause serious bodily injury.
  • Limitation - Barnes v. Felix (2025): While generally permitted, the legality of using deadly force on a fleeing driver is highly dependent on the immediate, active threat posed to officers or the public at the moment force is used.
• These rulings emphasize that the Fourth Amendment allows deadly force to stop drivers when their actions, such as using a car as a weapon, create a severe threat to public safety.

That fails this situation. Intentionally is not met, and causing serious bodily injury is not met.

 

[Blaster]

Something much bigger is going on, and the Doj and fbi, are in on it.

You are delusional. You believe everything your Democrat masters say about this.

 

[mudwhistle]

Would you stop with that bull crap already?

The files were with SDNY for Maxwell's investigation, charges, and prosecution and her appeals process....that was Biden's first two to three years.

And after the SDNY prosecution and conviction of Maxwell, they allegedly were investigating others, and we find out, working deals with victims and perps in civil payoffs, basically.....

And YES, the Biden admin should have released the files when investigations ended....And deals with victims and abusers shouldn't have been made for these crimes, there should have been prosecutions!!!

But so what at this point....that does not give the Trump admin a pass for doing what they are doing. You are Paedophile Protecting at this point....

Jesus.....you are so stupid.

FYI, you can't indict anyone if the victims take a payoff.

The facts of life and our legal system are so foreign to you.

Rich folks offer you $5-20million to not press charges.....and you think these victims aren't going to take it?

 

[mudwhistle]

You are delusional. You believe everything your Democrat masters say about this.

Here's bonofide paid protesters discussing their pay scale in the open.

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[Blaster]

How many of these women were actually abused? Who is paying them for their testimony?

 

[Mac-7]

Goldman Sachs' top lawyer Kathy Ruemmler to resign after emails show close ties to Jeffrey Epstein

In a statement before her resignation, a Goldman Sachs spokesperson said Ruemmler "regrets ever knowing him."

www.pbs.org

She’s a typical lib

 

[postman]

Jesus.....you are so stupid.

FYI, you can't indict anyone if the victims take a payoff.

The facts of life and our legal system are so foreign to you.

Rich folks offer you $5-20million to not press charges.....and you think these victims aren't going to take it?

Google AI, says you're wrong.

Yes, a person can still be criminally charged even if they have fully discharged their civil liability (e.g., settled a lawsuit, paid damages, or signed a release). Civil and criminal proceedings are separate, independent tracks with different burdens of proof, goals, and initiating parties.

 

[mudwhistle]

Google AI, says you're wrong.

Yes, a person can still be criminally charged even if they have fully discharged their civil liability (e.g., settled a lawsuit, paid damages, or signed a release). Civil and criminal proceedings are separate, independent tracks with different burdens of proof, goals, and initiating parties.

Screw Google AI.

They can bring charges, but who is willing to go thru the shit the left will put them through for victims that took bribes to remain silent?

Yes...you can indict anyone for anything.....but you risk being laughed out of court if you have nothing on your side, including no victims.

This is more proof that some people are literally above the law.

 

[postman]

Rich folks offer you $5-20million to not press charges.....and you think these victims aren't going to take it?

The person can still be indicted, and the victim who was paid off, can be forced to testify (under subpoena) without violating any clause in the payoff.

 

[postman]

Screw Google AI.

They can bring charges, but who is willing to go thru the shit the left will put them through for victims that took bribes to remain silent?

As I said, they can be forced to testify under subpoena.

Google AI says the same thing

Yes, a victim can be forced to testify even if they do not want to press charges. Prosecutors can issue a subpoena, a legal order requiring the victim to appear in court. Ignoring a subpoena can result in penalties, including contempt of court, fines, or, in some cases, being arrested.

 

[mudwhistle]

How many of these women were actually abused? Who is paying them for their testimony?

How many of them are just paid actors?

 

[mudwhistle]

The person can still be indicted, and the victim who was paid off, can be forced to testify (under subpoena) without violating any clause in the payoff.

You're ignoring the fact that anyone who took a bribe or an out of court settlement won't convince a jury of jack squat.

 

[MisterBeale]

Good lord, this is wacky.

Trump owns them.

This is so choice.

"THE TRUMP TEAM JUST EXECUTED THE GREATEST TRAP IN POLITICAL HISTORY.

And Congress walked right into it.This week, Attorney General Pam Bondi sat before the House Judiciary Committee. Standard oversight hearing. Routine questions.Then she pulled out a document.Labeled: "Jayapal Pramila — Search History."The room went SILENT.HERE'S WHAT HAPPENEDThe DOJ gave Congress access to the unredacted Epstein files this week. Every member got their own login. Their own computer. Their own session.What Congress didn't know?The DOJ was tracking EVERY SINGLE SEARCH.Every name they looked up.Every document they opened.Every file they downloaded.ALL OF IT. LOGGED.And then brought the receipts to the hearing."

It would be nice if there was any proof of this narrative.

. . . and if there is, and this narrative is true, (which I highly doubt it is, it reeks of Qanon garbage,) the administration violated all of congresses' forth amendment rights.

 

[mudwhistle]