Trump sets a "pattern of behavior" with his pardon....

[HappyJoy]

Completely agree, I think Trump's pattern is simply to please his racist base.

Healthcare for example, they really don't care, they just don't like the black guy's plan and that's how Trump has been playing it.

Stuff like that is the reason Trump got elected. Normal people are fed up with being called racist simply for supporting common sense policies like controlling illegal immigration.

Many in his base are racist, it's why David Duke and Robert Spencer are so giddy.

Horseshit. There are probably less than 10,000 neo-Nazis in the entire country.

How many sympathizers are there? You know, people who give them the benefit of the doubt?

Probably none.

None? Who showed up in Charlottesville?

 

[2aguy]

Speaking of pattern of behavior Any of you republican idiots think of why Trump is so defensive on investigations into russia? He tweets he fires he does everything he can to stop it Ever hear the saying Methinks you protest too much??? and every move he makes shows he's unfit for office and probably will have to pardon himself

And yet even The Nation now states the democrats were not hacked by the Russians.....and going on almost a year, and no evidence of anything....at all....anywhere.....but keep trying.....you might get someone mistating something about a traffic ticket that mueller can use for a perjury offense....

 

[eddiew37]

jon in your wildest dreams you can never ever be as smart as I am You support AH's Nuff said

you are not smart edds

in fact you have outed yourself on numerous occasions

I've cut ol Eddie to pieces many times. It's not hard to do.

indeed he exposes himself rather quickly

he used to claim he was a republican --LOL

I still do make that claim Even voted for the moron gwb in 2000 But since then came to my senses You haven't. Never thought we could get worse ,,Trump proved me wrong

you can "claim" all you want

it is more then obvious you are a liar

Well you're a trumpette so you know all about lies and lying liars

 

[eddiew37]

Speaking of pattern of behavior Any of you republican idiots think of why Trump is so defensive on investigations into russia? He tweets he fires he does everything he can to stop it Ever hear the saying Methinks you protest too much??? and every move he makes shows he's unfit for office and probably will have to pardon himself

And yet even The Nation now states the democrats were not hacked by the Russians.....and going on almost a year, and no evidence of anything....at all....anywhere.....but keep trying.....you might get someone mistating something about a traffic ticket that mueller can use for a perjury offense....

Guy you must be out of what little mind you have There is NO DOUBT that Russia hacked our election Where there IS doubt is if it affected our election

 

[2aguy]

Speaking of pattern of behavior Any of you republican idiots think of why Trump is so defensive on investigations into russia? He tweets he fires he does everything he can to stop it Ever hear the saying Methinks you protest too much??? and every move he makes shows he's unfit for office and probably will have to pardon himself

And yet even The Nation now states the democrats were not hacked by the Russians.....and going on almost a year, and no evidence of anything....at all....anywhere.....but keep trying.....you might get someone mistating something about a traffic ticket that mueller can use for a perjury offense....

Guy you must be out of what little mind you have There is NO DOUBT that Russia hacked our election Where there IS doubt is if it affected our election

Moron...even the radical, left wing, The Nation can't stand the Russia collusion lie anymore...

A New Report Raises Big Questions About Last Year’s DNC Hack

Forensic investigators, intelligence analysts, system designers, program architects, and computer scientists of long experience and strongly credentialed are now producing evidence disproving the official version of key events last year. Their work is intricate and continues at a kinetic pace as we speak. But its certain results so far are two, simply stated, and freighted with implications:

• There was no hack of the Democratic National Committee’s system on July 5 last year—not by the Russians, not by anyone else. Hard science now demonstrates it was a leak—a download executed locally with a memory key or a similarly portable data-storage device. In short, it was an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system. This casts serious doubt on the initial “hack,” as alleged, that led to the very consequential publication of a large store of documents on WikiLeaks last summer.

• Forensic investigations of documents made public two weeks prior to the July 5 leak by the person or entity known as Guccifer 2.0 show that they were fraudulent: Before Guccifer posted them they were adulterated by cutting and pasting them into a blank template that had Russian as its default language. Guccifer took responsibility on June 15 for an intrusion the DNC reported on June 14 and professed to be a WikiLeaks source—claims essential to the official narrative implicating Russia in what was soon cast as an extensive hacking operation. To put the point simply, forensic science now devastates this narrative.

This article is based on an examination of the documents these forensic experts and intelligence analysts have produced, notably the key papers written over the past several weeks, as well as detailed interviews with many of those conducting investigations and now drawing conclusions from them. Before proceeding into this material, several points bear noting.

 

[bripat9643]

Stuff like that is the reason Trump got elected. Normal people are fed up with being called racist simply for supporting common sense policies like controlling illegal immigration.

Many in his base are racist, it's why David Duke and Robert Spencer are so giddy.

Many in Clinton's base are racist, like Moslems. They are all antisemitic, but turds like you don't have a problem with that so long as they vote Democrat.

Moslem? When did you get old-timey finger boi?

Clinton support (who won the popular vote) was diverse, whites, blacks, asians, hispanics, LGBTQ, Jews and yeah, Muslims, hell even Christians.

The klan, neo-nazis and alt-right humped the Trump train.

Commies, ISIS, convicted felons, child molesters, perverts, terrorists - those are Clinton's base. She even had the father of the pig who killed 50 people in Orlando standing behind her at one of her rallies.

Commies? Oh, noez.

ISIS? When did ISIS endorse anyone for president?

She 'didn't have' the father of the homophobic terrorist at her rally, they didn't know who he was.

Perverts? I'm pretty sure Trump voted for himself.

In other words, she had the father of a mass murdering Muslim terrorist at one of her rallies. The man was standing behind her, and you don't get those spots by accident.

She also firmly endorsed BLM, an organization that promotes the murder of cops. She supports ANTIFA, which uses violence to crush anyone who dares to express opposition to Hillary's agenda.

ISIS supports Democrats. Hillary was closely associated with many terrorist supporting organizations like CAIR, Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Huma Abedin’s Muslim Brotherhood Ties

That got me to wondering: Any chance Speaker Boehner might take just a couple of minutes out of his busy jihad against Bachmann to focus on how the State Department — during Ms. Abedin’s tenure — has cozied up to Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the Muslim Brotherhood’s chief sharia jurist?

Sheikh Qaradawi is a promoter of jihadist terror. His fatwas endorse terrorist attacks against American personnel in Iraq as well as suicide bombing — by both men and women — against Israel. He is a leading supporter of Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestinian branch. He also runs an umbrella organization called the Union for Good (sometimes referred to as the “Union of Good”), which is formally designated a terrorist organization under American law. The Union for Good was behind the “Peace Flotilla” that attempted to break our ally Israel’s blockade of the terrorist organization Hamas (the Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestinian branch) in 2010.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Huma Abedin’s mother, Saleha, who is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood’s female division (the “Muslim Sisterhood”), is a major figure in not one but two Union for Good components. The first is the International Islamic Council for Dawa and Relief (IICDR). It is banned in Israel for supporting Hamas under the auspices of the Union for Good. Then there’s the International Islamic Committee for Woman and Child (IICWC) — an organization that Dr. Saleha Abedin has long headed. Dr. Abedin’s IICWC describes itself as part of the IICDR. And wouldn’t you know it, the IICWC charter was written by none other than . . . Sheikh Qaradawi, in conjunction with several self-proclaimed members of the Muslim Brotherhood.

​

 

[nat4900]

How many sympathizers are there? You know, people who give them the benefit of the doubt?

Or as Trump clearly stated, "there were some 'good people' among the racist KKK, White supremacists and neo-Nazis....".......MORON !!!

 

[bripat9643]

Stuff like that is the reason Trump got elected. Normal people are fed up with being called racist simply for supporting common sense policies like controlling illegal immigration.

Many in his base are racist, it's why David Duke and Robert Spencer are so giddy.

Horseshit. There are probably less than 10,000 neo-Nazis in the entire country.

How many sympathizers are there? You know, people who give them the benefit of the doubt?

Probably none.

None? Who showed up in Charlottesville?

I don't know. Has anyone done a survey? Aside from hysterical fake news denunciations, what do we know about the people who showed up in Charlottesville?

 

[bripat9643]

How many sympathizers are there? You know, people who give them the benefit of the doubt?

Or as Trump clearly stated, "there were some 'good people' among the racist KKK, White supremacists and neo-Nazis....".......MORON !!!

That isn't what he said, douche bag.

 

[HappyJoy]

Many in his base are racist, it's why David Duke and Robert Spencer are so giddy.

Many in Clinton's base are racist, like Moslems. They are all antisemitic, but turds like you don't have a problem with that so long as they vote Democrat.

Moslem? When did you get old-timey finger boi?

Clinton support (who won the popular vote) was diverse, whites, blacks, asians, hispanics, LGBTQ, Jews and yeah, Muslims, hell even Christians.

The klan, neo-nazis and alt-right humped the Trump train.

Commies, ISIS, convicted felons, child molesters, perverts, terrorists - those are Clinton's base. She even had the father of the pig who killed 50 people in Orlando standing behind her at one of her rallies.

Commies? Oh, noez.

ISIS? When did ISIS endorse anyone for president?

She 'didn't have' the father of the homophobic terrorist at her rally, they didn't know who he was.

Perverts? I'm pretty sure Trump voted for himself.

In other words, she had the father of a mass murdering Muslim terrorist at one of her rallies. The man was standing behind her, and you don't get those spots by accident.

She also firmly endorsed BLM, an organization that promotes the murder of cops. She supports ANTIFA, which uses violence to crush anyone who dares to express opposition to Hillary's agenda.

ISIS supports Democrats. Hillary was closely associated with many terrorist supporting organizations like CAIR, Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Huma Abedin’s Muslim Brotherhood Ties

That got me to wondering: Any chance Speaker Boehner might take just a couple of minutes out of his busy jihad against Bachmann to focus on how the State Department — during Ms. Abedin’s tenure — has cozied up to Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the Muslim Brotherhood’s chief sharia jurist?

Sheikh Qaradawi is a promoter of jihadist terror. His fatwas endorse terrorist attacks against American personnel in Iraq as well as suicide bombing — by both men and women — against Israel. He is a leading supporter of Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestinian branch. He also runs an umbrella organization called the Union for Good (sometimes referred to as the “Union of Good”), which is formally designated a terrorist organization under American law. The Union for Good was behind the “Peace Flotilla” that attempted to break our ally Israel’s blockade of the terrorist organization Hamas (the Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestinian branch) in 2010.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Huma Abedin’s mother, Saleha, who is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood’s female division (the “Muslim Sisterhood”), is a major figure in not one but two Union for Good components. The first is the International Islamic Council for Dawa and Relief (IICDR). It is banned in Israel for supporting Hamas under the auspices of the Union for Good. Then there’s the International Islamic Committee for Woman and Child (IICWC) — an organization that Dr. Saleha Abedin has long headed. Dr. Abedin’s IICWC describes itself as part of the IICDR. And wouldn’t you know it, the IICWC charter was written by none other than . . . Sheikh Qaradawi, in conjunction with several self-proclaimed members of the Muslim Brotherhood.

​

Oh, Jesus, bullshit mixed with conspiracy theories. 'Boehner's jihad against Bachmann', ha, nice touch National Review, this is obviously before they became never Trumpers.

Why hasn't Trump done anything about the infiltration of the Muslim Brotherhood? Where are the Republican investigations? So, full of shit you are.

In the meantime you have posters like Tipscatlover openly wishing the confederacy won the civil war.

 

[HappyJoy]

Many in his base are racist, it's why David Duke and Robert Spencer are so giddy.

Horseshit. There are probably less than 10,000 neo-Nazis in the entire country.

How many sympathizers are there? You know, people who give them the benefit of the doubt?

Probably none.

None? Who showed up in Charlottesville?

I don't know. Has anyone done a survey? Aside from hysterical fake news denunciations, what do we know about the people who showed up in Charlottesville?

That they were kkk, neo-nazi or stood next to the kkk and neo-nazis.

 

[nat4900]

That isn't what he said, douche bag.

Trump Defends White-Nationalist Protesters: 'Some Very Fine People ...

Trump: There were 'very fine people' on both sides of Charlottesville ...

 

[HappyJoy]

How many sympathizers are there? You know, people who give them the benefit of the doubt?

Or as Trump clearly stated, "there were some 'good people' among the racist KKK, White supremacists and neo-Nazis....".......MORON !!!

Bripat is probably 'good people' too.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Millions of Democrat Voters are Racist Aztlan Nationalist who refuse to accept America is a sovereign country. The Corrupt Democrat has a racist goal to make white voters the minority ASAP and that is why that don't want our immigration laws enforced.

 

[nat4900]

Bripat is probably 'good people' too.

Yes, we should call ALL middlefingerbabies, "fine people"....

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

In law, its called a pattern of behavior or a pattern of conduct when someone establishes a recurring event that distinguishes it from an "isolated instance"....

Of course we are here talking about Trump's recent pardon of the sheriff which resembles what Trump tried to accomplish through Comey regarding Mike Flynn.

The rule of law is a foreign concept for Trump......In his business dealings, Trump was used to simply issue a mandate (remember in his businesses he never had a board to curb his actions) and folks either fell in line of were fired..............Unfortunately for Trump, government does NOT work that way.

Rest assured that Trump's recent pardon will not go unnoticed by Mueller's investigators in advising the current grand juries that this guy has established a pattern of behavior that places him above the rule of law.....or, at least, a pattern that he thinks is acceptable.....It is not.

The issue is NOT whether Trump has the authority to grant pardons;the issue is whether a president can circumvent the legal procedures just because he wants to avoid an investigation of his own misdeeds,as he tried to do by getting Flynn "off the hook."

Agree, however at this point did Trump have any other option? He only has his base at this point and they would have been constantly on his ass about it. He is beholden to Breitbart and the alt-right/racists of his party.

Trump actually has more broad support now than he did during the campaign.

Actually he doesn't.

He does as far as Republican voters are concerned he does.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Sheriff Arpaio was persecuted by racist Obama and racist Democrat judges.
Trump has a 100% right to pardon him and he is 100% correct for pardoning him.

 

[Auld Phart]

How many sympathizers are there? You know, people who give them the benefit of the doubt?

Or as Trump clearly stated, "there were some 'good people' among the racist KKK, White supremacists and neo-Nazis....".......MORON !!!

He said there were good people on BOTH sides..

I'd like to see a link stating he said 'racist KKK, White Supremacists, and neo-Nazis' tho.

 

[HappyJoy]

In law, its called a pattern of behavior or a pattern of conduct when someone establishes a recurring event that distinguishes it from an "isolated instance"....

Of course we are here talking about Trump's recent pardon of the sheriff which resembles what Trump tried to accomplish through Comey regarding Mike Flynn.

The rule of law is a foreign concept for Trump......In his business dealings, Trump was used to simply issue a mandate (remember in his businesses he never had a board to curb his actions) and folks either fell in line of were fired..............Unfortunately for Trump, government does NOT work that way.

Rest assured that Trump's recent pardon will not go unnoticed by Mueller's investigators in advising the current grand juries that this guy has established a pattern of behavior that places him above the rule of law.....or, at least, a pattern that he thinks is acceptable.....It is not.

The issue is NOT whether Trump has the authority to grant pardons;the issue is whether a president can circumvent the legal procedures just because he wants to avoid an investigation of his own misdeeds,as he tried to do by getting Flynn "off the hook."

Agree, however at this point did Trump have any other option? He only has his base at this point and they would have been constantly on his ass about it. He is beholden to Breitbart and the alt-right/racists of his party.

Trump actually has more broad support now than he did during the campaign.

Actually he doesn't.

He does as far as Republican voters are concerned he does.

More bullshit.

Trump is shedding supporters like no other president in modern history

But his own campaign pollster, Tony Fabrizio, reported numbers last week that show his base eroding. Trump’s support among Republicans and Republican-leaning independents, while still strong at 75%, has declined from earlier highs, Fabrizio said. (Even Trump can’t dismiss that one as a fake poll.)

It’s true that most of Trump’s most fervent supporters are still committed to him. But his less fervent supporters — let’s call them “soft Trump voters” — are drifting away.

 

[Avatar4321]

1) two actions does not a pattern make

2) even if it did acting lawfully isn't a pattern of wrongdoing