meaner gene
Diamond Member
- Feb 11, 2017
- 23,952
- 21,099
- 2,290
Yet they only try under democrats in the white house.Every time they try, demtwats accuse them of starving the poor and pushing grandma off a cliff.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yet they only try under democrats in the white house.Every time they try, demtwats accuse them of starving the poor and pushing grandma off a cliff.
Wrong again. There weren't any immigration laws for the United States until 1790. Well after the Constitution was written.They had immigration, they had laws to remove unwanted aliens. Clearly not everyone here was considered a citizen, nor were aliens afforded the same rights as citizens.
Really? So the colleges are going to give us back the $1.4 Trillon? WTF Ratty? even you are not that dim.The $1.4 wasn't an expenditure. It didn't require any spending. No outlays from the treasury.
It was $1.4 that was DUE to come into the Treasury, and so yes….thats a loss of $1.4.The $1.4 wasn't an expenditure. It didn't require any spending. No outlays from the treasury.
Deporting illegals takes actual payments from the treasury.
They had immigration, they had laws to remove unwanted aliens. Clearly not everyone here was considered a citizen, nor were aliens afforded the same rights as citizens.
You're falling into the rat hole of stupidity again.Really? So the colleges are going to give us back the $1.4 Trillon? WTF Ratty? even you are not that dim.
Yes. When my grandparents and great-grandparents came in legally through Ellis Island (I have their processing papers), they ended sharing tenement rooms with other poor immigrants while they slaves in sweatshops.We also did not have a welfare system back then. People coming here had to support themselves. Welfare systems and open borders are mutually exclusive.
You’re being obtuse. We, the people, were due $1.4T in loan repayments, and Biden wiped that out. We are out the money due us.You're falling into the rat hole of stupidity again.
The difference is between ripping up an IOU, and having to take money out of your wallet.
Agreed"We obviously have to make the border strong and powerful and, and we have to — at the same time, we want people to come into our country," he said. "And you know, I’m not somebody that says, 'No, you can’t come in.' We want people to come in."
As a candidate, Trump had repeatedly vowed to carry out the "largest deportation effort in American history." Asked about the cost of his plan, he said, "It’s not a question of a price tag. It’s not — really, we have no choice. When people have killed and murdered, when drug lords have destroyed countries, and now they’re going to go back to those countries because they’re not staying here. There is no price tag."
![]()
Trump says there's 'no price tag' for his mass deportation plan
In an exclusive interview with NBC News, Trump talked about his campaign promise to carry out the largest deportation of immigrants in U.S. history, regardless of cost.www.nbcnews.com
And yet there is a price tag. Not only for the economy (removing that many workers is inflationary because it will drive up the price of labor. Plus it will reduce GDP), but for the government.
How much could it cost?
Vice President-elect JD Vance has estimated Trump's actions could result in 1 million people being removed from the country each year, a pace the nonpartisan American Immigration Council estimated would cost about $88 billion annually. To deport all the people in the U.S. without authorization would take about a decade and cost nearly a trillion dollars, the council said.
![]()
Trump has promised mass deportations. Can he do it in his 2nd term as president?
Former President Donald Trump could be poised to deliver on one of his most fervent campaign promises: to deport millions of undocumented immigrants.www.usatoday.com
I guess the thrill he got from hearing the screams of immigrant children after being separated from their parents wasn't quite satisfying enough. Now he'll be breaking up families who have lived here, yes illegally, for many years. I personally know someone here in CO who is married to an illegal alien. That marriage is over if the ACLU isn't able to stop Don in the courts.
There are no direct laws in the Constitution, not sure what you are whining about. Given the fact there was a standard, having lived there for two years, those who didn't were classified as something else. Non-citizens, not afforded the full suite of rights held by citizens. You are not making a case for your point, whatever that might be.Wrong again. There weren't any immigration laws for the United States until 1790. Well after the Constitution was written.
The first major piece of U.S. legislation, the Naturalization Act, was signed in 1790, and it began the nation's first naturalization process by providing access to U.S. citizenship to free white immigrants, mostly people from western Europe, who had lived in the U.S. for at least two years and their children.
Not to mention it wasn't until 1837 that a president was a natural born citizen.
So that $1.4 Trillion never came out of the Treasury, huh? Dumb as a stump.You're falling into the rat hole of stupidity again.
The difference is between ripping up an IOU, and having to take money out of your wallet.
The $1.4 wasn't an expenditure. It didn't require any spending. No outlays from the treasury.
Deporting illegals takes actual payments from the treasury.
Wrong again. You have no concept of economics.
Whether from savings or credit, you don't pay the piper right away. And people live in the present.
You're falling into the rat hole of stupidity again.
The difference is between ripping up an IOU, and having to take money out of your wallet.
LiarActually they promised to lower them, and they did.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has finalized a rule to combat excessive credit card late fees. Starting in May 2024, the typical late fee will drop from $32 to $8.
Pay attention next time.
Actually the Constitution does have direct laws enumerated in it. Such as:There are no direct laws in the Constitution, not sure what you are whining about. Given the fact there was a standard, having lived there for two years, those who didn't were classified as something else. Non-citizens, not afforded the full suite of rights held by citizens. You are not making a case for your point, whatever that might be.
Correct, none of the $1.4 trillion came out of the treasury.So that $1.4 Trillion never came out of the Treasury, huh? Dumb as a stump.
You mean like pardons?.Should a President be allowed to hand out government assets to voting blocs
with no input from Congress?
When have republicans tried to lower the federal gov't spending when a republican was in the white house?
ANS: never.
You mean like pardons?.
They have considerable monetary value