Trump promises to sign National Reciprocity Bill

The debate is about guns, try again.

Can you be the first American to discuss guns with defaulting to clichés. Go on, you can do it.

Do you think it's common sense to not allow a woman a gun because they claim on social media they want to shoot men?
So if a woman claims that she wants to murder a man, do you think, not allowing her to use a gun, is going to stop her?

**** you are dumb ass a box of rocks.
 
So if a woman claims that she wants to murder a man, do you think, not allowing her to use a gun, is going to stop her?

**** you are dumb ass a box of rocks.
What's the easiest way to kill someone, thickhead? Look at the stats between the US, UK, Australia, New Zealand etc.. and the answer is yes.

You ******* dumb box of rocks.

Has that murderer climbed into your window yet? Did your parachute help you on the airplane? Why not wear a crash helmet when driving because last year, xxx people died of head injuries rolling their vehicle?
 
No, it must piss you off because you gun nuts always claim you DESPERATELY NEED them for self defence. And you've just proved it you don't, thicko.
I have an inviolable natural right to self defense with or without government approval. Sorry but that's just the way it is.
 
I have an inviolable natural right to self defense with or without government approval. Sorry but that's just the way it is.
Everyone does. So if someone is going to attack you by throwing some water at you, your American brain says, "Shoot them". Is that your defence strategy?

89% of attackers are known to you. So which of your friends or family do you think will attack you, and more to the point, why?
 
40% of women were killed by their immediate partner. The other 49% were known to the women.

Men that target women that they don't know is actually rare. The group that suffers most homicides are immigrants.

And here's Mikeoxenormous at his bedroom window, gun in hand, every night waiting for the elusive murderer climbing in to rape his wife.

What a ******* dumbass.

The USA, the Land of the Thick.
 
Shall not be infringed is the Only law we need.

Making more laws trying to stop the left from INFRINGING will not work when piss on the constitution already.
 
Shall not be infringed is the Only law we need.
Making more laws trying to stop the left from INFRINGING will not work when piss on the constitution already.
Too many states do not honor carry permits.

We do need a national reciprocity Law to protect our right to carry. Click on your state on the following link and you will see which states are yes (green) NO(RED) or yes with restrictions (yellow)


1731884799953.webp
 
Anyone who had a weapon in the bar could of taken him out also, but you know what? Didnt happen.

But this did happen and usually where people are the most vulnerable.


Again armed security with courage to act is invaluable in such situations. But surely you don't equate people attending a church service as being the same as a bunch of people under the influence in a bar? I don't know of any church, at least around here, that would care if somebod(ies) in the congregation were concealed carrying. But it's pretty rare that people attending a church service are under the influence of alcohol too.
 
Too many states do not honor carry permits.

We do need a national reciprocity Law to protect our right to carry. Click on your state on the following link and you will see which states are yes (green) NO(RED) or yes with restrictions (yellow)


View attachment 1043207
Looks like the election map. Wonder why? Lol
 
I don't think the GOP controlled Congress will pass it though as I think they will see it as a state's rights issue. That would leave it up to the individual whether he/she wanted to visit a state that didn't allow CC. But they could see it as a constitutional rights thing too and therefore within their jurisdiction to legislate. Either way it could wind up in the Supreme Court to decide.

We'll see how it goes.

I think CC should be a state's rights issue. I also doubt that the Senate would have 60 votes to pass that legislation, but if they did then I don't see the basis for the Supreme Court to rule against it. And finally, I think we have bigger problems than this to deal with and should not be wasting time on this issue.
 
I think CC should be a state's rights issue. I also doubt that the Senate would have 60 votes to pass that legislation, but if they did then I don't see the basis for the Supreme Court to rule against it. And finally, I think we have bigger problems than this to deal with and should not be wasting time on this issue.
It would not be a waste of time. I'm sure many democrats would approve as well as Republicans.
 
I think CC should be a state's rights issue. I also doubt that the Senate would have 60 votes to pass that legislation, but if they did then I don't see the basis for the Supreme Court to rule against it. And finally, I think we have bigger problems than this to deal with and should not be wasting time on this issue.
I doubt seriously that will will spend any time on this issue unless the Democrats force them to. In which case I can't see the GOP weakening the intent of the 2nd Amendment in any way. But I don't recall concealed carry being brought up in any campaign content by either side so I suspect it won't be brought up any time soon if at all.
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom