deflection from my post, and somehow...made it okay for iraq to do it.It was really sad that we had to rely on our allies intel for information because our president had impeded our own intel.No, but it is a soldier's job to neutralize the enemy, especially if you know he is a threat to you. And the facts have born that out, so stop right now with your attempts at strawman arguments. al Quada were the ones to declare war to the death against us. This guy was fighting for the people who killed 3000 Americans and brought down the WTC.
The FACTS have already established that the murdered Iraqi was none of the things that you so disparity want to be true. That is why behenna was convicted and then pardoned by a grifter.
BTW Iraq had nothing to do with 911. However Saudi Arabia did and we just them do as they please. Even murder in cold blood.
Saddam Hussein was giving aid and comfort to al Quada and Bin Laden was simply born in Saudi Arabia and not well regarded there. But they DID celebrate Barack Hussein Obama's election as "one of their boys." Like you.
Iraq had no ties to al Qaeda or bin laden. So, the question is can you provide the links from your deeply held wignuttery.
Saying we didn't need it. Iraq did not have clean hands in this. They did gas their own, remember? They did thwart the UN
from monitoring.
Saddam gassed his people with US made weapons, purchased on Reagan's watch.
Reagan helped Iraq gas Iranians too; what's the difference.
Is it the job of the US to support the gassing of any people?
Your hard earned tax dollars at work going toward killing for shitz & gigglez.
Oh yippy .......