Trump Officially Throws Pro-Lifers Under the Bus

[john doe 101]

Pretty sure abortion is a woman’s decision. Not a “doctors”.

It can be a medical decision. So yeah, a doctor would be involved in that. Well maybe not for your kind you get your medical advice from randoms on twitter.

 

[el midgetron]

You're the one that started the whole gay talk.

You are the one who cried about personal attacks after attacking me personally.

 

[john doe 101]

You are the one who cried about personal attacks after attacking me personally.

No I wasnt. You've got us mixed up, dummy. Take another swig from the bottle.

 

[el midgetron]

It can be a medical decision. So yeah, a doctor would be involved in that. Well maybe not for your kind you get your medical advice from randoms on twitter.

“Can be a medical decision” as opposed to being a psycho baby killer decision?

Do you not support abortion outside of a medical decision?

 

[cnm]

What a simp you are. The very definition of a useful idiot, regurgitating uncited bullshit.

 

[el midgetron]

No I wasnt. You've got us mixed up, dummy. Take another swig from the bottle.

Duly noted you didnt address waking up and deciding to be gay today. We'll just assume that is the case.

 

[john doe 101]

“Can be a medical decision” as opposed to being a psycho baby killer decision?

Do you not support abortion outside of a medical decision?

Murder is still illegal, dipshit.

 

[initforme]

Now that roe is gone and back to the states voters, the pro life side should be thrilled, but many are not. What more do they want? What's wrong with the voters deciding?

 

[initforme]

Dual income no kids...wave of the future.

 

[john doe 101]

Now that roe is gone and back to the states voters, the pro life side should be thrilled, but many are not. What more do they want? What's wrong with the voters deciding?

Because everyone doesnt think like they do?

 

[el midgetron]

He was talking about states rights.

 

[el midgetron]

Murder is still illegal, dipshit.

Unless the victim is on the wrong side of a cervix.

 

[initforme]

The more this issue us debated the more people are pushed away from having kids.

 

[john doe 101]

Unless the victim is on the wrong side of a cervix.

Name one time an abortion occurred right before birth that wasnt due to some type of medical emergency that wasnt prosecuted. We'll be waiting on your answer.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Decisions About Developmental Anomalies Should Not Be Set Through Public Policy "

* Not Hysterically Concerned With Non Issues *

So you oppose late term abortion, yes?

First , the medical community does not facilitate without cause abortion in late second and in third trimesters and women simply do not seek them .

One cannot simply refer to third trimester abortion without making a distinction between with and without cause abortion , even though the distinction has not been made definitively clear , except that with cause would be related to developmental anomalies .

It remains the opinion of this moniker that a decision as to which developmental anomalies would justify with cause abortion should remain with the individual , through informed consent from medical providers , and that the decisions not be set through public policy by politicians .

The roe v wade decision ruled that states could outlaw abortion in third trimester , which is reasonable when it applies to without cause abortion , however it is not reasonable to disregard developmental anomalies that would justify with cause abortion .

 

[cnm]

Name one time an abortion occurred right before birth that wasnt due to some type of medical emergency that wasnt prosecuted. We'll be waiting on your answer.

Waiting a fair while would be my guess...

 

[cnm]

Pretty sure abortion is a woman’s decision. Not a “doctors”.

Well, you seem to be misinformed about everything else so why not that as well?

 

[el midgetron]

Name one time an abortion occurred right before birth that wasnt due to some type of medical emergency that wasnt prosecuted. We'll be waiting on your answer.

If it doesn’t happen, like you claim, then you should have no problem with it being prohibited.

 

[john doe 101]

If it doesn’t happen, like you claim, then you should have no problem with it being prohibited.

You're right I have no problem with that being prohibited under those circumstances. Because it doesnt happen.

 

[el midgetron]

" Decisions About Developmental Anomalies Should Not Be Set Through Public Policy "

* Not Hysterically Concerned With Non Issues *

First , the medical community does not facilitate without cause abortion in late second and in third trimesters and women simply do not seek them .

One cannot simply refer to third trimester abortion without making a distinction between with and without cause abortion , even though the distinction has not been made definitively clear , except that with cause would be related to developmental anomalies .

It remains the opinion of this moniker that a decision as to which developmental anomalies would justify with cause abortion should remain with the individual , through informed consent from medical providers , and that the decisions not be set through public policy by politicians .

The roe v wade decision ruled that states could outlaw abortion in third trimester , which is reasonable when it applies to without cause abortion , however it is not reasonable to disregard developmental anomalies that would justify with cause abortion .

Ok, so without an actual medical “cause”, do you support banning late term abortion?