Trump Officially Throws Pro-Lifers Under the Bus

" Citing The Extremes Of Ignorance To Implement The Same "

* Poster Children For Dumb Ideas *


It is not difficult to identify public ignorance of fools trying to express themselves in ways to ensure their constitutional protections as us citizens .

For nearly 50 years , the informed consent of the public for the actual constitutional basis for abortion has been deprived to the us public .

As usual , the freak farmer fanatics ignore their own stupidity of demands for others to deliver offspring that are not even progeny , in that the offspring would be able to produce progeny of its own .
There is no Constitutional right to abortion. If anything, the Constitution recognizes the “right to life” of all people, regardless of their birthing status.

“The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments state that no person can be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.”
 
He's getting more and more desperate as his chances recede.
I don’t think he’s that calculated.

Trump’s real problem is that unlike with Rubio, Perry, Carly Fiorina, Biden, etc... he can’t call Harris the names he really wants to call her. His hard core base would love it of course if he started squeezing off the n-word and the c-word (or even the b-word) at his rallies.

But he’d lose anyone who isn’t swimming in the kool-aid already.
 
So if a state votes to allow late-term abortions, Republicans are going to be perfectly fine with that now, right?

“We think it should be up to the states. We have no problem with you killing babies if that’s what your state decided. Go ahead and murder those babies. Murder all the babies you want.”

That’s going to be your response? Yea, I’m not buying that.
 
" A Pee Pole Is A Patriarchal Reference To A Phallus "

* Do Not Pass Go *

There is no Constitutional right to abortion. If anything, the Constitution recognizes the “right to life” of all people, regardless of their birthing status.
“The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments state that no person can be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.”
The etymology of the term person is per and son , which implies countable by census and male , such that by etymology from us 14th amendment , daughters being female are not sons and technically not citizens of us republic ; and , if you do believe that see us 19th amendment .

By declaration of independence , that all men are created equal surreptitiously implies that woe of men are not equal ; however , us republic is founded upon independence of the individual and the term individual should replace the term person in articles of law .

A state is comprised of citizens for whom interests of a state exist , and the only non incidental requirement to become a us citizen is live birth and consequently , by equitable doctrine , a live birth is required for equal protection with a citizen .

On the issue of abortion , a legitimate state interest is not " when does life begin ? " , rather a legitimate state interest is " when does a state interest begin ? " .

In addition to dumbfounded sedition against us 14th , 9th , 1st and 10th amendments , the dobbs decision includes malfeasance against title 1 section 8 of us code that defines a per son as any homo sapien sapien born alive at any point of development ; scotus should be charged with the crimes just as any despot that suspends us constitution .
 
Last edited:
" Patriarchal Terms From Antiquity "

* It Pops Out *

A “pee pole”……
Etymology (/ˌɛtɪˈmɒlədʒi/, ET-im-OL-ə-jee[1]) is the scientific study of the origin and evolution of a word's semantic meaning across time, including its constituent morphemes and phonemes.[2][3] It is a subfield of historical linguistics, philology, and semiotics, and draws upon comparative semantics, morphology, pragmatics, and phonetics in order to construct a comprehensive and chronological catalogue of all meanings that a morpheme, phoneme, word, or sign has carried across time.
 
The longer this campaign goes on, the more to the left Trump moves. A large part of Trump's base is pro-life. In fact, there are a lot of people who vote solely on that issue. How are they going to react to this? The bargain evangelicals made with Trump in 2016 was over in 2020. They could have picked someone better. We had a primary with competent candidates and everything. Well done, folks.

Tell us again how the people who challenged Trump in the primaries were the RINOs.


His free speech opinion throws prolifers under the bus?

Well, I don't feel any gravel of being under a bus,and my opinion that abortion is murder is still what I think is true.
 
Yet again, the left claim another falsehood about Trump.
Running in 2015 - he said "I will veto any attempt to ban abortion"
Trump has been consistent. He stated all along it should be a state issue, nit federally mandated.
And he did just that.
I feel no gravel for being under the bus, but the real issue about whether abortion is murder or not should be decided by the judiciary, not Congress, and not the Executive Branch. A fetus is in the early stages of growth of a human being. A human being has the right to life, IMHO. Not everyone believes a fetus is a human being, and in my book, that is wrong to kill a human being, young or old, little or big, before or after birth. A baby who is born unwanted would be a treasure to couples who want to have a child, but nature wouldn't help them conceive. And that's only my opinion.

Ideally, most Americans love their baby after it is born. But some hate children in general, and what would it hurt if they stay out their 9 months and made a childless couple happy by giving up their baby to a couple dedicated to a child's life and happiness.

From the youngest voter to the POTUS, opinions do not offend me, as the 360-degree continuum in a country of free speech is a Constitutional protected freedom. Killing a human being is not a protected freedom because it allows a killing of an American human being. That's why I believe this matter should be decided by the Courts of Law, and the President can speak freely whether I agree or disagree with what is said.

The English seem to have lost their freedom of speech. It's not so easy here to force people to not say this or that. and that is precisely why the founding fathers demanded the freedom to say what they think, and we have the right to criticize the government. God bless our Constitution. Look at the country it produced. We must never remove a man's right to say what he thinks is right.
 


Apparently Trump posted this (38 second in) on Truth Social (which I can't use to verify) that he will be good for women's reproductive rights.

So, from MAGA's point of view either he's lying, or he's putting up a policy which I think from the point of view of MAGA is the opposite of what they want.

So how does MAGA feel about this?
 
Good.

Women’s reproductive rights should begin with empowerment. Needing a treatment is a dependency, not an empowerment. Science knows how women get pregnant. Most abortions are due to circumstances within the control of the woman.
 
Good.

Women’s reproductive rights should begin with empowerment. Needing a treatment is a dependency, not an empowerment. Science knows how women get pregnant. Most abortions are due to circumstances within the control of the woman.
Needing a "treatment" is dependency? You're an absolute lunatic.
 
Good.

Women’s reproductive rights should begin with empowerment. Needing a treatment is a dependency, not an empowerment. Science knows how women get pregnant. Most abortions are due to circumstances within the control of the woman.

You're suggesting self-abortion are you?
 


Apparently Trump posted this (38 second in) on Truth Social (which I can't use to verify) that he will be good for women's reproductive rights.

So, from MAGA's point of view either he's lying, or he's putting up a policy which I think from the point of view of MAGA is the opposite of what they want.

So how does MAGA feel about this?

Trump is imploding. LOL thinking he's going to gain women voters like this. He's an absolute idiot.
 
Needing a "treatment" is dependency? You're an absolute lunatic.
Sorry to invade your faggy safe-space but yes, needing treatment is a dependency. If not, shut up and take care of your families medical needs yourself.
 
Trump supported the return of that decision to the States level. That's all. He's even said he'd VETO any Federal attempt to have a national law outlawing abortion. I think the vast majority of abortions are a disgusting form of retroactive birth control and those who use it as such are casually evil.

That said, I believe they have that choice and if they live in a state where enough of their neighbors agree with them, then so be it. Each individual choice will be judged in God's own timing. He is the judge, not me. Let the states decide.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom