Trump loses Carroll case appeal

[White 6]

Leftists tend to support what the Dems and their MSM wing tell them to support. Your post is no surprise.

Complain to a Dem about it. I am not responsible for them.

 

[White 6]

You support jury verdicts which result in any attack against conservatism.

But if you were politically persecuted and suffered an unjustified conviction, you would not favor the jury verdict. You’d be damn happy to have an appellate process.

So, no. You don’t “support juries.”

No, I don't. Oh, and there is nothing remotely conservative about Trump.

 

[MarathonMike]

Trump fails to overturn $5m damages award to E Jean Carroll for defamation

US appeals court denies challenge after 2023 civil jury trial found Trump sexually abused Carroll then defamed her

www.theguardian.com

When is this felon going to pay up ? This lady has waited long enough for her compeensation.
He is claiming the Supreme Court gave him immunity. Obviously for crimes he comitted before he was elected. It doesnt sound like he has anything else. Pathetic.

It's sad that Trump hate is so important to you.

 

[BackAgain]

Ah, good ol' TDS. The charge to fling, when you've got nothing.

But, of course, he does in this case.

When a DA in NY obtains an indictment, the legal proceedings which ensue have a provision requiring the judge to review the Grand Jury minutes and the DA’s legal instructions to that Grand Jury. The motion is usually part of an Omnibus motion. That branch of the motion (to inspect the grand jury minutes and to dismiss the indictment) is supposed to be taken seriously by judges.

In this case, it wasn’t.

The jury “selected” in that case came from a deep blue city jury pool. NYC is awash in TDS.

Oh, by the way. You know it. So did the Biden Administration and Bragg’s staff. And they relied on it.

 

[White 6]

I support juries, I dont support the system of proof needed to achieve a multi million dollar judgment being so low that you dont even have to believe he DID commit the crime, only that its possible he COULD have.

Again, she had no proof, no credible witnesses, she patterned the story after one of her favorite TV shows, and she sat on it for 30 years. And when trump tries to deny the allegation, she sued him for defamation. Where in our justice system is it right that you can be sued for proclaiming your innocence?

The point is, what she did was prove that you dont need any evidence to sue someone, all you need is a sympathetic jury.

Let me know when you publish or testify on tort reform, but for now, you get to deal with law, the way it exists. People sue people in the US, all the time. I have never sued or been sued. Some awards by juries do raise an eyebrow with me also, but at least in this case, I know he brought this judgement on his own head, running his mouth publicly attacking the plaintiff, after he lost the original case, so I have no reason to feel sorry for him.

 

[White 6]

But, of course, he does in this case.

When a DA in NY obtains an indictment, the legal proceedings which ensue have a provision requiring the judge to review the Grand Jury minutes and the DA’s legal instructions to that Grand Jury. The motion is usually part of an Omnibus motion. That branch of the motion (to inspect the grand jury minutes and to dismiss the indictment) is supposed to be taken seriously by judges.

In this case, it wasn’t.

The jury “selected” in that case came from a deep blue city jury pool. NYC is awash in TDS.

Oh, by the way. You know it. So did the Biden Administration and Bragg’s staff. And they relied on it.

The jury was the jury, selected by both sides. I have greater faith in juries than you, so you guys continue to whine. Buck up, dude. Little Donny will be fine. $5 Million isn't dick to him, but I bet he won't come out the courtroom and make more disparaging attacks on her, again. I think they were sending a message and may have gotten it, this time.

 

[Blaster]

The jury was the jury, selected by both sides. I have greater faith in juries than you, so you guys continue to whine. Buck up, dude. Little Donny will be fine. $5 Million isn't dick to him, but I bet he won't come out the courtroom and make more disparaging attacks on her, again. I think they were sending a message and may have gotten it, this time.

I have no faith in juries.

 

[White 6]

I have no faith in juries.

Did you personally lose or just come to that opinion, based on personal observation or other people's outcomes?

 

[Blaster]

Did you personally lose or just come to that opinion, based on personal observation or other people's outcomes?

I served on two juries and many folks on those juries were not impartial. It was an eye opening experience.

 

[BackAgain]

The jury was the jury, selected by both sides.

That is only nominally true. But that suffices when you’re spewing silly platitudes.

I have greater faith in juries than you,

No actually. You don’t. I worked in the system and I am a fan of the system. You only approve of juries when it suits you.

so you guys continue to whine.

I’m not whining and we’re all entitled to criticize things when we perceive a miscarriage of justice like that case.

Buck up, dude.

No reason for you to fret about that.

Little Donny will be fine.

President Trump may very well be fine. That doesn’t mean he has received justice. He hasn’t.

$5 Million isn't dick to him,

Maybe. Not the point, though.

but I bet he won't come out the courtroom and make more disparaging attacks on her, again.

I don’t care if he does or doesn’t.

I think they were sending a message and may have gotten it, this time.

I believe you and your ilk have sent a poisonous message and we are all seeing it in real time. Disgraceful.

 

[meaner gene]

What is fair is a jury of impartial peers. The judge should have granted the change in venue.

Regardless of the fact that had this been any other person than Trump, this trial would never have happened.

It was a political prosecution for political purposes.

Like the trial of Harvey Weinstein?

Purely political?

 

[meaner gene]

You support jury verdicts which result in any attack against conservatism.

But if you were politically persecuted and suffered an unjustified conviction, you would not favor the jury verdict. You’d be damn happy to have an appellate process.

So, no. You don’t “support juries.”

If you don't like jury verdicts from the peers in the district where the crime was committed, you'll need to amend the constitution.

 

[meaner gene]

The jury “selected” in that case came from a deep blue city jury pool. NYC is awash in TDS.

To kill a mockingbird?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Ah, good ol' TDS. The charge to fling, when you've got nothing.

You definitely suffer from TDS. Stupidity at that level does not occur naturally. You will probably blame Trump for Israel's attack on Iran and the Minnesota shootings.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

It is highly unlikely you will ever see a jury pool composed of 100% extremists. I have been in jury pools, as well as on juries. I didn't see any nutballs, randomly called by the computer, to be in a jury pool. I have observed questioning and selection/rejection process by both sides. Perhaps, you have not.

The juries in New York are always extremists because they are made up by people too stupid to get out of jury duty.

 

[meaner gene]

New York City Appeals Court? Like that wasn't expected.
On to the United States Supreme Court.

There is no federal question here.

AI Overview
The U.S. Supreme Court is not primarily a court of error correction. Its main role is to decide important questions of federal law, not to correct mistakes made by lower courts. While the Court may review cases where lower courts have conflicting interpretations of federal law or where a lower court's decision is clearly in error, its focus is on establishing legal precedent and ensuring uniformity in the application of federal law.

 

[meaner gene]

I served on two juries and many folks on those juries were not impartial. It was an eye opening experience.

Didn't the lawyers question the potential jurors?

 

[meaner gene]

You definitely suffer from TDS. Stupidity at that level does not occur naturally. You will probably blame Trump for Israel's attack on Iran and the Minnesota shootings.

Before the effectiveness of the strike, Trump said he had n knowledge of it.
After it's success was confirmed, Trump bragged of his involvement.

 

[rightwinger]

The jury “selected” in that case came from a deep blue city jury pool. NYC is awash in TDS.

Trump chose to sexually assault a woman in deep blue NYC
Trumps lawyers got a choice in selecting jurors

Is our Justice system great or what?

 

[j-mac]

You sense of what is proper is either deficient or defunct.

Yeah? Who the fuck are you? Nobody…So, blow it out your ass dipshit