Trump loses Carroll case appeal

[BULLDOG]

Lol, one doesnt have to be IN the court room to see that justice had broken down. Again, if she could have shown any proof, id be fine with her winning...though id still disagree on the amount. She waited 30 years to come forward.

The fact is, she had no proof. A tape of locker room talk and a unverifiable claim that she told a couple friends.

Thats not proof that trump assaulted her.

Seems the judge disagreed with you. You really should have been there to correct their mistakes.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Seems the judge disagreed with you. You really should have been there to correct their mistakes.

Sooooo you're saying the courts dont get things wrong? Hmm?

 

[BULLDOG]

Sooooo you're saying the courts dont get things wrong? Hmm?

Sure they do. That's what appeals courts are for. Not surprising that MAGA thinks every ruling that goes against trump is wrong. Do you think he is incapable of committing all the crimes he has been found guilty of?

 

[ThisIsMe]

Sure they do. That's what appeals courts are for. Not surprising that MAGA thinks every ruling that goes against trump is wrong. Do you think he is incapable of committing all the crimes he has been found guilty of?

And see thats where you are wrong, I've stated many times that I dont agree with trump on various things, THIS one, however, IS wrong, because she came with a 30 year old allegation of which she had zero proof that he ever even met her in a bergdorf store.

Do you think he is incapable of committing all the crimes he has been found guilty of

hes capable of committing any crime, as is any other person. Now, the quesrion is, of the weekly allegations that seem to be brought against him, how many are partisan BS and how many are valid?

The quesrion is, are you incapable of thinking hes innocent of any of these charges?

 

[rightwinger]

Carrol wrote a book about the trial which was recently published which will drive sub~human Dopetard to hysterics.

Let's see how long it takes him to run his big mouth again.

Trumps buttons are easy to push
He is how own worst enemy

 

[BULLDOG]

And see thats where you are wrong, I've stated many times that I dont agree with trump on various things, THIS one, however, IS wrong, because she came with a 30 year old allegation of which she had zero proof that he ever even met her in a bergdorf store.



hes capable of committing any crime, as is any other person. Now, the quesrion is, of the weekly allegations that seem to be brought against him, how many are partisan BS and how many are valid?

The quesrion is, are you incapable of thinking hes innocent of any of these charges?

There is a long list that the courts have found him guilty of, and an even longer list he has openly admitted.

 

[Clipper]

Trumps buttons are easy to push
He is how own worst enemy

He's an incompetent assclown.

 

[ThisIsMe]

There is a long list that the courts have found him guilty of, and an even longer list he has openly admitted.

Im talking of THIS instance. In this instance, the has no proof, yet our "justice system" awarded her 83M.....for not having proof, lying about it, not remembering details from the incident.

 

[BULLDOG]

Im talking of THIS instance. In this instance, the has no proof, yet our "justice system" awarded her 83M.....for not having proof, lying about it, not remembering details from the incident.

Again, you should have been in court to keep them straight. His guilty verdict is all your fault.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Again, you should have been in court to keep them straight. His guilty verdict is all your fault.

Again, my not being there has nothing to do with the jury decision. It doesn't take me being being there to see it was wrong.

 

[BULLDOG]

Again, my not being there has nothing to do with the jury decision. It doesn't take me being being there to see it was wrong.

without you there, they didn't rule to suit you. I'm just sayin.

 

[ThisIsMe]

without you there, they didn't rule to suit you. I'm just sayin.

Ive never suggested they should rule to suit me. Anyone who's remotely honest would see that verdict was crap. Again..she had....no...proof! She lied, changed her story, couldn't remember details, and got the idea from an episode of her favorite TV show. What else does it take for you to see that verdict was crap

 

[BULLDOG]

Ive never suggested they should rule to suit me. Anyone who's remotely honest would see that verdict was crap. Again..she had....no...proof! She lied, changed her story, couldn't remember details, and got the idea from an episode of her favorite TV show. What else does it take for you to see that verdict was crap

well, if they gave another verdict, I might be able to agree with you. As it is, your cult leader lost. Quit whining you big baby.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Ive never suggested they should rule to suit me. Anyone who's remotely honest would see that verdict was crap. Again..she had....no...proof! She lied, changed her story, couldn't remember details, and got the idea from an episode of her favorite TV show. What else does it take for you to see that verdict was crap

She told confidants 10 years before the SUV episode.

That was testified to in court.

WW

 

[rightwinger]

Ive never suggested they should rule to suit me. Anyone who's remotely honest would see that verdict was crap. Again..she had....no...proof! She lied, changed her story, couldn't remember details, and got the idea from an episode of her favorite TV show. What else does it take for you to see that verdict was crap

Two juries said they believed Carrolls description of the event over Trumps denials

 

[ThisIsMe]

well, if they gave another verdict, I might be able to agree with you. As it is, your cult leader lost. Quit whining you big baby.

Lol, what you see as "whining" is simply a disagreement in what is plainly before my eyes. Its obvious you are ok to overlook the errors because...its in your favor.


By the way, why did you overlook the biden/daughter showers, and biden assaulting Tara reade? Oh thats right..because you simply want to overlook that because it is "your guy".

See, the difference is, if carroll had proof against trump, id be supportive of any punishment, but she didn't. I wonder if any on the left would take that stance about biden.....

 

[BULLDOG]

Lol, what you see as "whining" is simply a disagreement in what is plainly before my eyes. Its obvious you are ok to overlook the errors because...its in your favor.


By the way, why did you overlook the biden/daughter showers, and biden assaulting Tara reade? Oh thats right..because you simply want to overlook that because it is "your guy".

See, the difference is, if carroll had proof against trump, id be supportive of any punishment, but she didn't. I wonder if any on the left would take that stance about biden.....

You are certainly free to believe all of that no matter how wrong and goofy it is. Like Dan Quale once said, "What a waste it is to lose one's mind"

 

[OODA_Loop]

Yet two juries found her more credible than Donald J Trump

From her testimony arising from an event alleged to have happened 30 years ago.

 

[ThisIsMe]

She told confidants 10 years before the SUV episode.

That was testified to in court.

WW

Suure she did. And the only proof of thaf is her, thr accusers, and her friends. Friends by the way who were so concerned that not a single person went to the police, nor to the hospital, nor told anyone else. And were just finding all this out 30 years later.


Look at these lines and tell me you don't think it sounds suspicious:

From: E. Jean Carroll wasn't surprised 'Law & Order: SVU' aired Bergdorf Goodman rape scene 7 years before she made Trump allegations

**In 2012 — seven years before E. Jean Carroll publicly accused Donald Trump of raping her — "Law & Order: SVU" aired an episode featuring a rape in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room, while a victim was trying on lingerie.

Carroll's allegations against Trump, first published in a book excerpt in New York magazine in 2019, sounded remarkably similar.


She claimed that, in the mid-1990s, Trump raped her in the dressing room of Bergdorf Goodman's lingerie section.**

So...allegedly 13 years prior she had been assaulted...in bergdorf dressing room, trying on lingere, she "claimed" to tell someone but nobody came forward and there wasnt any proof that it ever happened. No cameras no screaming...

13 years later Law and Order, her favorite TV show, airs and episode of a woman getting raped in a dressing room of bergdorf goodman...


Then...7 years after that, she writes an article depicting exactly what the law and order story depicted. She wasnt really looking to come forward...until trump was president....THEN suddenly she finds the need to come out with it.

Really? That doesn't look even a little suspect to you?

A brief moment of the episode — titled “Theatre and Tricks” — involves a character talking about role-playing a rape fantasy in Bergdorf Goodman

And then on Anderson Cooper she says "some people think rape is sexy"

Then:

Trump's defense grills E. Jean Carroll about old social media posts in rape allegation trial

In Carroll's last day of scheduled testimony, Trump lawyer Joe Tacopina asked her about old Facebook posts in which she praised Donald Trump's reality show "The Apprentice."

www.nbcnews.com

She was also asked about a 2012 post in which she asked people whether they would have sex with Trump for $17,000 and could keep their eyes closed during it.

Yes," she said when she was asked whether she'd written the post. "I made several jokes about Donald Trump."

So in January of 2012, law and order airs the episode of law and order that depicts her story to a T, the later that year she writes a post on social media asking if people would have sex with trump for money and keep their eyes shut, then 7 heard later she writes about that same scenario in her book.

None of that is even remotely suspicious?

Again...proof...if she had proof, id be supportive of her, but her story is simply too strange.

 

[rightwinger]

From her testimony arising from an event alleged to have happened 30 years ago.

Yes, she was recalling an event from 30 years ago

Meanwhile, Trump

Bragged about grabbing women by the pussies
30 women claimed he did the same to them
Claimed he didn’t know who she was and was presented with a picture of the two of them laughing together
Claimed she was “not his type” but misidentified the woman in the picture as his wife Marla Maples


Who did two juries believe?