Trump Is Going To Lose Most Of The Current Federal Court Cases....Then What?

Biden won in 2020. What are you talking about. And then the Democratic Party imploded. LOL

So how many more lies will you tell?
You'll say it now...bet you weren't saying that before Trump won last year.

Regardless...it shows very poor judgement on your part that you still support Trump after Jan 6. Shameful.
 
You'll say it now...bet you weren't saying that before Trump won last year.

Regardless...it shows very poor judgement on your part that you still support Trump after Jan 6. Shameful.
Untrue. How many more lies will you tell? Lmao.

I broke another defect. Too easy. On to the next one.

Jan 6th happened for a reason. You’re too stupid to understand what it was.
 
Untrue. How many more lies will you tell? Lmao.

I broke another defect. Too easy. On to the next one.
You can't "break" anyone when you are too immoral and fucked-up to not vote for someone who tried to steal the 2020 election.

You have to own your immoral vote.

Jan 6th happened for a reason. You’re too stupid to understand what it was.
Yeah, it happened for a reason -- Trump is a corrupt, evil asshole and a fascist....but you keep licking his balls.
 
You can't "break" anyone when you are too immoral and fucked-up to not vote for someone who tried to steal the 2020 election.

You have to own your immoral vote.


Yeah, it happened for a reason -- Trump is a corrupt, evil asshole and a fascist....but you keep licking his balls.
You lied countless times. Are you going to admit that or just keep moving the goal posts, Dr. Defect? You’re not on my level. That’s obvious.

You queer for Palestine wimp.
 
You lied countless times. Are you going to admit that or just keep moving the goal posts, Dr. Defect? You’re not on my level. That’s obvious.

You queer for Palestine wimp.
Here's the thing...it doesn't matter who is "smarter".

You're immoral...and you proved it by voting for Trump and defending his insanity every single fucking day.

Talking to you is like having a debate with Hitler about government ethics....it's pointless.
 
Here's the thing...it doesn't matter who is "smarter".

You're immoral...and you proved it by voting for Trump and defending his insanity every single fucking day.

Talking to you is like having a debate with Hitler about government ethics....it's pointless.
Morality is subjective.

There is the Hitler card. Man you’re predictable, Dr. Defect. My ancestors defeated Hitler btw.


Oh oh
 
Morality is subjective.

There is the Hitler card. Man you’re predictable, Dr. Defect. My ancestors defeated Hitler btw.
And now you vote for someone who doesn't believe in democracy -- Trump.

The irony.

And you are also shamelessly dishonest...I ripped you a new asshole about how Trump is destroying the EPA, and you just talked stupid MAGA bumpkin shit the whole time. Just pathetic.
 
And now you vote for someone who doesn't believe in democracy -- Trump.

The irony.

And you are also shamelessly dishonest...I ripped you a new asshole about how Trump is destroying the EPA, and you just talked stupid MAGA bumpkin shit the whole time. Just pathetic.
Really?

Pretty sure your party tossed out an elected candidate and threw in a sub who didn’t earn one vote. They along with their legacy media allies covered up his lack of mental acuity and protected VP Harris.

Talk about a threat to Democracy. LOL

Dr. Defect, you have yet to address why you so blatantly lied about what I said in this thread? Man up. Bitch
 
I’m well you take the said of the “interpretation” and I’ll take the side of the literal meaning. Can’t wait to use your argument against you in the future
You don’t even see that you’re babbling.

Listen, dopey. (It won’t help because you seem incapable of having an open mind or of learning anything; but I can still try.)

Would you argue that every single word in the Constitution is crystal clear and perfectly unambiguous? Would you deny MY contention which is that there are some ambiguities in the Constitution?

If you manage to agree with me that ambiguities do exist in the Constitution, well then, in order to comply with it, some ambiguities need to be addressed. For example:

1st Amendment: “Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press ….” Are you so literal that you believe a law prohibiting the publication of top secret information is somehow unconstitutional? So, maybe “no” law was never intended to include particular “speech”? A wee bit of common sense tells us that, of course, it’s not “unconstitutional” to prohibit the publication of classified documents.

What I just posted ^ in this post is simply the truth and it’s accurate. If you agree, then you seem obliged to concede that the Constitution sometimes requires legal analysis.
 
I know your weak argument rests on a congressman redefining a word to mean something it doesn’t mean. Game over
Wrong. The congressman was debating the option of which language would or should be used for the 14th Amendment. Actual Congressional debate was taking place before the 14th Amendment passed Congress. So, what they initially said about the meaning of the Amendment informs the Court about how it is to be interpreted.

Your ignorant reliance on literalism is laughable, as is your displayed ignorance about the Congressional debate occurring in Congress before the Amendment was passed.

Games over.
 
You still can’t declare yourself a winner. That’s ridiculous. I smoke you nonstop but only an unbiased 3rd party can corroborate this
I can declare whatever I want and you can disagree. Free country
 
1. Trump didn't incite anything on 1/6, just ask the FBI, they investigated and said no incitement, so stop lying about it.

2. Anyone who voted for Kamala instead of Trump proved they have a very low-IQ

FBI finds no evidence that Trump and his allies were directly involved with organizing the violence of the Capitol riot: report​

  • The FBI has found no evidence that Trump was directly involved in organizing Capitol-riot violence.
  • It also found little evidence of an organized plot to overturn the election results.
  • "Ninety to ninety-five percent of these are one-off cases," said one former official.

So you need to find a better anti-Trump rationale'
 
Back
Top Bottom