Says who? You? You are you to pass judgement on them and based on what? YOur hate?
This whining that someone hates "Christians" or is "anti-Christian" is BS. Putting aside for a moment people of non-Christian faiths and people who do not adhere to a faith, Christians are feuding among themselves. Just using the term "Christian" means that one can't tell the players without a score card. Just this morning, someone commented that Catholics and Protestants had to be considered separately on some issue, but not only did he fail to break down the various Protestant denominations, he didn't mention the Orthodox at all.
Nothing in your post, supports your claim, that you made in your first sentence.
That Christians are a diverse group, does not mean that someone could still not hate them, or even some of them, with certain exceptions for self serving reasons.
My point stands. RW and libs like him, are anti-Christian bigots. Yes, Christians are a diverse group and libs like RW, do have exceptions of some Christians they like, primarily Christians that support the lib agenda.
But that still hate quite a lot of Christians, and argue against their right to participate in the political process based on religious grounds.
Your statement that "My point stands. RW and libs like him, are anti-Christian bigots" is untrue. It implies that he hates all people of the Christian faith just by virtue of their belief in this faith. RW might himself be a Christian.
Bigots can being bigoted against their own people, and/or have exceptions to their bigotry. That RW, might identify as a Christian, does not mean that he is not bigoted against Christians.
Your reference to the "lib agenda" is overtly political and revealing. You, and many others who call yourselves Christians are trying to push your political views as being a defining and identifying part of the Christian faith, which is false. They may be opposed by other Christians, and non-Christians alike, without these people's opposition being said to be rooted in a "hatred" for the Christian faith. Many Christians believe that your views are contrary to the central precepts of Christianity.
I do not do that. Those that do, I disagree with. I agree that not all opposition to the Religious Right, is motivated by hate or bigotry. But anyone that thinks that it is somehow wrong for the Religious Right to support Trump politically, is probably being a bigot.
All people have a right to participate in the political process based on religious grounds or other grounds, but you are trying to escape criticism and opposition by stamping a "Christian" label on your political views, asserting that opposition to them is opposition to God," as if there were any equivalence, and then crying "hatred," "discrimination," and "persecution," all of which is absurd.
This thread is an attack on a sizable group of Christians for supporting President Trump. RW is attacking the Religious Right for supporting a political leader that is willing to ally with them and support their goals. My position is that there is nothing wrong with them doing that.
You presentation of what I am doing here, is just not true.
Addendum: after writing this, I went to another thread and found this:
GRAPHIC: Tenn. deputy, pastor calls for LGBTQ executions in sermon
The people you seek to defend need to straighten (no pun intended) themselves out.
Never heard of him. Off topic.
He is an example of one of your "Christians," calling for the murder of other people, including other Christians, abusing the Christian faith to do it, and implying that he is an example of the Christian faith.
Yet, what about him, supports the idea of this thread, that it some how wrong of the Religious Right to support Trump?
You stated in your previous post that Christians have the right to engage in the political process. Supporting a Presidential Candidate is part of that.
That seems to indicate that you agree with me, on the thread topic.
Is it just impossible for you to admit that?