Trump is a pathological liar

[mudwhistle]

Trump is a pathological liar
(in my view)
A pathological liar is someone who lies compulsively. While there appears to be many possible causes forpathological lying, it's not yet entirely understood why someone would lie this way. ... Compulsive lying is also a known trait of some personality disorders, such as antisocial personality disorder.27 Aug 2018

Pathological lying, also known as mythomania and pseudologia fantastica, is the chronic behavior of compulsive or habitual lying.

Unlike telling the occasional white lie to avoid hurting someone’s feelings or getting in trouble, a pathological liar seems to lie for no apparent reason. This can make it frustrating or hard to know what to do if you believe you’ve met one.

Though pathological lying has been recognized for more than a century, there’s not yet a clear universal definition of the condition.

Some pathological lying may result from a mental condition, such as antisocial personality disorder (sometimes called sociopathy), while others appear to have

no medical reason for the behavior.

Pathological Liar: How to Cope with Someone’s Compulsive Lies

This is a mental illness

,.,,.There is one person who we do not want to have a mental illness.
,.,.,That is the one who controls our army
.,;.,That is the one who controls our navy
,.;.,That is the one who controls our air force
,.'.;That is the one who has the executive order that can bring death
,.;,Is Trump the one-?
';.,I say No!!!!!!.........


What say you-?

-

Hillary is a pathological liar that puts anything Trump says to shame.......but for some reason she was proudly declared to be the most qualified candidate to ever run for POTUS.

 

[Aldo Raine]

Trump is a pathological liar
(in my view)
A pathological liar is someone who lies compulsively. While there appears to be many possible causes forpathological lying, it's not yet entirely understood why someone would lie this way. ... Compulsive lying is also a known trait of some personality disorders, such as antisocial personality disorder.27 Aug 2018

Pathological lying, also known as mythomania and pseudologia fantastica, is the chronic behavior of compulsive or habitual lying.

Unlike telling the occasional white lie to avoid hurting someone’s feelings or getting in trouble, a pathological liar seems to lie for no apparent reason. This can make it frustrating or hard to know what to do if you believe you’ve met one.

Though pathological lying has been recognized for more than a century, there’s not yet a clear universal definition of the condition.

Some pathological lying may result from a mental condition, such as antisocial personality disorder (sometimes called sociopathy), while others appear to have

no medical reason for the behavior.

Pathological Liar: How to Cope with Someone’s Compulsive Lies

This is a mental illness

,.,,.There is one person who we do not want to have a mental illness.
,.,.,That is the one who controls our army
.,;.,That is the one who controls our navy
,.;.,That is the one who controls our air force
,.'.;That is the one who has the executive order that can bring death
,.;,Is Trump the one-?
';.,I say No!!!!!!.........


What say you-?

-

You could have saved your self a lot of time and effort by just typing:

He's a politician.



How can you tell when a politician is lying? His lips are moving.


.

Bbbbbbbbuuuuuutttttt that is why so many claimed they voted for the liar. Because he WASN'T a politician!
MAGA

 

[okfine]

Feds end investigation into Trump Org and hush money payments - CNNPolitics

Federal prosecutors in New York have ended their investigation into the Trump Organization's role in hush money payments made to women who alleged affairs with President Donald Trump and have been ordered by a judge to release additional information connected to their related probe of former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen, according to court documents filed Wednesday.

CNN reported Friday that the Manhattan US Attorney's office had approached the end of its investigation of the Trump Organization and wasn't poised to charge any executives involved in the company's effort to reimburse Cohen for money he allegedly paid to silence one of the women.

ANOTHER WIN FOR TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hey, USMB liberals -- I believe you were saying something about Trump facing trial in New York after he's out of the White House?

You guys couldn't predict the sun coming up tomorrow. You'd say it'd rise in the west.

Is he out of the WH?

 

[okfine]

Trump is a pathological liar
(in my view)
A pathological liar is someone who lies compulsively. While there appears to be many possible causes forpathological lying, it's not yet entirely understood why someone would lie this way. ... Compulsive lying is also a known trait of some personality disorders, such as antisocial personality disorder.27 Aug 2018

Pathological lying, also known as mythomania and pseudologia fantastica, is the chronic behavior of compulsive or habitual lying.

Unlike telling the occasional white lie to avoid hurting someone’s feelings or getting in trouble, a pathological liar seems to lie for no apparent reason. This can make it frustrating or hard to know what to do if you believe you’ve met one.

Though pathological lying has been recognized for more than a century, there’s not yet a clear universal definition of the condition.

Some pathological lying may result from a mental condition, such as antisocial personality disorder (sometimes called sociopathy), while others appear to have

no medical reason for the behavior.

Pathological Liar: How to Cope with Someone’s Compulsive Lies

This is a mental illness

,.,,.There is one person who we do not want to have a mental illness.
,.,.,That is the one who controls our ar
.,;.,That is the one who controls our navy
,.;.,That is the one who controls our air force
,.'.;That is the one who has the executive order that can bring death
,.;,Is Trump the one-?
';.,I say No!!!!!!.........


What say you-?

-

There is no notation of lying or pathological lying in my copy of the DSM-IV; that said:

• Trump is a liar, of that there is no doubt
• Trump suffers from Personality Disorders
  • Cluster A: Paranoid,
  • Cluster B: Antisocial, Histrionic, Narcissistic
  • Cluster C: Dependent

Each of the Personality Disorders need to be assessed by a Professional Medical Team, and ruled out; watching the President and listening to him should convince anyone familiar with the DSM that he is not fit to be President of the United States.

you: Each of the Personality Disorders need to be assessed by a Professional Medical Team, and ruled out

you again, immediately after: i am not a professional but trump is clearly suffering from personality disorders

How is it you take yourself seriously?

Because I'm educated, because during my 32-year career in law enforcement I had encounters with mentally ill persons, some very dangerous, others harmless but a danger to themselves.

And because I'm honest, and I express my opinions to both enlighten others, and to have those who can criticize my opinions (without calling me a libtard, moron, stupid, etc. none of which describe me) and enlighten me or correct me.

I took a one year course in graduate school, Testing for Counselors, before I decided on my career choice. The class took all kinds of psychological tests and learned how to score them by scoring the tests taken by others in the class; of course no one knew whose test they scored.

And you think that qualifies you to diagnose the mental problems of someone you've never talked to?

You can eat all your own shit you like. Just don't expect rational people to believe you when you say it's yummy.

I know your biases control you, and not the rational mind. I did not offer a "diagnose", I pointed out data which you could if you weren't willfully ignorant to read, and make up your own mind on the sanity of The President. I did post rule out, didn't I?

I offered an opinion, and I'm not alone. Trump is a man-child, by that non clinical assessment it mean immature, childish and unfit for The Presidency.

I wouldn't waste my time with right-wing ignorance. And there is a lot of it here.

 

[Wry Catcher]

There is no notation of lying or pathological lying in my copy of the DSM-IV; that said:

• Trump is a liar, of that there is no doubt
• Trump suffers from Personality Disorders
  • Cluster A: Paranoid,
  • Cluster B: Antisocial, Histrionic, Narcissistic
  • Cluster C: Dependent

Each of the Personality Disorders need to be assessed by a Professional Medical Team, and ruled out; watching the President and listening to him should convince anyone familiar with the DSM that he is not fit to be President of the United States.

you: Each of the Personality Disorders need to be assessed by a Professional Medical Team, and ruled out

you again, immediately after: i am not a professional but trump is clearly suffering from personality disorders

How is it you take yourself seriously?

Because I'm educated, because during my 32-year career in law enforcement I had encounters with mentally ill persons, some very dangerous, others harmless but a danger to themselves.

And because I'm honest, and I express my opinions to both enlighten others, and to have those who can criticize my opinions (without calling me a libtard, moron, stupid, etc. none of which describe me) and enlighten me or correct me.

I took a one year course in graduate school, Testing for Counselors, before I decided on my career choice. The class took all kinds of psychological tests and learned how to score them by scoring the tests taken by others in the class; of course no one knew whose test they scored.

And you think that qualifies you to diagnose the mental problems of someone you've never talked to?

You can eat all your own shit you like. Just don't expect rational people to believe you when you say it's yummy.

I know your biases control you, and not the rational mind. I did not offer a "diagnose", I pointed out data which you could if you weren't willfully ignorant to read, and make up your own mind on the sanity of The President. I did post rule out, didn't I?

I offered an opinion, and I'm not alone. Trump is a man-child, by that non clinical assessment it mean immature, childish and unfit for The Presidency.

It's always funny when a leftist plays the I DIDN'T SAY WHAT I SAID game.

Always funny. Never credible.

When without a substantive post, and not a shread of thought, you always respond with an ad hominem. AKA: an idiot-gram.

 

[Wry Catcher]

There is no notation of lying or pathological lying in my copy of the DSM-IV; that said:

• Trump is a liar, of that there is no doubt
• Trump suffers from Personality Disorders
  • Cluster A: Paranoid,
  • Cluster B: Antisocial, Histrionic, Narcissistic
  • Cluster C: Dependent

Each of the Personality Disorders need to be assessed by a Professional Medical Team, and ruled out; watching the President and listening to him should convince anyone familiar with the DSM that he is not fit to be President of the United States.

you: Each of the Personality Disorders need to be assessed by a Professional Medical Team, and ruled out

you again, immediately after: i am not a professional but trump is clearly suffering from personality disorders

How is it you take yourself seriously?

Because I'm educated, because during my 32-year career in law enforcement I had encounters with mentally ill persons, some very dangerous, others harmless but a danger to themselves.

And because I'm honest, and I express my opinions to both enlighten others, and to have those who can criticize my opinions (without calling me a libtard, moron, stupid, etc. none of which describe me) and enlighten me or correct me.

I took a one year course in graduate school, Testing for Counselors, before I decided on my career choice. The class took all kinds of psychological tests and learned how to score them by scoring the tests taken by others in the class; of course no one knew whose test they scored.

And you think that qualifies you to diagnose the mental problems of someone you've never talked to?

You can eat all your own shit you like. Just don't expect rational people to believe you when you say it's yummy.

I know your biases control you, and not the rational mind. I did not offer a "diagnose", I pointed out data which you could if you weren't willfully ignorant to read, and make up your own mind on the sanity of The President. I did post rule out, didn't I?

I offered an opinion, and I'm not alone. Trump is a man-child, by that non clinical assessment it mean immature, childish and unfit for The Presidency.

I wouldn't waste my time with right-wing ignorance. And there is a lot of it here.

I agree, but it is so much fun. Especially when they all collect in the same thread and echo each other (apparently) not knowing the conspiracy theory they all agree to is not a theory, it is; it generally never reached the scientific requirements of a good hypothesis:

Requirements of a Scientific Hypothesis

• Educated Guess. The composition of a hypothesis is essentially a creative process, but it should be done based on existing knowledge of the subject matter.
• Testable. One important requirement of a scientific hypothesis is that it is testable.
• Falsifiable ("The requirement of falsifiability means that conclusions cannot be drawn from simple observation of a particular phenomenon.")

 

[daveman]

Feds end investigation into Trump Org and hush money payments - CNNPolitics

Federal prosecutors in New York have ended their investigation into the Trump Organization's role in hush money payments made to women who alleged affairs with President Donald Trump and have been ordered by a judge to release additional information connected to their related probe of former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen, according to court documents filed Wednesday.

CNN reported Friday that the Manhattan US Attorney's office had approached the end of its investigation of the Trump Organization and wasn't poised to charge any executives involved in the company's effort to reimburse Cohen for money he allegedly paid to silence one of the women.

ANOTHER WIN FOR TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hey, USMB liberals -- I believe you were saying something about Trump facing trial in New York after he's out of the White House?

You guys couldn't predict the sun coming up tomorrow. You'd say it'd rise in the west.

Is he out of the WH?

You...you did read the investigation was ended with no charges, right?

 

[daveman]

you: Each of the Personality Disorders need to be assessed by a Professional Medical Team, and ruled out

you again, immediately after: i am not a professional but trump is clearly suffering from personality disorders

How is it you take yourself seriously?

Because I'm educated, because during my 32-year career in law enforcement I had encounters with mentally ill persons, some very dangerous, others harmless but a danger to themselves.

And because I'm honest, and I express my opinions to both enlighten others, and to have those who can criticize my opinions (without calling me a libtard, moron, stupid, etc. none of which describe me) and enlighten me or correct me.

I took a one year course in graduate school, Testing for Counselors, before I decided on my career choice. The class took all kinds of psychological tests and learned how to score them by scoring the tests taken by others in the class; of course no one knew whose test they scored.

And you think that qualifies you to diagnose the mental problems of someone you've never talked to?

You can eat all your own shit you like. Just don't expect rational people to believe you when you say it's yummy.

I know your biases control you, and not the rational mind. I did not offer a "diagnose", I pointed out data which you could if you weren't willfully ignorant to read, and make up your own mind on the sanity of The President. I did post rule out, didn't I?

I offered an opinion, and I'm not alone. Trump is a man-child, by that non clinical assessment it mean immature, childish and unfit for The Presidency.

It's always funny when a leftist plays the I DIDN'T SAY WHAT I SAID game.

Always funny. Never credible.

When without a substantive post, and not a shread of thought, you always respond with an ad hominem. AKA: an idiot-gram.

DAMMIT DAVE YOUR SUPPOSED TO BELIEVE ME WHEN I SAY THINGS BECAUSE I SAY THEM

 

[daveman]

you: Each of the Personality Disorders need to be assessed by a Professional Medical Team, and ruled out

you again, immediately after: i am not a professional but trump is clearly suffering from personality disorders

How is it you take yourself seriously?

Because I'm educated, because during my 32-year career in law enforcement I had encounters with mentally ill persons, some very dangerous, others harmless but a danger to themselves.

And because I'm honest, and I express my opinions to both enlighten others, and to have those who can criticize my opinions (without calling me a libtard, moron, stupid, etc. none of which describe me) and enlighten me or correct me.

I took a one year course in graduate school, Testing for Counselors, before I decided on my career choice. The class took all kinds of psychological tests and learned how to score them by scoring the tests taken by others in the class; of course no one knew whose test they scored.

And you think that qualifies you to diagnose the mental problems of someone you've never talked to?

You can eat all your own shit you like. Just don't expect rational people to believe you when you say it's yummy.

I know your biases control you, and not the rational mind. I did not offer a "diagnose", I pointed out data which you could if you weren't willfully ignorant to read, and make up your own mind on the sanity of The President. I did post rule out, didn't I?

I offered an opinion, and I'm not alone. Trump is a man-child, by that non clinical assessment it mean immature, childish and unfit for The Presidency.

I wouldn't waste my time with right-wing ignorance. And there is a lot of it here.

I agree, but it is so much fun. Especially when they all collect in the same thread and echo each other (apparently) not knowing the conspiracy theory they all agree to is not a theory, it is; it generally never reached the scientific requirements of a good hypothesis:

Requirements of a Scientific Hypothesis

• Educated Guess. The composition of a hypothesis is essentially a creative process, but it should be done based on existing knowledge of the subject matter.
• Testable. One important requirement of a scientific hypothesis is that it is testable.
• Falsifiable ("The requirement of falsifiability means that conclusions cannot be drawn from simple observation of a particular phenomenon.")

Your first bullet is laughable at best.

Your second bullet -- you have not done it. Nor have any of the "experts" who make the same claim you have.

Your third bullet -- you have drawn a conclusion from a simple observation.

Congratulations. You just proved your clams are simply not credible. I'm guessing that's not what you intended...?

 

[JWBooth]

Trump is a pathological liar
(in my view)
A pathological liar is someone who lies compulsively. While there appears to be many possible causes forpathological lying, it's not yet entirely understood why someone would lie this way. ... Compulsive lying is also a known trait of some personality disorders, such as antisocial personality disorder.27 Aug 2018

Pathological lying, also known as mythomania and pseudologia fantastica, is the chronic behavior of compulsive or habitual lying.

Unlike telling the occasional white lie to avoid hurting someone’s feelings or getting in trouble, a pathological liar seems to lie for no apparent reason. This can make it frustrating or hard to know what to do if you believe you’ve met one.

Though pathological lying has been recognized for more than a century, there’s not yet a clear universal definition of the condition.

Some pathological lying may result from a mental condition, such as antisocial personality disorder (sometimes called sociopathy), while others appear to have

no medical reason for the behavior.

Pathological Liar: How to Cope with Someone’s Compulsive Lies

This is a mental illness

,.,,.There is one person who we do not want to have a mental illness.
,.,.,That is the one who controls our army
.,;.,That is the one who controls our navy
,.;.,That is the one who controls our air force
,.'.;That is the one who has the executive order that can bring death
,.;,Is Trump the one-?
';.,I say No!!!!!!.........


What say you-?

-

He’s a politician and from NYC, part of the package.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Because I'm educated, because during my 32-year career in law enforcement I had encounters with mentally ill persons, some very dangerous, others harmless but a danger to themselves.

And because I'm honest, and I express my opinions to both enlighten others, and to have those who can criticize my opinions (without calling me a libtard, moron, stupid, etc. none of which describe me) and enlighten me or correct me.

I took a one year course in graduate school, Testing for Counselors, before I decided on my career choice. The class took all kinds of psychological tests and learned how to score them by scoring the tests taken by others in the class; of course no one knew whose test they scored.

And you think that qualifies you to diagnose the mental problems of someone you've never talked to?

You can eat all your own shit you like. Just don't expect rational people to believe you when you say it's yummy.

I know your biases control you, and not the rational mind. I did not offer a "diagnose", I pointed out data which you could if you weren't willfully ignorant to read, and make up your own mind on the sanity of The President. I did post rule out, didn't I?

I offered an opinion, and I'm not alone. Trump is a man-child, by that non clinical assessment it mean immature, childish and unfit for The Presidency.

I wouldn't waste my time with right-wing ignorance. And there is a lot of it here.

I agree, but it is so much fun. Especially when they all collect in the same thread and echo each other (apparently) not knowing the conspiracy theory they all agree to is not a theory, it is; it generally never reached the scientific requirements of a good hypothesis:

Requirements of a Scientific Hypothesis

• Educated Guess. The composition of a hypothesis is essentially a creative process, but it should be done based on existing knowledge of the subject matter.
• Testable. One important requirement of a scientific hypothesis is that it is testable.
• Falsifiable ("The requirement of falsifiability means that conclusions cannot be drawn from simple observation of a particular phenomenon.")

Your first bullet is laughable at best.

Your second bullet -- you have not done it. Nor have any of the "experts" who make the same claim you have.

Your third bullet -- you have drawn a conclusion from a simple observation.

Congratulations. You just proved your clams are simply not credible. I'm guessing that's not what you intended...?

I guess I should believe you and not my biology teacher my freshman year of high school who spent a week on the Scientific Method, as well as the chapters in Euclidean Geometry which consists in assuming a small set of intuitively appealing axioms, and deducing many other propositions (theorems) from these.

 

[Staidhup]

One of the job description requirements to be president, and or an elected politician, is they must first be a pathological liar, second devoid of morality, and most importantly third, posses illusions of grandeur and self righteousness. So what else is new?
The next thing the Dim’s will claim is that only repub’s are liars. Love it.

 

[Wry Catcher]

One of the job description requirements to be president, and or an elected politician, is they must first be a pathological liar, second devoid of morality, and most importantly third, posses illusions of grandeur and self righteousness. So what else is new?
The next thing the Dim’s will claim is that only repub’s are liars. Love it.

Why spend so many key strokes when all you need to do is post: "I hate Democrats". Since hate is an emotion, usually irrational, you needn't need to offer anything else. We get it, you only need to post it once, then you can go watch Sesame Street reruns.

 

[daveman]

And you think that qualifies you to diagnose the mental problems of someone you've never talked to?

You can eat all your own shit you like. Just don't expect rational people to believe you when you say it's yummy.

I know your biases control you, and not the rational mind. I did not offer a "diagnose", I pointed out data which you could if you weren't willfully ignorant to read, and make up your own mind on the sanity of The President. I did post rule out, didn't I?

I offered an opinion, and I'm not alone. Trump is a man-child, by that non clinical assessment it mean immature, childish and unfit for The Presidency.

I wouldn't waste my time with right-wing ignorance. And there is a lot of it here.

I agree, but it is so much fun. Especially when they all collect in the same thread and echo each other (apparently) not knowing the conspiracy theory they all agree to is not a theory, it is; it generally never reached the scientific requirements of a good hypothesis:

Requirements of a Scientific Hypothesis

• Educated Guess. The composition of a hypothesis is essentially a creative process, but it should be done based on existing knowledge of the subject matter.
• Testable. One important requirement of a scientific hypothesis is that it is testable.
• Falsifiable ("The requirement of falsifiability means that conclusions cannot be drawn from simple observation of a particular phenomenon.")

Your first bullet is laughable at best.

Your second bullet -- you have not done it. Nor have any of the "experts" who make the same claim you have.

Your third bullet -- you have drawn a conclusion from a simple observation.

Congratulations. You just proved your clams are simply not credible. I'm guessing that's not what you intended...?

I guess I should believe you and not my biology teacher my freshman year of high school who spent a week on the Scientific Method, as well as the chapters in Euclidean Geometry which consists in assuming a small set of intuitively appealing axioms, and deducing many other propositions (theorems) from these.

You should believe me. Your biology teacher would agree with me...unless he's a pompous, self-important irrational Trump-hater like you.

 

[daveman]

One of the job description requirements to be president, and or an elected politician, is they must first be a pathological liar, second devoid of morality, and most importantly third, posses illusions of grandeur and self righteousness. So what else is new?
The next thing the Dim’s will claim is that only repub’s are liars. Love it.

Why spend so many key strokes when all you need to do is post: "I hate Democrats". Since hate is an emotion, usually irrational, you needn't need to offer anything else. We get it, you only need to post it once, then you can go watch Sesame Street reruns.

Hypocrite.

 

[Wry Catcher]

I know your biases control you, and not the rational mind. I did not offer a "diagnose", I pointed out data which you could if you weren't willfully ignorant to read, and make up your own mind on the sanity of The President. I did post rule out, didn't I?

I offered an opinion, and I'm not alone. Trump is a man-child, by that non clinical assessment it mean immature, childish and unfit for The Presidency.

I wouldn't waste my time with right-wing ignorance. And there is a lot of it here.

I agree, but it is so much fun. Especially when they all collect in the same thread and echo each other (apparently) not knowing the conspiracy theory they all agree to is not a theory, it is; it generally never reached the scientific requirements of a good hypothesis:

Requirements of a Scientific Hypothesis

• Educated Guess. The composition of a hypothesis is essentially a creative process, but it should be done based on existing knowledge of the subject matter.
• Testable. One important requirement of a scientific hypothesis is that it is testable.
• Falsifiable ("The requirement of falsifiability means that conclusions cannot be drawn from simple observation of a particular phenomenon.")

Your first bullet is laughable at best.

Your second bullet -- you have not done it. Nor have any of the "experts" who make the same claim you have.

Your third bullet -- you have drawn a conclusion from a simple observation.

Congratulations. You just proved your clams are simply not credible. I'm guessing that's not what you intended...?

I guess I should believe you and not my biology teacher my freshman year of high school who spent a week on the Scientific Method, as well as the chapters in Euclidean Geometry which consists in assuming a small set of intuitively appealing axioms, and deducing many other propositions (theorems) from these.

You should believe me. Your biology teacher would agree with me...unless he's a pompous, self-important irrational Trump-hater like you.

I'm suspect she has passed away, Freshman Biology was in the year 1962. Any other errors you'd like to share with me?

 

[Wry Catcher]

One of the job description requirements to be president, and or an elected politician, is they must first be a pathological liar, second devoid of morality, and most importantly third, posses illusions of grandeur and self righteousness. So what else is new?
The next thing the Dim’s will claim is that only repub’s are liars. Love it.

Why spend so many key strokes when all you need to do is post: "I hate Democrats". Since hate is an emotion, usually irrational, you needn't need to offer anything else. We get it, you only need to post it once, then you can go watch Sesame Street reruns.

Hypocrite.

I can state without hesitation that I don't hate anyone. Hate is an emotion as strong as love; I can also state unequivocally that I only love my immediate family, and the dogs and cats I've lived with in my 71 years.

 

[daveman]

I wouldn't waste my time with right-wing ignorance. And there is a lot of it here.

I agree, but it is so much fun. Especially when they all collect in the same thread and echo each other (apparently) not knowing the conspiracy theory they all agree to is not a theory, it is; it generally never reached the scientific requirements of a good hypothesis:

Requirements of a Scientific Hypothesis

• Educated Guess. The composition of a hypothesis is essentially a creative process, but it should be done based on existing knowledge of the subject matter.
• Testable. One important requirement of a scientific hypothesis is that it is testable.
• Falsifiable ("The requirement of falsifiability means that conclusions cannot be drawn from simple observation of a particular phenomenon.")

Your first bullet is laughable at best.

Your second bullet -- you have not done it. Nor have any of the "experts" who make the same claim you have.

Your third bullet -- you have drawn a conclusion from a simple observation.

Congratulations. You just proved your clams are simply not credible. I'm guessing that's not what you intended...?

I guess I should believe you and not my biology teacher my freshman year of high school who spent a week on the Scientific Method, as well as the chapters in Euclidean Geometry which consists in assuming a small set of intuitively appealing axioms, and deducing many other propositions (theorems) from these.

You should believe me. Your biology teacher would agree with me...unless he's a pompous, self-important irrational Trump-hater like you.

I'm suspect she has passed away, Freshman Biology was in the year 1962. Any other errors you'd like to share with me?

How is that an error when there is no way I could have known that?

You are so damn pathetic.

Meanwhile, you still don't accept that Because You Say So is not the scientific method.

 

[daveman]

One of the job description requirements to be president, and or an elected politician, is they must first be a pathological liar, second devoid of morality, and most importantly third, posses illusions of grandeur and self righteousness. So what else is new?
The next thing the Dim’s will claim is that only repub’s are liars. Love it.

Why spend so many key strokes when all you need to do is post: "I hate Democrats". Since hate is an emotion, usually irrational, you needn't need to offer anything else. We get it, you only need to post it once, then you can go watch Sesame Street reruns.

Hypocrite.

I can state without hesitation that I don't hate anyone. Hate is an emotion as strong as love; I can also state unequivocally that I only love my immediate family, and the dogs and cats I've lived with in my 71 years.

You're 71? Holy shit. You come across as an angry teenager.

 

[Wry Catcher]

I agree, but it is so much fun. Especially when they all collect in the same thread and echo each other (apparently) not knowing the conspiracy theory they all agree to is not a theory, it is; it generally never reached the scientific requirements of a good hypothesis:

Requirements of a Scientific Hypothesis

• Educated Guess. The composition of a hypothesis is essentially a creative process, but it should be done based on existing knowledge of the subject matter.
• Testable. One important requirement of a scientific hypothesis is that it is testable.
• Falsifiable ("The requirement of falsifiability means that conclusions cannot be drawn from simple observation of a particular phenomenon.")

Your first bullet is laughable at best.

Your second bullet -- you have not done it. Nor have any of the "experts" who make the same claim you have.

Your third bullet -- you have drawn a conclusion from a simple observation.

Congratulations. You just proved your clams are simply not credible. I'm guessing that's not what you intended...?

I guess I should believe you and not my biology teacher my freshman year of high school who spent a week on the Scientific Method, as well as the chapters in Euclidean Geometry which consists in assuming a small set of intuitively appealing axioms, and deducing many other propositions (theorems) from these.

You should believe me. Your biology teacher would agree with me...unless he's a pompous, self-important irrational Trump-hater like you.

I'm suspect she has passed away, Freshman Biology was in the year 1962. Any other errors you'd like to share with me?

How is that an error when there is no way I could have known that?

You are so damn pathetic.

Meanwhile, you still don't accept that Because You Say So is not the scientific method.

Gee, an ad hominem + a Straw Man ^^^; you really are a clown.