Trump has been 100% EXONERATED again!

What a waste of time and money.
Not true. Wasn't 100 per cent exonerated. Unless I missed something - you mean all 100 Senators exonerated him? I though the majority found him guilty??

Of course Trump was exonerated. He was proven innocent and acquitted.

Wasn't hard, the Democrats are lying fascists, they never cared what Trump actually did. The whole thing was just motivated by hate
 
What a waste of time and money.
Not true. Wasn't 100 per cent exonerated. Unless I missed something - you mean all 100 Senators exonerated him? I though the majority found him guilty??
Well impeach him again.....and again......does that make you goofballs happy? Especially when your own party has a mass murderer loose in New York that SHOULD be impeached.
he isnt President anymore, so cannot Impeach him anymore :(
He wasn't president when you impeached him last time.....are you having a hard time keeping up through all your whining???
he wasn't President January 11th when they impeached him?
 
I genuinely cannot tell if you're just messing with me, or if you literally don't remember the impeachment last month. it was like...4 weeks ago dude.
 
What a waste of time and money.
Not true. Wasn't 100 per cent exonerated. Unless I missed something - you mean all 100 Senators exonerated him? I though the majority found him guilty??
Well impeach him again.....and again......does that make you goofballs happy? Especially when your own party has a mass murderer loose in New York that SHOULD be impeached.
he isnt President anymore, so cannot Impeach him anymore :(
He wasn't president when you impeached him last time.....are you having a hard time keeping up through all your whining???
he wasn't President January 11th when they impeached him?
He was out of office when the farce actually took place....saying isn't the same as when it actually takes place
 
I genuinely cannot tell if you're just messing with me, or if you literally don't remember the impeachment last month. it was like...4 weeks ago dude.
When did the "trial" and vote take place.....dude.
 
What a waste of time and money.
Not true. Wasn't 100 per cent exonerated. Unless I missed something - you mean all 100 Senators exonerated him? I though the majority found him guilty??
Well impeach him again.....and again......does that make you goofballs happy? Especially when your own party has a mass murderer loose in New York that SHOULD be impeached.
he isnt President anymore, so cannot Impeach him anymore :(
He wasn't president when you impeached him last time.....are you having a hard time keeping up through all your whining???
he wasn't President January 11th when they impeached him?

Yes, Democrats had the power to impeach him on January 11. The trial however was after he was out of office when it was already over.

Note the Constitution says "removal from office." How do you remove someone from office who isn't in office?
 
Trump still OWNS prime property in the heads of Democrats and snowflakes....

...meanwhile there is a call to investigate Pelosi for being warned of the pending violence by the FBI and doing nothing, Cuomo is about to be up on charges for 15,000 counts of Manslaughter, & Biden can't remember getting vaccine shots on 21 Dec 2020 & the 1st week in Jan 2021, explaining why he claimed vaccines did not exist until he took office...

Bwuhahahahaha

:p
 
He was proven innocent

Oh boy, a horse-beater. And beater. And beater.

Once again, in unison------ "Don Trump was not proven innocent."

THAT is not what a political Impeachment and Trial does. You are thinking of a criminal trial by jury.

Don Trump was politically acquitted of the charge of inciting an insurrection (or words close to that.)

If the poster wants to say "innocent" in this context, then OJ Simpson was innocent. The thing both of those 'trials' have in common is the reality of jury-nullification.
 
Awwww does someone criticizing the dead vote upset you and make your pelosi tighten???
What is the "dead vote"? Like zombies?
No, zombies are people who are in an eternal afterlife state because they didn't wear a mask when told by the Gestapo and were smitten with the leftyvirus. Dead people are voters the Dems resurrect on fake ballots every election, its one of their well established patterns of cheating.
Yes, Donald Trump lost because...Democrats...resurrected the dead. sure lady.
Well, with the leftyvirus fake mailin ballots from China, its quite possible that dead votes were fairly infrequent.....because any name could be attached to the ballot being filled out by numerous libber workers at the polls as they were never checked. Imagine that.....millions of ballots with only "Biden" selected nobody bothered to quality check.
Go kick rocks, lady. Donald Trump lost the election. By like 7 or 8 million votes. There were no resurrected voters, the Democrats are not Necromancers. Y'all just got your butt kicked. That's all. Move on.
Sure lady (since for some reason you call me that). Without millions of fake mailin ballots, Pinochijoe wouldn't have been close. How many counties did he win, fewer then Hildabeast right? We all know the scam that just took place.
I thought you were a female. sorry... anyways, y'all lost. move on. It was not even close.
I have moved on....a little less than before though with gas prices so high now.
LOLOL

You know you're a ******* nut, don't you?

Nationally, gas prices are up only 0.066¢ on average since a year ago...


LOL, the guy who needs to look at his avatar before calling someone a "******* nut," LOL.

Interesting self image you have there sport
Aww, poor guy. Thanks for letting me know you're bothered by my avatar. :itsok:

And yes, someone complaining about gas prices under Biden while ignoring gas prices under Trump, which were just 0.066¢ lower a year ago, is a ******* nut. Did that hit too close to home for you too?

:abgg2q.jpg:

Your avatar is hilarious. I love it. It clearly identifies you as the nut that you are. And that you pick Trump as your self selected self image is hilarious. It's funny as hell, angry fascist man
Regarding Kaz's Law, it's virtually a certainty that a wingnut can't finish three sentences without deploying the word leftist.

You don't like being identified as the leftist that you are? Hit a nerve there, huh? Why exactly would it bother you to be called a leftist when you endlessly advocate leftist ideology?
I wasn't commenting on what I don't like to be called but on the weakness in your habit of invoking the boogeyman.

BOO!

Then why can't you debate any of my points rather than objecting to a word I used correctly, fascist?
You don't make points, you just rattle on about boogeymen and generalizations.

Try offering a proposition followed by evidence and than draw a conclusion. Here's a tip for you, avoid name-calling, and keep adjectives to a minimum. You might be surprised.

The guy calling anyone who isn't a Democrat having a "Trump crush" is whining about "generalizations" again, LOL. Funny stuff.

That' while the number of Democrats fighting Democrat fascism is actually zero
What's funny is that you are inferring an absolute, a logical fallacy.

So now we have two. First you got all hot and bothered I called you a leftist, you ignored my question how you're not. Now you're all hot and bothered defending that Democrats aren't fascist, but you can't show any Democrat who has opposed violence, firing and other Democrat party fascism to destroy their opposition
I'm 75, I don't get hot and bothered much anymore. But keep trying, Trump's failed court cases convinced morons that there was an election theft.

John Lewis opposed non-violence so I just proved you wrong that I couldn't name any. Perhaps you now appreciate why I harp about the fallacious use of absolutes. You lose.

You're just blathering. There was election fraud. Democrats removed vote counting ability all going into the election. They didn't do that to not cheat. But even if there wasn't, this used to be a free country to state our opinion. That Trump stating his opinion is illegal is why you are now just a fascist party. Calling for violence means DIRECTLY CALLING FOR VIOLENCE. Or it used to until the fascist Democrats started attacking and destroying your opposition as you delve deeper and deeper into fascism.

Note you're silent to the flagrant hypocrisy that Democrats stoked hatred all summer in people who went out and murdered people and you're silent about it, leftist fascist
There's always election fraud, but it is not exclusively from one side of the aisle.

More importantly, there has been no evidence presented to even hint at WIDESPREAD fraud.

If we are to have any meaningful conversation, you need to quit generalizing about who I am. I have no cotton to violence perpetrated by anyone, be they antifa or WS groups. Neither do I dismiss black anger over the cold-blooded murder of George Floyd.

My profession has me intimately familiar with the difficulty of getting inside of someone's head and proving the likes of fraud. Hence, I appreciate your complaint about calling for violence. The Dems made the wrong charge. They should have confined themselves to the disgraceful way he dragged his feet in reacting to the riot. Had he been a soldier in time of war, and so abandoned his duty and post, he would have been stood before a firing squad and shot.

Democrats cheated systematically in the open and stole the election. They directly removed monitors and any ability to verify voters and stole the election. To say some Republican cheated somewhere and so it's the same is more of your stupid crap
If you have evidence of widespread fraud, show it. Trump had none which is why he was tossed from court more than five dozen times ... including by judges who he appointed.

But, he made enough noise with his bull to con people like you. Open your eyes, you've been had.

I already gave you two examples and you ignored them
You gave me nothing.
Let's have a link to something specific.

You were blathering on you wanted support for something you apparently couldn't identify.

Let me know when you figure out the subject
Election fraud.

I'm asking you for a link to something that establishes that there was widespread fraud.

What do you have?

You need a link to my first two examples that Democrats moved election monitors away from the counters and Democrats eliminated barriers to linking votes to legal voters? Seriously? Where were you during the election? Were you out of the country, stoned off your ass or in a Democrat party cult?
No, I was here, and paying close attention.

Keep coming back with nothing and I'll keep pounding you.

Pounding me, LOL. You were paying close attention while the thieves were walking right past you. You'll believe anything, it's hilarious
I'll take your gibberish as a no; you don't have any hard evidence - just empty rhetoric.
 
Awwww does someone criticizing the dead vote upset you and make your pelosi tighten???
What is the "dead vote"? Like zombies?
No, zombies are people who are in an eternal afterlife state because they didn't wear a mask when told by the Gestapo and were smitten with the leftyvirus. Dead people are voters the Dems resurrect on fake ballots every election, its one of their well established patterns of cheating.
Yes, Donald Trump lost because...Democrats...resurrected the dead. sure lady.
Well, with the leftyvirus fake mailin ballots from China, its quite possible that dead votes were fairly infrequent.....because any name could be attached to the ballot being filled out by numerous libber workers at the polls as they were never checked. Imagine that.....millions of ballots with only "Biden" selected nobody bothered to quality check.
Go kick rocks, lady. Donald Trump lost the election. By like 7 or 8 million votes. There were no resurrected voters, the Democrats are not Necromancers. Y'all just got your butt kicked. That's all. Move on.
Sure lady (since for some reason you call me that). Without millions of fake mailin ballots, Pinochijoe wouldn't have been close. How many counties did he win, fewer then Hildabeast right? We all know the scam that just took place.
I thought you were a female. sorry... anyways, y'all lost. move on. It was not even close.
I have moved on....a little less than before though with gas prices so high now.
LOLOL

You know you're a ******* nut, don't you?

Nationally, gas prices are up only 0.066¢ on average since a year ago...


LOL, the guy who needs to look at his avatar before calling someone a "******* nut," LOL.

Interesting self image you have there sport
Aww, poor guy. Thanks for letting me know you're bothered by my avatar. :itsok:

And yes, someone complaining about gas prices under Biden while ignoring gas prices under Trump, which were just 0.066¢ lower a year ago, is a ******* nut. Did that hit too close to home for you too?

:abgg2q.jpg:

Your avatar is hilarious. I love it. It clearly identifies you as the nut that you are. And that you pick Trump as your self selected self image is hilarious. It's funny as hell, angry fascist man
Regarding Kaz's Law, it's virtually a certainty that a wingnut can't finish three sentences without deploying the word leftist.

You don't like being identified as the leftist that you are? Hit a nerve there, huh? Why exactly would it bother you to be called a leftist when you endlessly advocate leftist ideology?
I wasn't commenting on what I don't like to be called but on the weakness in your habit of invoking the boogeyman.

BOO!

Then why can't you debate any of my points rather than objecting to a word I used correctly, fascist?
You don't make points, you just rattle on about boogeymen and generalizations.

Try offering a proposition followed by evidence and than draw a conclusion. Here's a tip for you, avoid name-calling, and keep adjectives to a minimum. You might be surprised.

The guy calling anyone who isn't a Democrat having a "Trump crush" is whining about "generalizations" again, LOL. Funny stuff.

That' while the number of Democrats fighting Democrat fascism is actually zero
What's funny is that you are inferring an absolute, a logical fallacy.

So now we have two. First you got all hot and bothered I called you a leftist, you ignored my question how you're not. Now you're all hot and bothered defending that Democrats aren't fascist, but you can't show any Democrat who has opposed violence, firing and other Democrat party fascism to destroy their opposition
I'm 75, I don't get hot and bothered much anymore. But keep trying, Trump's failed court cases convinced morons that there was an election theft.

John Lewis opposed non-violence so I just proved you wrong that I couldn't name any. Perhaps you now appreciate why I harp about the fallacious use of absolutes. You lose.

You're just blathering. There was election fraud. Democrats removed vote counting ability all going into the election. They didn't do that to not cheat. But even if there wasn't, this used to be a free country to state our opinion. That Trump stating his opinion is illegal is why you are now just a fascist party. Calling for violence means DIRECTLY CALLING FOR VIOLENCE. Or it used to until the fascist Democrats started attacking and destroying your opposition as you delve deeper and deeper into fascism.

Note you're silent to the flagrant hypocrisy that Democrats stoked hatred all summer in people who went out and murdered people and you're silent about it, leftist fascist
There's always election fraud, but it is not exclusively from one side of the aisle.

More importantly, there has been no evidence presented to even hint at WIDESPREAD fraud.

If we are to have any meaningful conversation, you need to quit generalizing about who I am. I have no cotton to violence perpetrated by anyone, be they antifa or WS groups. Neither do I dismiss black anger over the cold-blooded murder of George Floyd.

My profession has me intimately familiar with the difficulty of getting inside of someone's head and proving the likes of fraud. Hence, I appreciate your complaint about calling for violence. The Dems made the wrong charge. They should have confined themselves to the disgraceful way he dragged his feet in reacting to the riot. Had he been a soldier in time of war, and so abandoned his duty and post, he would have been stood before a firing squad and shot.

Democrats cheated systematically in the open and stole the election. They directly removed monitors and any ability to verify voters and stole the election. To say some Republican cheated somewhere and so it's the same is more of your stupid crap
If you have evidence of widespread fraud, show it. Trump had none which is why he was tossed from court more than five dozen times ... including by judges who he appointed.

But, he made enough noise with his bull to con people like you. Open your eyes, you've been had.

I already gave you two examples and you ignored them
You gave me nothing.
Let's have a link to something specific.

You were blathering on you wanted support for something you apparently couldn't identify.

Let me know when you figure out the subject
Election fraud.

I'm asking you for a link to something that establishes that there was widespread fraud.

What do you have?

You need a link to my first two examples that Democrats moved election monitors away from the counters and Democrats eliminated barriers to linking votes to legal voters? Seriously? Where were you during the election? Were you out of the country, stoned off your ass or in a Democrat party cult?
That was adjudicated and the court ruled monitors should be allowed up to 6 feet away. Next whine.
 
What a waste of time and money.
Not true. Wasn't 100 per cent exonerated. Unless I missed something - you mean all 100 Senators exonerated him? I though the majority found him guilty??
Well impeach him again.....and again......does that make you goofballs happy? Especially when your own party has a mass murderer loose in New York that SHOULD be impeached.
he isnt President anymore, so cannot Impeach him anymore :(
He wasn't president when you impeached him last time.....are you having a hard time keeping up through all your whining???
LOLOL

You cons are simply crazy. He was impeached on 1.13.21 and he was president until 1.20.21. You're so insane, you must think the latter date came before the former. :cuckoo:
 
What a waste of time and money.
Not true. Wasn't 100 per cent exonerated. Unless I missed something - you mean all 100 Senators exonerated him? I though the majority found him guilty??
Well impeach him again.....and again......does that make you goofballs happy? Especially when your own party has a mass murderer loose in New York that SHOULD be impeached.
he isnt President anymore, so cannot Impeach him anymore :(
He wasn't president when you impeached him last time.....are you having a hard time keeping up through all your whining???
he wasn't President January 11th when they impeached him?

Yes, Democrats had the power to impeach him on January 11. The trial however was after he was out of office when it was already over.

Note the Constitution says "removal from office." How do you remove someone from office who isn't in office?
You don't. But you can still convict and disqualify from holding office again.
 
Its so deliciously snowflake to seek retribution and try to remove someone from office who is No Longer IN office.
 
Its so deliciously snowflake to seek retribution and try to remove someone from office who is No Longer IN office.
You sound crazy too. :cuckoo:

Who was trying to remove Trump from office since he left office?
 
100% not guilty. Twice. That’s 200% Innocent
There is no higher level of acquittal than that
Really galling to lib loons as we see they have now switched to reeking havoc on Trump “forever into the future” Gotta be reall tough to live in a perpetual state of unsatisfied feelings.
 
15th post
100% not guilty. Twice. That’s 200% Innocent
There is no higher level of acquittal than that
Really galling to lib loons as we see they have now switched to reeking havoc on Trump “forever into the future” Gotta be reall tough to live in a perpetual state of unsatisfied feelings.
Why not answer the question ... ?

Who was trying to remove Trump from office since he left office?
 
Spittle flinging faun girlguy at it again. The dear snowflake cannot handle all the facts overwhelming his/her/it fake feelings.
 
Spittle flinging faun girlguy at it again. The dear snowflake cannot handle all the facts overwhelming his/her/it fake feelings.
LOL

You posted, "its so deliciously snowflake to seek retribution and try to remove someone from office who is No Longer IN office."

So who was trying to remove Trump from office since he left office?

If you can't say, it only proves I was right when I said you sound crazy. :cuckoo:
 
He was proven innocent

Oh boy, a horse-beater. And beater. And beater.

Once again, in unison------ "Don Trump was not proven innocent."

THAT is not what a political Impeachment and Trial does. You are thinking of a criminal trial by jury.

Don Trump was politically acquitted of the charge of inciting an insurrection (or words close to that.)

If the poster wants to say "innocent" in this context, then OJ Simpson was innocent. The thing both of those 'trials' have in common is the reality of jury-nullification.

What a dishonest hypocrite you are
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom