Trump Delegate Says Current U.S. Leaders May Need To Be 'Killed'

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2011
181,576
124,622
2,645
Native America
A Patriot Movement supporter, approved by the Trump campaign, talks of violently overthrowing the federal government.

Last December, Donald Trump's presidential campaign approved David Riden to be a delegate candidate on the Tennessee ballot, and when the state held its primary in March, voters selected Riden to go to the Republican National Convention. When Riden represents Trump there in July, it will not be his first time as a delegate to a political gathering. Seven years ago in Illinois he attended the so-called "Continental Congress of 2009," where he and other delegates put forth "Articles of Freedom" that called for abolishing all federal firearms laws, replacing the Department of Homeland Security with citizen militias, and, if necessary, launching an insurrection against the federal government.

Riden explains that his views today go even further than those of the Continental Congress of 2009—his involvement in which he says he explicitly disclosed to the Trump campaign when he applied to be a delegate. Riden told Mother Jones in an interview that US leaders who violate the Constitution may have to be done away with: "The polite word is 'eliminated,'" he said. "The harsh word is 'killed.'"

Riden said he keeps in contact with a militia group based in Tennessee, though he is not a militia member himself. He said all three branches of the US government are "way off away from the Constitution right now." Americans may need to attack with assault weapons and bombs in the nation's capital and elsewhere, he said:

There's only one reason why the Founding Fathers put the Second Amendment…If the federal government were to follow the path of all other governments, at some point it will turn to tyranny against the people. And at that point, when it stops to uphold and abide by the Constitution—and we're talking about the Supreme Court, Congress, and the executive branch, all three are way off away from the Constitution right now—the people have the right to assemble, bear arms, go to Washington, DC, or wherever necessary, and go into military battle against the government and replace those in government with individuals that will uphold the Constitution. The Constitution should remain, but the people that are abusing it should be, the polite word is, eliminated. The harsh word is killed. And they're killed by American citizens with weapons. And if people have tanks, assault weapons, if they have bombs—they need to have the weaponry necessary to be able to overthrow the federal government.​

Riden, a retired nuclear engineer, is one among an unknown number of Trump supporters with ties to the Patriot Movement, a loose-knit array of right-wing militias, nativists, and so-called "sovereign citizen" groups. These groups have swelled during the Barack Obama presidency. According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, nearly 1,000 anti-government groups now operate in the United States, including as many as 276 armed militias, which have increased more than sixfold in number since Obama was elected in 2008.

Federal agents who raided a Trump delegate's gated compound in Maryland said they found a subterranean bunker stocked with grenades, tear gas, and illegal machine guns.

The Trump campaign did not respond to requests for comment.

More: Trump delegate says current US leaders may need to be "killed"

OMG, is this really the kind of people right-wingers want running our government? Scary...
 
You know, he's not wrong. If the government continues to expand and go against the constitution, the people responsible would need to be eliminated~
 
The obsession continues...

Obsession? Yes, if you mean I don't want terrorists running out government.
You're a little late to worry about that, aren't you? How do you think Native Americans viewed the US government 150 years ago?

Are you suggesting we haven't evolved since then?
Not when we have the US Attorney General trying to find a way to legally prosecute people for expressing opinions.
 
The obsession continues...

Obsession? Yes, if you mean I don't want terrorists running out government.
You're a little late to worry about that, aren't you? How do you think Native Americans viewed the US government 150 years ago?

Are you suggesting we haven't evolved since then?
Not when we have the US Attorney General trying to find a way to legally prosecute people for expressing opinions.

They didn't prosecute Ted Nugent. So, what's your point?
 
The obsession continues...

Obsession? Yes, if you mean I don't want terrorists running out government.
You're a little late to worry about that, aren't you? How do you think Native Americans viewed the US government 150 years ago?

Are you suggesting we haven't evolved since then?
Not when we have the US Attorney General trying to find a way to legally prosecute people for expressing opinions.

They didn't prosecute Ted Nugent. So, what's your point?
Odd they didn't. .
 
The obsession continues...

Obsession? Yes, if you mean I don't want terrorists running out government.
You're a little late to worry about that, aren't you? How do you think Native Americans viewed the US government 150 years ago?

Are you suggesting we haven't evolved since then?
Not when we have the US Attorney General trying to find a way to legally prosecute people for expressing opinions.

They didn't prosecute Ted Nugent. So, what's your point?
That we already have authoritarians in government who are actively seeking to terrorize and silence opponents, and you're acting like Trump's rhetoric is something new and horrifying. Let me guess, you'll complain ONLY about inflammatory rhetoric coming from Trump, no one else, and not even about their actions.
 

Forum List

Back
Top