Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Banned my friend. According to him that is all he said. Maybe he did so more strongly. IDK.That isn't hate speech. They don't ban people for that.Me stating that Israel has the right to exist is only hate speech in your messed up Leftist world.Considering I've been trying unsuccessfully for years to explain that to conservitards it's pretty funny to have it quoted back at me.Opinions aren't lies. You're a dick. A complete Leftist dick.But that isn't what the tRumplings want. They want to be able to post lies without having them called lies.Just admit it’s a free for all and nobody is responsible for any written content .They should not suspend anyone if they are like Verizon or Xfinity as they claim. If they aren't then they should do as they wish but should be regulated differently. If everyone on USMB agreed with me I would never be on this board. Debates are important. You keep putting words in my mouth that aren't true. You're an asshole. If I did that on Twitter, would I be suspended? IDK. I won't be here.I just don't believe sites should suspend people arbitrarily.He said it wasn't vulgarity. It was him taking a pro Israel stance. I didn't delve deeply into it as I think Twitter is stupid. Only social media I use is LinkedIn.Even if it’s not doesn’t mean you ban the person. I have No idea what he posted. Is Twitter not an opinion forum?It's likely that the data he was posting wasn't "factual" if he was banned.That is not remotely what the OP says. What fantasy world do you live it? It has nothing to do with Trump. My friend was banned from Twitter for being pro Israel and posting factual pro Israel data. Puzzling to him as he said Twitter didn’t mind seeing anti Israel and pro Palestine posts. This to me is fine but then Twitter needs to be registered as a content provider vs content disseminator. Cannot have it both ways.So Trump is upset that more people on social media dislike him than those that like him. How is that going to work? Is he going to force people that don't like him to write nice things about him? Who is going to decide which people are forced to write nice things about him to make it all even? Wouldn't it be easier for him to just stop doing such stupid things so more people would like him?
You have no idea what he posted, yet you say it was unfair to ban him. You don't think that is just a little bit nuts?
You only hear his side of the story, and don't bother to delve into it to see what Twitter had to say about it. That same type reasoning would have you believing every person in prison is totally innocent as well.
You just don't believe sites should suspend people that agree with you politically.
Seems simple.
But it is correct. Opinions are. It lies, and if all these folks were doing is stating opinions that would be fine, but that's. It what most of them are doing. Facebook is removing verifiably false information and hate speech. Same with twitter and all the rest.
That's all.
You can still post your opinion all you want.
Have you ever seen me post hate speech here? I voted for Trump. We aren't all the same.
Not irrelevant at all! Every time Twitter or some big authoritarian tech giant shuts out conservative voicesThis is pretty weak. Twitter is not considered the speaker of content published on their platform. That’s the law. Whether they delete something or not is irrelevant.
Once. Many years ago when I was a kid. My parents go frequently. They say its safe. I disagree.Have you ever been over there?Who is oppressing them sans Fatah and Hamas? I never lose ground. 50+ Muslim nations. One Jewish nation. Safest place for a Muslim woman or a gay man.....the one Jewish nation. Imagine thatI was talking about your statement that "no one is oppressing them" them presumably being the Palestinians.If it were the minority then Israel would no longer exist. You are a dick, I knew it.And that is your opinion, and a minority one at that.I am not going to go off topic here but no it is not hate speech and no one is oppressing them. LOL.And there's the problem. You think advocating for the oppression of hundreds of thousands of people is not hate speech.Since Palestine doesn't exist, I don't see how it can be. To me, it would not be but to Twitter it may be. They don't ban those that say Israel should be wiped off the face of the Earth. To me both should be allowed as it is a public opinion forum.Would saying that Palestine needs to be wiped off the map be hate speech?Me stating that Israel has the right to exist is only hate speech in your messed up Leftist world.Considering I've been trying unsuccessfully for years to explain that to conservitards it's pretty funny to have it quoted back at me.Opinions aren't lies. You're a dick. A complete Leftist dick.But that isn't what the tRumplings want. They want to be able to post lies without having them called lies.Just admit it’s a free for all and nobody is responsible for any written content .They should not suspend anyone if they are like Verizon or Xfinity as they claim. If they aren't then they should do as they wish but should be regulated differently. If everyone on USMB agreed with me I would never be on this board. Debates are important. You keep putting words in my mouth that aren't true. You're an asshole. If I did that on Twitter, would I be suspended? IDK. I won't be here.I just don't believe sites should suspend people arbitrarily.He said it wasn't vulgarity. It was him taking a pro Israel stance. I didn't delve deeply into it as I think Twitter is stupid. Only social media I use is LinkedIn.Even if it’s not doesn’t mean you ban the person. I have No idea what he posted. Is Twitter not an opinion forum?It's likely that the data he was posting wasn't "factual" if he was banned.That is not remotely what the OP says. What fantasy world do you live it? It has nothing to do with Trump. My friend was banned from Twitter for being pro Israel and posting factual pro Israel data. Puzzling to him as he said Twitter didn’t mind seeing anti Israel and pro Palestine posts. This to me is fine but then Twitter needs to be registered as a content provider vs content disseminator. Cannot have it both ways.So Trump is upset that more people on social media dislike him than those that like him. How is that going to work? Is he going to force people that don't like him to write nice things about him? Who is going to decide which people are forced to write nice things about him to make it all even? Wouldn't it be easier for him to just stop doing such stupid things so more people would like him?
You have no idea what he posted, yet you say it was unfair to ban him. You don't think that is just a little bit nuts?
You only hear his side of the story, and don't bother to delve into it to see what Twitter had to say about it. That same type reasoning would have you believing every person in prison is totally innocent as well.
You just don't believe sites should suspend people that agree with you politically.
Seems simple.
But it is correct. Opinions are. It lies, and if all these folks were doing is stating opinions that would be fine, but that's. It what most of them are doing. Facebook is removing verifiably false information and hate speech. Same with twitter and all the rest.
That's all.
You can still post your opinion all you want.
Everyone else knows it is.
But it wasn't hate speech, nor was it a lie.
It is definitely a minority opinion that nobody is oppressing them.
Nice retreat into name-calling BTW.
That's a sure sign you know you're losing ground.
Tell your conservative voices not to lie or use hate speech. Then they won't get "shut down".Not irrelevant at all! Every time Twitter or some big authoritarian tech giant shuts out conservative voicesThis is pretty weak. Twitter is not considered the speaker of content published on their platform. That’s the law. Whether they delete something or not is irrelevant.
and lets some leftist voice speak instead they are expressing a preference and their opinion.
Twitter depends entirely on the posts of others and that means they produce virtually no content of their
own and supposedly have a duty to express all points of view.
My vote was meaningless. We have an Electoral College in the US. I may vote for whomever I choose and the same goes for you.Banned my friend. According to him that is all he said. Maybe he did so more strongly. IDK.That isn't hate speech. They don't ban people for that.Me stating that Israel has the right to exist is only hate speech in your messed up Leftist world.Considering I've been trying unsuccessfully for years to explain that to conservitards it's pretty funny to have it quoted back at me.Opinions aren't lies. You're a dick. A complete Leftist dick.But that isn't what the tRumplings want. They want to be able to post lies without having them called lies.Just admit it’s a free for all and nobody is responsible for any written content .They should not suspend anyone if they are like Verizon or Xfinity as they claim. If they aren't then they should do as they wish but should be regulated differently. If everyone on USMB agreed with me I would never be on this board. Debates are important. You keep putting words in my mouth that aren't true. You're an asshole. If I did that on Twitter, would I be suspended? IDK. I won't be here.I just don't believe sites should suspend people arbitrarily.He said it wasn't vulgarity. It was him taking a pro Israel stance. I didn't delve deeply into it as I think Twitter is stupid. Only social media I use is LinkedIn.Even if it’s not doesn’t mean you ban the person. I have No idea what he posted. Is Twitter not an opinion forum?It's likely that the data he was posting wasn't "factual" if he was banned.That is not remotely what the OP says. What fantasy world do you live it? It has nothing to do with Trump. My friend was banned from Twitter for being pro Israel and posting factual pro Israel data. Puzzling to him as he said Twitter didn’t mind seeing anti Israel and pro Palestine posts. This to me is fine but then Twitter needs to be registered as a content provider vs content disseminator. Cannot have it both ways.So Trump is upset that more people on social media dislike him than those that like him. How is that going to work? Is he going to force people that don't like him to write nice things about him? Who is going to decide which people are forced to write nice things about him to make it all even? Wouldn't it be easier for him to just stop doing such stupid things so more people would like him?
You have no idea what he posted, yet you say it was unfair to ban him. You don't think that is just a little bit nuts?
You only hear his side of the story, and don't bother to delve into it to see what Twitter had to say about it. That same type reasoning would have you believing every person in prison is totally innocent as well.
You just don't believe sites should suspend people that agree with you politically.
Seems simple.
But it is correct. Opinions are. It lies, and if all these folks were doing is stating opinions that would be fine, but that's. It what most of them are doing. Facebook is removing verifiably false information and hate speech. Same with twitter and all the rest.
That's all.
You can still post your opinion all you want.
Have you ever seen me post hate speech here? I voted for Trump. We aren't all the same.
If you voted for trump. then by definition you support him and all the crazy conspiracy theories he believes. Without your vote, and so many more just like you, he couldn't foist all that crazy crap on the country.
They have seen it my way. You’re asking for the impossible for reasons that you can’t even define.Yet they somehow figure it out...algorithms, people bitching, etc. I want legal experts to opine. Why are you against legal experts opining on this? In the end they could see it your way.Since Palestine doesn't exist, I don't see how it can be. To me, it would not be but to Twitter it may be. They don't ban those that say Israel should be wiped off the face of the Earth. To me both should be allowed as it is a public opinion forum.Would saying that Palestine needs to be wiped off the map be hate speech?Me stating that Israel has the right to exist is only hate speech in your messed up Leftist world.Considering I've been trying unsuccessfully for years to explain that to conservitards it's pretty funny to have it quoted back at me.Opinions aren't lies. You're a dick. A complete Leftist dick.But that isn't what the tRumplings want. They want to be able to post lies without having them called lies.Just admit it’s a free for all and nobody is responsible for any written content .They should not suspend anyone if they are like Verizon or Xfinity as they claim. If they aren't then they should do as they wish but should be regulated differently. If everyone on USMB agreed with me I would never be on this board. Debates are important. You keep putting words in my mouth that aren't true. You're an asshole. If I did that on Twitter, would I be suspended? IDK. I won't be here.I just don't believe sites should suspend people arbitrarily.He said it wasn't vulgarity. It was him taking a pro Israel stance. I didn't delve deeply into it as I think Twitter is stupid. Only social media I use is LinkedIn.Even if it’s not doesn’t mean you ban the person. I have No idea what he posted. Is Twitter not an opinion forum?It's likely that the data he was posting wasn't "factual" if he was banned.That is not remotely what the OP says. What fantasy world do you live it? It has nothing to do with Trump. My friend was banned from Twitter for being pro Israel and posting factual pro Israel data. Puzzling to him as he said Twitter didn’t mind seeing anti Israel and pro Palestine posts. This to me is fine but then Twitter needs to be registered as a content provider vs content disseminator. Cannot have it both ways.So Trump is upset that more people on social media dislike him than those that like him. How is that going to work? Is he going to force people that don't like him to write nice things about him? Who is going to decide which people are forced to write nice things about him to make it all even? Wouldn't it be easier for him to just stop doing such stupid things so more people would like him?
You have no idea what he posted, yet you say it was unfair to ban him. You don't think that is just a little bit nuts?
You only hear his side of the story, and don't bother to delve into it to see what Twitter had to say about it. That same type reasoning would have you believing every person in prison is totally innocent as well.
You just don't believe sites should suspend people that agree with you politically.
Seems simple.
But it is correct. Opinions are. It lies, and if all these folks were doing is stating opinions that would be fine, but that's. It what most of them are doing. Facebook is removing verifiably false information and hate speech. Same with twitter and all the rest.
That's all.
You can still post your opinion all you want.
Twitter does try to stop hate speech including anti-Semitism but they can’t possibly police every single tweet. There’s just far too many. It’s impossible.
It’s a private platform. Moreover, their revenue comes from advertisers. They need the flexibility to delete things on their platform that would affect their profitability.
It's perfectly safe unless you happen to look like a Palestinian.Once. Many years ago when I was a kid. My parents go frequently. They say its safe. I disagree.Have you ever been over there?Who is oppressing them sans Fatah and Hamas? I never lose ground. 50+ Muslim nations. One Jewish nation. Safest place for a Muslim woman or a gay man.....the one Jewish nation. Imagine thatI was talking about your statement that "no one is oppressing them" them presumably being the Palestinians.If it were the minority then Israel would no longer exist. You are a dick, I knew it.And that is your opinion, and a minority one at that.I am not going to go off topic here but no it is not hate speech and no one is oppressing them. LOL.And there's the problem. You think advocating for the oppression of hundreds of thousands of people is not hate speech.Since Palestine doesn't exist, I don't see how it can be. To me, it would not be but to Twitter it may be. They don't ban those that say Israel should be wiped off the face of the Earth. To me both should be allowed as it is a public opinion forum.Would saying that Palestine needs to be wiped off the map be hate speech?Me stating that Israel has the right to exist is only hate speech in your messed up Leftist world.Considering I've been trying unsuccessfully for years to explain that to conservitards it's pretty funny to have it quoted back at me.Opinions aren't lies. You're a dick. A complete Leftist dick.But that isn't what the tRumplings want. They want to be able to post lies without having them called lies.Just admit it’s a free for all and nobody is responsible for any written content .They should not suspend anyone if they are like Verizon or Xfinity as they claim. If they aren't then they should do as they wish but should be regulated differently. If everyone on USMB agreed with me I would never be on this board. Debates are important. You keep putting words in my mouth that aren't true. You're an asshole. If I did that on Twitter, would I be suspended? IDK. I won't be here.I just don't believe sites should suspend people arbitrarily.He said it wasn't vulgarity. It was him taking a pro Israel stance. I didn't delve deeply into it as I think Twitter is stupid. Only social media I use is LinkedIn.Even if it’s not doesn’t mean you ban the person. I have No idea what he posted. Is Twitter not an opinion forum?It's likely that the data he was posting wasn't "factual" if he was banned.That is not remotely what the OP says. What fantasy world do you live it? It has nothing to do with Trump. My friend was banned from Twitter for being pro Israel and posting factual pro Israel data. Puzzling to him as he said Twitter didn’t mind seeing anti Israel and pro Palestine posts. This to me is fine but then Twitter needs to be registered as a content provider vs content disseminator. Cannot have it both ways.So Trump is upset that more people on social media dislike him than those that like him. How is that going to work? Is he going to force people that don't like him to write nice things about him? Who is going to decide which people are forced to write nice things about him to make it all even? Wouldn't it be easier for him to just stop doing such stupid things so more people would like him?
You have no idea what he posted, yet you say it was unfair to ban him. You don't think that is just a little bit nuts?
You only hear his side of the story, and don't bother to delve into it to see what Twitter had to say about it. That same type reasoning would have you believing every person in prison is totally innocent as well.
You just don't believe sites should suspend people that agree with you politically.
Seems simple.
But it is correct. Opinions are. It lies, and if all these folks were doing is stating opinions that would be fine, but that's. It what most of them are doing. Facebook is removing verifiably false information and hate speech. Same with twitter and all the rest.
That's all.
You can still post your opinion all you want.
Everyone else knows it is.
But it wasn't hate speech, nor was it a lie.
It is definitely a minority opinion that nobody is oppressing them.
Nice retreat into name-calling BTW.
That's a sure sign you know you're losing ground.
They have not. I disagree. Maybe there is something in between but Twitter is nothing like Verizon or AT&T as they claim.They have seen it my way. You’re asking for the impossible for reasons that you can’t even define.Yet they somehow figure it out...algorithms, people bitching, etc. I want legal experts to opine. Why are you against legal experts opining on this? In the end they could see it your way.Since Palestine doesn't exist, I don't see how it can be. To me, it would not be but to Twitter it may be. They don't ban those that say Israel should be wiped off the face of the Earth. To me both should be allowed as it is a public opinion forum.Would saying that Palestine needs to be wiped off the map be hate speech?Me stating that Israel has the right to exist is only hate speech in your messed up Leftist world.Considering I've been trying unsuccessfully for years to explain that to conservitards it's pretty funny to have it quoted back at me.Opinions aren't lies. You're a dick. A complete Leftist dick.But that isn't what the tRumplings want. They want to be able to post lies without having them called lies.Just admit it’s a free for all and nobody is responsible for any written content .They should not suspend anyone if they are like Verizon or Xfinity as they claim. If they aren't then they should do as they wish but should be regulated differently. If everyone on USMB agreed with me I would never be on this board. Debates are important. You keep putting words in my mouth that aren't true. You're an asshole. If I did that on Twitter, would I be suspended? IDK. I won't be here.I just don't believe sites should suspend people arbitrarily.He said it wasn't vulgarity. It was him taking a pro Israel stance. I didn't delve deeply into it as I think Twitter is stupid. Only social media I use is LinkedIn.Even if it’s not doesn’t mean you ban the person. I have No idea what he posted. Is Twitter not an opinion forum?It's likely that the data he was posting wasn't "factual" if he was banned.That is not remotely what the OP says. What fantasy world do you live it? It has nothing to do with Trump. My friend was banned from Twitter for being pro Israel and posting factual pro Israel data. Puzzling to him as he said Twitter didn’t mind seeing anti Israel and pro Palestine posts. This to me is fine but then Twitter needs to be registered as a content provider vs content disseminator. Cannot have it both ways.So Trump is upset that more people on social media dislike him than those that like him. How is that going to work? Is he going to force people that don't like him to write nice things about him? Who is going to decide which people are forced to write nice things about him to make it all even? Wouldn't it be easier for him to just stop doing such stupid things so more people would like him?
You have no idea what he posted, yet you say it was unfair to ban him. You don't think that is just a little bit nuts?
You only hear his side of the story, and don't bother to delve into it to see what Twitter had to say about it. That same type reasoning would have you believing every person in prison is totally innocent as well.
You just don't believe sites should suspend people that agree with you politically.
Seems simple.
But it is correct. Opinions are. It lies, and if all these folks were doing is stating opinions that would be fine, but that's. It what most of them are doing. Facebook is removing verifiably false information and hate speech. Same with twitter and all the rest.
That's all.
You can still post your opinion all you want.
Twitter does try to stop hate speech including anti-Semitism but they can’t possibly police every single tweet. There’s just far too many. It’s impossible.
It’s a private platform. Moreover, their revenue comes from advertisers. They need the flexibility to delete things on their platform that would affect their profitability.
Twitter has definitely not “figured it out”. They still struggle with it.
You’ve got it wrong. There is no duty for Twitter to do anything about “all points of view”. That just doesn’t exist.Not irrelevant at all! Every time Twitter or some big authoritarian tech giant shuts out conservative voicesThis is pretty weak. Twitter is not considered the speaker of content published on their platform. That’s the law. Whether they delete something or not is irrelevant.
and lets some leftist voice speak instead they are expressing a preference and their opinion.
Twitter depends entirely on the posts of others and that means they produce virtually no content of their
own and supposedly have a duty to express all points of view.
That's why Congress let them operate their monopoly....like all leftists they lie and then do what they
want to do anyway.
No such thing as a "Palestinian"...you mean an Arab? So you support a one state solution?It's perfectly safe unless you happen to look like a Palestinian.Once. Many years ago when I was a kid. My parents go frequently. They say its safe. I disagree.Have you ever been over there?Who is oppressing them sans Fatah and Hamas? I never lose ground. 50+ Muslim nations. One Jewish nation. Safest place for a Muslim woman or a gay man.....the one Jewish nation. Imagine thatI was talking about your statement that "no one is oppressing them" them presumably being the Palestinians.If it were the minority then Israel would no longer exist. You are a dick, I knew it.And that is your opinion, and a minority one at that.I am not going to go off topic here but no it is not hate speech and no one is oppressing them. LOL.And there's the problem. You think advocating for the oppression of hundreds of thousands of people is not hate speech.Since Palestine doesn't exist, I don't see how it can be. To me, it would not be but to Twitter it may be. They don't ban those that say Israel should be wiped off the face of the Earth. To me both should be allowed as it is a public opinion forum.Would saying that Palestine needs to be wiped off the map be hate speech?Me stating that Israel has the right to exist is only hate speech in your messed up Leftist world.Considering I've been trying unsuccessfully for years to explain that to conservitards it's pretty funny to have it quoted back at me.Opinions aren't lies. You're a dick. A complete Leftist dick.But that isn't what the tRumplings want. They want to be able to post lies without having them called lies.Just admit it’s a free for all and nobody is responsible for any written content .They should not suspend anyone if they are like Verizon or Xfinity as they claim. If they aren't then they should do as they wish but should be regulated differently. If everyone on USMB agreed with me I would never be on this board. Debates are important. You keep putting words in my mouth that aren't true. You're an asshole. If I did that on Twitter, would I be suspended? IDK. I won't be here.I just don't believe sites should suspend people arbitrarily.He said it wasn't vulgarity. It was him taking a pro Israel stance. I didn't delve deeply into it as I think Twitter is stupid. Only social media I use is LinkedIn.Even if it’s not doesn’t mean you ban the person. I have No idea what he posted. Is Twitter not an opinion forum?It's likely that the data he was posting wasn't "factual" if he was banned.That is not remotely what the OP says. What fantasy world do you live it? It has nothing to do with Trump. My friend was banned from Twitter for being pro Israel and posting factual pro Israel data. Puzzling to him as he said Twitter didn’t mind seeing anti Israel and pro Palestine posts. This to me is fine but then Twitter needs to be registered as a content provider vs content disseminator. Cannot have it both ways.So Trump is upset that more people on social media dislike him than those that like him. How is that going to work? Is he going to force people that don't like him to write nice things about him? Who is going to decide which people are forced to write nice things about him to make it all even? Wouldn't it be easier for him to just stop doing such stupid things so more people would like him?
You have no idea what he posted, yet you say it was unfair to ban him. You don't think that is just a little bit nuts?
You only hear his side of the story, and don't bother to delve into it to see what Twitter had to say about it. That same type reasoning would have you believing every person in prison is totally innocent as well.
You just don't believe sites should suspend people that agree with you politically.
Seems simple.
But it is correct. Opinions are. It lies, and if all these folks were doing is stating opinions that would be fine, but that's. It what most of them are doing. Facebook is removing verifiably false information and hate speech. Same with twitter and all the rest.
That's all.
You can still post your opinion all you want.
Everyone else knows it is.
But it wasn't hate speech, nor was it a lie.
It is definitely a minority opinion that nobody is oppressing them.
Nice retreat into name-calling BTW.
That's a sure sign you know you're losing ground.
I agree with that. My argument is that they are nothing like Verizon and AT&T as they DO control the narrative. They should be regulated as such.You’ve got it wrong. There is no duty for Twitter to do anything about “all points of view”. That just doesn’t exist.Not irrelevant at all! Every time Twitter or some big authoritarian tech giant shuts out conservative voicesThis is pretty weak. Twitter is not considered the speaker of content published on their platform. That’s the law. Whether they delete something or not is irrelevant.
and lets some leftist voice speak instead they are expressing a preference and their opinion.
Twitter depends entirely on the posts of others and that means they produce virtually no content of their
own and supposedly have a duty to express all points of view.
That's why Congress let them operate their monopoly....like all leftists they lie and then do what they
want to do anyway.
Facts don’t care about your feelings.They have not. I disagree. Maybe there is something in between but Twitter is nothing like Verizon or AT&T as they claim.They have seen it my way. You’re asking for the impossible for reasons that you can’t even define.Yet they somehow figure it out...algorithms, people bitching, etc. I want legal experts to opine. Why are you against legal experts opining on this? In the end they could see it your way.Since Palestine doesn't exist, I don't see how it can be. To me, it would not be but to Twitter it may be. They don't ban those that say Israel should be wiped off the face of the Earth. To me both should be allowed as it is a public opinion forum.Would saying that Palestine needs to be wiped off the map be hate speech?Me stating that Israel has the right to exist is only hate speech in your messed up Leftist world.Considering I've been trying unsuccessfully for years to explain that to conservitards it's pretty funny to have it quoted back at me.Opinions aren't lies. You're a dick. A complete Leftist dick.But that isn't what the tRumplings want. They want to be able to post lies without having them called lies.Just admit it’s a free for all and nobody is responsible for any written content .They should not suspend anyone if they are like Verizon or Xfinity as they claim. If they aren't then they should do as they wish but should be regulated differently. If everyone on USMB agreed with me I would never be on this board. Debates are important. You keep putting words in my mouth that aren't true. You're an asshole. If I did that on Twitter, would I be suspended? IDK. I won't be here.I just don't believe sites should suspend people arbitrarily.He said it wasn't vulgarity. It was him taking a pro Israel stance. I didn't delve deeply into it as I think Twitter is stupid. Only social media I use is LinkedIn.Even if it’s not doesn’t mean you ban the person. I have No idea what he posted. Is Twitter not an opinion forum?It's likely that the data he was posting wasn't "factual" if he was banned.That is not remotely what the OP says. What fantasy world do you live it? It has nothing to do with Trump. My friend was banned from Twitter for being pro Israel and posting factual pro Israel data. Puzzling to him as he said Twitter didn’t mind seeing anti Israel and pro Palestine posts. This to me is fine but then Twitter needs to be registered as a content provider vs content disseminator. Cannot have it both ways.So Trump is upset that more people on social media dislike him than those that like him. How is that going to work? Is he going to force people that don't like him to write nice things about him? Who is going to decide which people are forced to write nice things about him to make it all even? Wouldn't it be easier for him to just stop doing such stupid things so more people would like him?
You have no idea what he posted, yet you say it was unfair to ban him. You don't think that is just a little bit nuts?
You only hear his side of the story, and don't bother to delve into it to see what Twitter had to say about it. That same type reasoning would have you believing every person in prison is totally innocent as well.
You just don't believe sites should suspend people that agree with you politically.
Seems simple.
But it is correct. Opinions are. It lies, and if all these folks were doing is stating opinions that would be fine, but that's. It what most of them are doing. Facebook is removing verifiably false information and hate speech. Same with twitter and all the rest.
That's all.
You can still post your opinion all you want.
Twitter does try to stop hate speech including anti-Semitism but they can’t possibly police every single tweet. There’s just far too many. It’s impossible.
It’s a private platform. Moreover, their revenue comes from advertisers. They need the flexibility to delete things on their platform that would affect their profitability.
Twitter has definitely not “figured it out”. They still struggle with it.
Don't see Twitter on there.Facts don’t care about your feelings.They have not. I disagree. Maybe there is something in between but Twitter is nothing like Verizon or AT&T as they claim.They have seen it my way. You’re asking for the impossible for reasons that you can’t even define.Yet they somehow figure it out...algorithms, people bitching, etc. I want legal experts to opine. Why are you against legal experts opining on this? In the end they could see it your way.Since Palestine doesn't exist, I don't see how it can be. To me, it would not be but to Twitter it may be. They don't ban those that say Israel should be wiped off the face of the Earth. To me both should be allowed as it is a public opinion forum.Would saying that Palestine needs to be wiped off the map be hate speech?Me stating that Israel has the right to exist is only hate speech in your messed up Leftist world.Considering I've been trying unsuccessfully for years to explain that to conservitards it's pretty funny to have it quoted back at me.Opinions aren't lies. You're a dick. A complete Leftist dick.But that isn't what the tRumplings want. They want to be able to post lies without having them called lies.Just admit it’s a free for all and nobody is responsible for any written content .They should not suspend anyone if they are like Verizon or Xfinity as they claim. If they aren't then they should do as they wish but should be regulated differently. If everyone on USMB agreed with me I would never be on this board. Debates are important. You keep putting words in my mouth that aren't true. You're an asshole. If I did that on Twitter, would I be suspended? IDK. I won't be here.I just don't believe sites should suspend people arbitrarily.He said it wasn't vulgarity. It was him taking a pro Israel stance. I didn't delve deeply into it as I think Twitter is stupid. Only social media I use is LinkedIn.Even if it’s not doesn’t mean you ban the person. I have No idea what he posted. Is Twitter not an opinion forum?It's likely that the data he was posting wasn't "factual" if he was banned.That is not remotely what the OP says. What fantasy world do you live it? It has nothing to do with Trump. My friend was banned from Twitter for being pro Israel and posting factual pro Israel data. Puzzling to him as he said Twitter didn’t mind seeing anti Israel and pro Palestine posts. This to me is fine but then Twitter needs to be registered as a content provider vs content disseminator. Cannot have it both ways.So Trump is upset that more people on social media dislike him than those that like him. How is that going to work? Is he going to force people that don't like him to write nice things about him? Who is going to decide which people are forced to write nice things about him to make it all even? Wouldn't it be easier for him to just stop doing such stupid things so more people would like him?
You have no idea what he posted, yet you say it was unfair to ban him. You don't think that is just a little bit nuts?
You only hear his side of the story, and don't bother to delve into it to see what Twitter had to say about it. That same type reasoning would have you believing every person in prison is totally innocent as well.
You just don't believe sites should suspend people that agree with you politically.
Seems simple.
But it is correct. Opinions are. It lies, and if all these folks were doing is stating opinions that would be fine, but that's. It what most of them are doing. Facebook is removing verifiably false information and hate speech. Same with twitter and all the rest.
That's all.
You can still post your opinion all you want.
Twitter does try to stop hate speech including anti-Semitism but they can’t possibly police every single tweet. There’s just far too many. It’s impossible.
It’s a private platform. Moreover, their revenue comes from advertisers. They need the flexibility to delete things on their platform that would affect their profitability.
Twitter has definitely not “figured it out”. They still struggle with it.
CDA 230: Key Legal Cases
www.eff.org
It there is such a thing hung as a Palestinian. I've met hundreds of them.No such thing as a "Palestinian"...you mean an Arab? So you support a one state solution?It's perfectly safe unless you happen to look like a Palestinian.Once. Many years ago when I was a kid. My parents go frequently. They say its safe. I disagree.Have you ever been over there?Who is oppressing them sans Fatah and Hamas? I never lose ground. 50+ Muslim nations. One Jewish nation. Safest place for a Muslim woman or a gay man.....the one Jewish nation. Imagine thatI was talking about your statement that "no one is oppressing them" them presumably being the Palestinians.If it were the minority then Israel would no longer exist. You are a dick, I knew it.And that is your opinion, and a minority one at that.I am not going to go off topic here but no it is not hate speech and no one is oppressing them. LOL.And there's the problem. You think advocating for the oppression of hundreds of thousands of people is not hate speech.Since Palestine doesn't exist, I don't see how it can be. To me, it would not be but to Twitter it may be. They don't ban those that say Israel should be wiped off the face of the Earth. To me both should be allowed as it is a public opinion forum.Would saying that Palestine needs to be wiped off the map be hate speech?Me stating that Israel has the right to exist is only hate speech in your messed up Leftist world.Considering I've been trying unsuccessfully for years to explain that to conservitards it's pretty funny to have it quoted back at me.Opinions aren't lies. You're a dick. A complete Leftist dick.But that isn't what the tRumplings want. They want to be able to post lies without having them called lies.Just admit it’s a free for all and nobody is responsible for any written content .They should not suspend anyone if they are like Verizon or Xfinity as they claim. If they aren't then they should do as they wish but should be regulated differently. If everyone on USMB agreed with me I would never be on this board. Debates are important. You keep putting words in my mouth that aren't true. You're an asshole. If I did that on Twitter, would I be suspended? IDK. I won't be here.I just don't believe sites should suspend people arbitrarily.He said it wasn't vulgarity. It was him taking a pro Israel stance. I didn't delve deeply into it as I think Twitter is stupid. Only social media I use is LinkedIn.Even if it’s not doesn’t mean you ban the person. I have No idea what he posted. Is Twitter not an opinion forum?It's likely that the data he was posting wasn't "factual" if he was banned.That is not remotely what the OP says. What fantasy world do you live it? It has nothing to do with Trump. My friend was banned from Twitter for being pro Israel and posting factual pro Israel data. Puzzling to him as he said Twitter didn’t mind seeing anti Israel and pro Palestine posts. This to me is fine but then Twitter needs to be registered as a content provider vs content disseminator. Cannot have it both ways.So Trump is upset that more people on social media dislike him than those that like him. How is that going to work? Is he going to force people that don't like him to write nice things about him? Who is going to decide which people are forced to write nice things about him to make it all even? Wouldn't it be easier for him to just stop doing such stupid things so more people would like him?
You have no idea what he posted, yet you say it was unfair to ban him. You don't think that is just a little bit nuts?
You only hear his side of the story, and don't bother to delve into it to see what Twitter had to say about it. That same type reasoning would have you believing every person in prison is totally innocent as well.
You just don't believe sites should suspend people that agree with you politically.
Seems simple.
But it is correct. Opinions are. It lies, and if all these folks were doing is stating opinions that would be fine, but that's. It what most of them are doing. Facebook is removing verifiably false information and hate speech. Same with twitter and all the rest.
That's all.
You can still post your opinion all you want.
Everyone else knows it is.
But it wasn't hate speech, nor was it a lie.
It is definitely a minority opinion that nobody is oppressing them.
Nice retreat into name-calling BTW.
That's a sure sign you know you're losing ground.
So you haven't read the establishing post in this thread? Or have any qualms with the problem of censorship by corporate giants given access to public internet band-waves?You’ve got it wrong. There is no duty for Twitter to do anything about “all points of view”. That just doesn’t exist.
Nope. You have not. You met Arabs who live in a territory they call Palestine. They are Jordanians and Egyptians. Hundreds? LOL. Why?It there is such a thing hung as a Palestinian. I've met hundreds of them.No such thing as a "Palestinian"...you mean an Arab? So you support a one state solution?It's perfectly safe unless you happen to look like a Palestinian.Once. Many years ago when I was a kid. My parents go frequently. They say its safe. I disagree.Have you ever been over there?Who is oppressing them sans Fatah and Hamas? I never lose ground. 50+ Muslim nations. One Jewish nation. Safest place for a Muslim woman or a gay man.....the one Jewish nation. Imagine thatI was talking about your statement that "no one is oppressing them" them presumably being the Palestinians.If it were the minority then Israel would no longer exist. You are a dick, I knew it.And that is your opinion, and a minority one at that.I am not going to go off topic here but no it is not hate speech and no one is oppressing them. LOL.And there's the problem. You think advocating for the oppression of hundreds of thousands of people is not hate speech.Since Palestine doesn't exist, I don't see how it can be. To me, it would not be but to Twitter it may be. They don't ban those that say Israel should be wiped off the face of the Earth. To me both should be allowed as it is a public opinion forum.Would saying that Palestine needs to be wiped off the map be hate speech?Me stating that Israel has the right to exist is only hate speech in your messed up Leftist world.Considering I've been trying unsuccessfully for years to explain that to conservitards it's pretty funny to have it quoted back at me.Opinions aren't lies. You're a dick. A complete Leftist dick.But that isn't what the tRumplings want. They want to be able to post lies without having them called lies.Just admit it’s a free for all and nobody is responsible for any written content .They should not suspend anyone if they are like Verizon or Xfinity as they claim. If they aren't then they should do as they wish but should be regulated differently. If everyone on USMB agreed with me I would never be on this board. Debates are important. You keep putting words in my mouth that aren't true. You're an asshole. If I did that on Twitter, would I be suspended? IDK. I won't be here.I just don't believe sites should suspend people arbitrarily.He said it wasn't vulgarity. It was him taking a pro Israel stance. I didn't delve deeply into it as I think Twitter is stupid. Only social media I use is LinkedIn.Even if it’s not doesn’t mean you ban the person. I have No idea what he posted. Is Twitter not an opinion forum?It's likely that the data he was posting wasn't "factual" if he was banned.That is not remotely what the OP says. What fantasy world do you live it? It has nothing to do with Trump. My friend was banned from Twitter for being pro Israel and posting factual pro Israel data. Puzzling to him as he said Twitter didn’t mind seeing anti Israel and pro Palestine posts. This to me is fine but then Twitter needs to be registered as a content provider vs content disseminator. Cannot have it both ways.So Trump is upset that more people on social media dislike him than those that like him. How is that going to work? Is he going to force people that don't like him to write nice things about him? Who is going to decide which people are forced to write nice things about him to make it all even? Wouldn't it be easier for him to just stop doing such stupid things so more people would like him?
You have no idea what he posted, yet you say it was unfair to ban him. You don't think that is just a little bit nuts?
You only hear his side of the story, and don't bother to delve into it to see what Twitter had to say about it. That same type reasoning would have you believing every person in prison is totally innocent as well.
You just don't believe sites should suspend people that agree with you politically.
Seems simple.
But it is correct. Opinions are. It lies, and if all these folks were doing is stating opinions that would be fine, but that's. It what most of them are doing. Facebook is removing verifiably false information and hate speech. Same with twitter and all the rest.
That's all.
You can still post your opinion all you want.
Everyone else knows it is.
But it wasn't hate speech, nor was it a lie.
It is definitely a minority opinion that nobody is oppressing them.
Nice retreat into name-calling BTW.
That's a sure sign you know you're losing ground.
Public internet bandwaves? WTF are you talking about? Twitter isn’t a radio station. They don’t broadcast tweets.So you haven't read the establishing post in this thread? Or have any qualms with the problem of censorship by corporate giants given access to public internet band-waves?You’ve got it wrong. There is no duty for Twitter to do anything about “all points of view”. That just doesn’t exist.
Well we already know you are perfectly happy to let a few monopolistic corporations shut down fully half
of public discussion in this nation, as if you were Xi Jinping himself. How does it feel to be bending over for
Big Brother? Oh, right. You don't care for classic American values.
"the FCC classified the internet as a regulated utility under the 1934 Telecommunications Act."Public internet bandwaves? WTF are you talking about? Twitter isn’t a radio station. They don’t broadcast tweets.
Don't like white only lunch counters and schools? Don't use them then. That's how we do things inDon’t like twitter. Don’t use twitter. That’s the American way of solving a problem. Not by using the heavy hand of government.
The poor sensitive snowflakes.
Sad.
I wonder how much sensitive twitter will become if an Online Bill of Rights were passed. These social media companies fear that greatly, the question is, "why should they?"
