DHS has sent Google, Meta and other companies hundreds of subpoenas for information on accounts that track ICE

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

No that’s getting a court order for a company to provide information
Using social media to harm your enemies is having them censor individuals

That's not how it usually works though.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

They are going after their information for not supporting ICE.

Its going after political opponents.

It's also going after people for exercising their first amendment rights.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

No, not caring isn’t celebrating

Not sure why you would think that

He was a domestic terrrorist, nobody celebrated his death though. It’s sad and tragic.

Who was a domestic terrorist? If you're referring to Alex Pretti then you've just demonstrated why this is a bad idea.

 

[DonGlock26]

Really? And do you think that if they get the power & authority that you want them to have, that you may not be one of the people they or someone else with the same power & authority will go after? You don't mind these people whom have been caught lying about their activities again and again, rummaging around in your social media accounts?

Sorry, left wing terrorists do not get protection from subpoenas. Where were you when the FBI was spying on Trump and Catholic churches?

 

[struth]

That's not how it usually works though.

Really? How’s it usually done?

 

[struth]

Who was a domestic terrorist? If you're referring to Alex Pretti then you've just demonstrated why this is a bad idea.

How’s that demostrste it’s a bad idea?

 

[DonGlock26]

It's also going after people for exercising their first amendment rights.

Heavily redacted records show FBI's targeting of Catholics went beyond what it claimed: watchdog

A conservative government watchdog has released documents obtained via FOIA that it says show the FBI's targeting of Catholics was more widespread than it has acknowledged.

www.foxnews.com

 

[struth]

It's also going after people for exercising their first amendment rights.

It’s not going after anyone

People are free to exercise their first amendments right and the govt and for that matter any of us are free to listen to it and collect the information they make public

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Sorry, left wing terrorists do not get protection from subpoenas. Where were you when the FBI was spying on Trump and Catholic churches?

Wow, that's a really stupid statement.

Would you like it if I subpoenaed your records?

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

How’s that demostrste it’s a bad idea?

Well I don't know if you're calling Pretti a domestic terrorist because Kristi Noem said he was or because you believe that he was. But no matter which case, he doesn't meet the legal definition of a domestic terrorist.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Really? How’s it usually done?

Via warrant.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

It’s not going after anyone

People are free to exercise their first amendments right and the govt and for that matter any of us are free to listen to it and collect the information they make public

They don't need a subpoena for that - just like anything we post here is up for grabs for anyone who wants it.

They're not referring to things that are already in the public domain, they're talking about allegedly using a subpoena to access the information behind the accounts, simply because someone was not supportive of ICE or criticized them, according to the OP.

 

[DonGlock26]

Wow, that's a really stupid statement.

Would you like it if I subpoenaed your records?

Where were you when Obama and Biden’s minions spied on the Right for no cause???

 

[toobfreak]

"Homeland Security Wants Social Media Sites to Expose Anti-ICE Accounts
Time to roll up these left wing terror cells. Follow the money.

Hell, maybe DHS ought to do like Obumma and Biden and just show up with a warrent and seize their computer records. I bet these fcks put up a fight and resist turning over records or even try to destroy them.

 

[struth]

They don't need a subpoena for that - just like anything we post here is up for grabs for anyone who wants it.

They're not referring to things that are already in the public domain, they're talking about allegedly using a subpoena to access the information behind the accounts, simply because someone was not supportive of ICE or criticized them, according to the OP.

A sub makes it cleaner more over allows things that were deleted to be collected

 

[struth]

Via warrant.

A warrant would be necesssy to search something belong to a suspect


Not collect information from a third party, like facebooks or X or Snapchat

 

[struth]

Well I don't know if you're calling Pretti a domestic terrorist because Kristi Noem said he was or because you believe that he was. But no matter which case, he doesn't meet the legal definition of a domestic terrorist.

Sure he did

He used violence and threats of violence to coerce the govt in pursuit of his politic and ideological goals

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

A sub makes it cleaner more over allows things that were deleted to be collected

No, you would still need a search warrant, signed by a judge that specifies what specifically may be searched for.

An administrative subpoena cannot compel a provider to disclose:

• Direct messages
• Inbox messages
• Private group chats
• Non-public posts
• Photos stored privately
• Drafts
• ***Deleted communications stored by the provider

Those are “contents of communications” under § 2510(8) and require a search warrant supported by probable cause.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Sure he did

He used violence and threats of violence to coerce the govt in pursuit of his politic and ideological goals

Can you be specific? Like what he did specifically, when he did it, how he did it and in support of what specific politic AND ideological goals?

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Where were you when Obama and Biden’s minions spied on the Right for no cause???

There had to have been a stated cause, even if it was not a valid cause.

So what was the stated cause?