"behind every great fortune is a great crime" anatole franceso why's he a billionaire?
~S~
in case you missed the verdicts, the crime was "FRAUD. "
or perhaps the family business of prostitution and "human trafficking"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"behind every great fortune is a great crime" anatole franceso why's he a billionaire?
~S~
its the justice system thats the fraud Rampin case you missed the verdicts, the crime was "FRAUD. "
plenty of fraud to go around.its the justice system thats the fraud Ramp
~S~
See my new thread on the subject.so why's he a billionaire?
~S~
I'm well aware successful biz folks diversify Berg , some avenues work out better than others do.See my new thread on the subject.
Your Stalinist FAKE indictments and LAWFARE mean NOTHING!!!!!!So says trump, a 4 time indicted, convicted, criminal. How many inmates ever admit they're guilty?

Left wing lawfare isn't justice , nor should one admit any validity of them BergSo says trump, a 4 time indicted, convicted, criminal. How many inmates ever admit they're guilty?
easy big guyYour Stalinist FAKE indictments and LAWFARE mean NOTHING!!!!!!
GTFOH!!!!!![]()
The demented avenger subverted demoralized Stalinist Marxist Leninist zombie ASSHOLES need to be ERADICATED AND SCORNED TO HELL.....easy big guy
they got nothing but the usual partisan propaganda
laugh at 'em!
~S~
It's Trump who is a stalinist and a lawfare wager. Got it right for you.Your Stalinist FAKE indictments and LAWFARE mean NOTHING!!!!!!
GTFOH!!!!!![]()
Sure, and I'm an astronaut.It's Trump who is a stalinist and a lawfare wager. Got it right for you.
Nothing he has said or done indicates an intention to do so. He is making a point. He is being treated unfairly and would be justified in retaliating.
But in his last term, the people he appointed as AG had the balls to tell him, NO, when he wanted to do something untoward. He will do so again. He will appoint someone with integrity in the mold of Bill Barr, and that person will not pursue a political vendetta for the President.
/----/ He's made $6 billion with DJT.He'd be bankrupt if not for the money he made from that ridiculous reality TV show.
Uh, no he hasn't. It opened at $27 today./----/ He's made $6 billion with DJT.
Nothing he has said or done indicates an intention to do so. He is making a point. He is being treated unfairly and would be justified in retaliating.
But in his last term, the people he appointed as AG had the balls to tell him, NO, when he wanted to do something untoward. He will do so again. He will appoint someone with integrity in the mold of Bill Barr, and that person will not pursue a political vendetta for the President.
How pathetic you bleev this nonsense.What is good for the goose....‘I Would Have Every Right To Go After Them’
Surveying the news of the past 24 hours, we’re presented with a particularly sobering reflection of our current state of affairs. I will lay it out brick by brick in the items below, but first I want to circle back to Donald Trump’s appearance two nights ago on Sean Hannity’s Fox News program.
Hannity asked a leading question, clearly trying to throw Trump a softball that will let him deny his intention to use the office of the presidency to exact retribution against his political foes – even though Trump has spent many months now promising to do precisely that.
At first, Trump took the easy swing and suggested that he won’t perpetuate what he implies is a cycle of retribution he’s already been victimized by. But then he launched into an extended justification of doing exactly what he had just disclaimed and asserting that he has “every right to go after them”:
Trump Claims He Has Every Right To Prosecute His Enemies
This could be one of the better cons he's invented in a while. Setting up a win-win scenario by which should he be re-elected he can claim righteousness and excite the base for going after his proclaimed enemies, or get credit with the minions if he does not. Because if he goes after those who have held him accountable for his many crimes he'll say he's justified. If he doesn't he'll say he is showing great restraint. The Following will love him either way. This guy is a genius in a manipulative, malevolent kind of way.
Same thing with the hush money trial. Win or lose he set up a construct by which he was being unfairly treated by the system. Acquittal.......the charges were made up. Conviction.......the charges were made up. Amazingly, the rubes fell for it AGAIN.