Trump Claims He Has Every Right To Prosecute His Enemies

[BackAgain]

Because you haven’t refuted it.

Yes. I refuted it. Your denial is silly of you.

Consistent behavior would have consistent motivations. That’s logical.

No. It isn’t. It’s just one possibility. The only consistencies are: nothing criminal in paying for an NDA — and no valid evidence of intent to commit or conceal ANY crime.

You can’t refute the logic. You just stamp your feet.

I have refuted your invalid logic.

You petulantly keep repeating yourself (vacantly) all the same.

 

[Marener]

No. It isn’t. It’s just one possibility

It’s the most logical conclusion. When you combine numerous pieces of evidence like this, the jury eventually believes it beyond a reasonable doubt.

You never stated why it isnt logical. You just said there could be other possibilities. Sure, could be. What are they? You don’t say. Why would they be more logical? You don’t say.

Just deny deny deny.

 

[BackAgain]

It’s the most logical conclusion. When you combine numerous pieces of evidence like this, the jury eventually believes it beyond a reasonable doubt.

You never stated why it isnt logical. You just said there could be other possibilities. Sure, could be. What are they? You don’t say. Why would they be more logical? You don’t say.

Just deny deny deny.

Repeating your mantra is still unpersuasive, kid.

 

[Marener]

Repeating your mantra is still unpersuasive, kid.

You aren’t open minded enough to be persuaded. You accept the Trump dogma unquestioningly.

The jury was open minded.

 

[BackAgain]

You aren’t open minded enough to be persuaded. You accept the Trump dogma unquestioningly.

The jury was open minded.

Lol.

You might actually be stupid enough to believe that shit. But then, of course, you’ve always been a flaming retard.

 

[lennypartiv]

Well...elections have consequences.

 

[Marener]

Lol.

You might actually be stupid enough to believe that shit. But then, of course, you’ve always been a flaming retard.

The proof is your lack of argument. Trump’s expensive defense was likewise devoid of one.

 

[BackAgain]

The proof is your lack of argument. Trump’s expensive defense was likewise devoid of one.

Did anyone ever mention how dull you always are?

 

[Marener]

Did anyone ever mention how dull you always are?

I was thinking the same thinking the same thing. Your incessant replies of "no" don't give me anything to analyze.

 

[BackAgain]

I was thinking the same thinking the same thing. Your incessant replies of "no" don't give me anything to analyze.

The Department of Redundancy Department may have a job opening for you for you.

 

[surada]

Nothing he has said or done indicates an intention to do so. He is making a point. He is being treated unfairly and would be justified in retaliating.

But in his last term, the people he appointed as AG had the balls to tell him, NO, when he wanted to do something untoward. He will do so again. He will appoint someone with integrity in the mold of Bill Barr, and that person will not pursue a political vendetta for the President.

Poor Trump says he's been treated unfairly since 1980.

 

[1srelluc]

The fact that this thread has ran 22 pages is proof positive that the dems are runnin' skeered.....I say good, keep the skeer upon them.

The dems need to be weeded, root and stem, from every agency in our government or our Republic dies at their hand.

If that takes a hard man to do so (operating within bounds of current law) then that is perfectly fine with me.

There should be massive .gov RIFs on Day 1 and many cabinet positions eliminated.....Currently there are too many cooks in the kitchen and none are held responsible for anything.

 

[berg80]

Poor Trump says he's been treated unfairly since 1980.

He'd be bankrupt if not for the money he made from that ridiculous reality TV show.

 

[Billiejeens]

The fact that this thread has ran 22 pages is proof positive that the dems are runnin' skeered.....I say good, keep the skeer upon them.

The dems need to be weeded, root and stem, from every agency in our government or our Republic dies at their hand.

If that takes a hard man to do so (operating within bounds of current law) then that is perfectly fine with me.

There should be massive .gov RIFs on Day 1 and many cabinet positions eliminated.....Currently there are too many cooks in the kitchen and none are held responsible for anything.

Absolutely

 

[pknopp]

He'd be bankrupt if not for the money he made from that ridiculous reality TV show.

He would be a trash collector if not for his dad continual bailing him out.

 

[berg80]

He would be a trash collector if not for his dad continual bailing him out.

When Donald Trump signed a deal to star in The Apprentice in 2004, the New York Times’ latest bombshell report on his tax returns shows, he was among the worst businessmen in the United States.



Debate offers Trump chance to yank stubbornly stable 2020 race his way
Read more

Tax documents obtained by the paper show how Trump squandered a $413m inheritance in a series of losing plays in real estate and casinos. On his tax return in 2004, he declared $89.9m in net losses from core businesses the previous year.

The story of how The Apprentice made Trump a household name, burnishing his personal myth as a successful businessman and ultimately paving his way to the White House, is well documented. But on Tuesday, the Times exposed just how false that myth was, and how far into the red Trump had sunk when he was approached by Mark Burnett, a British-born reality TV producer known for the genre’s first mega-hit, Survivor.

The New York Times report also exploded the image of Trump as a businessman with a reality TV career on the side. Taken together, the documents “demonstrate that he was far more successful playing a business mogul than being one in real life”, the Times said.

Trump Claims He Has Every Right To Prosecute His Enemies

Because you haven’t refuted it. Yes. I refuted it. Your denial is silly of you. Consistent behavior would have consistent motivations. That’s logical. No. It isn’t. It’s just one possibility. The only consistencies are: nothing criminal in paying for an NDA — and no valid evidence of...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[sparky]

too many cooks in the kitchen

Obama stew?

~S~

 

[sparky]

he was among the worst businessmen in the United States.

so why's he a billionaire?

~S~

 

[pknopp]

so why's he a billionaire?

~S~

Jim Justice in WV claimed to be a billionaire also.

Justice got a default letter in the mail this spring. Then creditors came for his Greenbrier Hotel - WV MetroNews

 

[Billiejeens]

He would be a trash collector if not for his dad continual bailing him out.

Poor, poor pk