Trump cancels housing bill signing over Senate inaction on SAVE Act

[Independent thinker]

You’re taking about “The Elizabeth ‘Pocahontas’ Warren centric housing bill, which is of minor importance”?

LOL. Boy, you just can't accept the fact that I agreed with you on this one issue. Why don't you just like my post?

 

[Moonglow]

Both Democrats and Republicans overwhelmingly support this.

In the House: 358 voted yes, 32 voted no.
In the Senate: 85 voted yes, 5 voted no.

The man-baby is throwing a man-baby hissy-fit over something that both sides actually agree to be good for America. It’s pretty pathetic.

There are two items tucked in the bill that have nothing to do with identification for voting purposes, thus it is a dead bill.

 

[Zincwarrior]

There are two items tucked in the bill that have nothing to do with identification for voting purposes, thus it is a dead bill.

What two items are you referring to? I see several that need work.

 

[XponentialChaos]

OK. I have to admit, this seems quite pointless. I am against this decision by Trump.

Trump was in favor of and wanted a housing bill to lower costs for Americans. It was actually more or less his idea. There are a lot of good items in this bill and it was so overwhelmingly bipartisan that it seems about a 100% sure thing that they could override a Trump veto, which means Trump holds no cards on this issue, not even any cards he could bluff with. It would be different if it was not veto proof and Trump could use this decision to pressure Congress to pass the SAVE act but that is not the case. Pretty stupid I would have to agree because it guarantees a Trump loss on the subject. There is no way for him to win on this.

Wow. You know it’s a stupid decision from Trump when even you say it’s stupid of him.

 

[TimFitz]

If Obama makes people show an ID to get into his library, then you should show your ID to vote. You loons are always saying Trump is doing away with our democracy. Well over 80% of Americans want voter ID, so it's you loons doing away with our democracy.

Trying to derail the thread?

 

[Dekster]

Yes. There is some concern about a pocket veto. I do not know if they are staying in technical session.

I think that under the constitution it is an adjournment that is the measure and under the rules that doesn't happen unless the house and teh senate both pass a concurrent resolution if it is to last more than 3 days

 

[Clipper]

Democrats shut down the country twice for nothing

Stroker Don had to beat his meat because for once he had his ass handed back to him by his GOP party of asslickers & flunky's.

Just another shitshow at the hands of Donny Moonbeam.

 

[Independent thinker]

Wow. You know it’s a stupid decision from Trump when even you say it’s stupid of him.

There are several things I don’t like about Trump but I’m not infected with TDS.

 

[XponentialChaos]

There are several things I don’t like about Trump…

Such as…?

 

[Independent thinker]

Such as…?

Well, I don’t like his big mouth and calling people names to name a couple more but that is not the criteria I use when voting but, if it were, democrats are over the top with their calling people MAGA, racists, bigots, deplorables, misogynists, Nazis, white supremacists, and are fighting a war against women, the poor, seniors, minorities, etc. Come to think of it, maybe I do use that as one of my criteria.

 

[Moonglow]

If Obama makes people show an ID to get into his library, then you should show your ID to vote. You loons are always saying Trump is doing away with our democracy. Well over 80% of Americans want voter ID, so it's you loons doing away with our democracy.

I do, they scan the damn thing for my voter registration. Now get on with another biotch.

 

[Moonglow]

What two items are you referring to? I see several that need work.

The "no men in women's sports" argument will fail due to Title IX discrimination clauses.
No minor may have gender reassignment surgery. What do they do with intersex children when born?

 

[Zincwarrior]

The "no men in women's sports" argument will fail due to Title IX discrimination clauses.
No minor may have gender reassignment surgery. What do they do with intersex children when born?

Thats in the SAVE Act? Oh wait, sorry what legislation are you referring to?

 

[Moonglow]

Thats in the SAVE Act? Oh wait, sorry what legislation are you referring to?

They took it out. I refreshed my page.

 

[Winco]

If Obama makes people show an ID to get into his library, then you should show your ID to vote.

Of course this ^^^^ isn't true.

Do you have a link to support your false claim?

 

[jknowgood]

Trying to derail the thread?

How? You got to show an ID to function in society, why not to vote?

 

[jknowgood]

I do, they scan the damn thing for my voter registration. Now get on with another biotch.

As they should.

 

[Zincwarrior]

How? You got to show an ID to function in society, why not to vote?

I already do. Its a state issue remember?

 

[jknowgood]

Of course this ^^^^ isn't true.

Do you have a link to support your false claim?

Do you not pay attention, you loons are the most ignorant, no stupid people on the planet. You do ignorance, can be fixed?

 

[jknowgood]

I already do. Its a state issue remember?

In South Carolina it is, but California banned it.