Samofvt
Diamond Member
- Aug 9, 2021
- 1,134
- 1,114
- 1,938
And by that, it sounds like you don't speak American English as your first language (clue: it's a common term used for hundreds of years, auto-spell check corrections disregarded)And by "Scott (sic) free," you mean convicted...
Seriously? Only 120 across the USA convicted? At one point in 2020, just in my tiny, unheard-of, town, there were over a thousand rioting, many of them bussed in from inner cities: broken windows, graffiti, barricaded major streets, property damage, gun fire, and a general take-over of a major public space for several months. The first snowstorm finally drove them away, although there was talk of citizens taking action for ourselves, but cooler heads talked us into deferring to the law. Who, by the way, were defunded and now the city is crying for more help to curb the skyrocketing crime rates.Records rebut claims of unequal treatment of Jan. 6 rioters
Some people charged in the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol and their Republican allies claim the Justice Department is treating them harshly because of their political views.apnews.comThe AP found that more than 120 defendants across the United States have pleaded guilty or were convicted at trial of federal crimes including rioting, arson and conspiracy.
If your comparison said "12,000 convicted" I'd say that would be closer to proportional. But no, out of a few thousand people who got out of hand and went too far and caused some damage and hardship for one day, 727 people were charged (so far). Dis-proportionate treatment. Period.