- Apr 1, 2011
- 169,962
- 47,192
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #61
According to the most recent data available (2003–04), the two plants combined emit:
Like most coal-fired power plants in Illinois, because of their age, the Fisk and Crawford power plants are exempt from federal regulations that require modern pollution control devices. The Fisk plant was most recently rebuilt in 1958 and Crawford in 1959. The idea behind “grandfathering” the 1950s-era plants in the 1977 Federal Clean Air Act was that the dirty old plants were going to be replaced by more modern, cleaner plants in a matter of years. This was costly error in judgment we are still suffering through and fighting to correct.
- 230 lbs of mercury, which causes brain damage [1];
- 17,765 tons of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide, which cause ozone and acid rain, and become particulate matter that contributes to breathing problems such as asthma [2];
- 260,000 lbs of soot [3]
The current federal framework for reducing power-plant pollution nationwide, the so-called “cap and trade” program, allows heavy pollution to be concentrated in areas that are home to people who are most vulnerable to the ill health effects from it, areas with lower-income individuals and minorities who are disenfranchised from the political process and power structure. This is the core concept of environmental injustice.
In fact, according to a 2004 study by the League of United Latin American Citizens, 7 in 10 hispanics live in counties that violate air pollution standards.
Citations:
PERRO - Coal-Fired Power Plants in Chicago
And you continue to lie.
Note that I said "modern coal fired power plants." Plants built after 1977 all have scrubbers that remove that vast majority of the pollutants. Plants that are 60 years old are near the end of their serviceable lives. Obama's recently issued EPA regulations, on the other hand, are putting plants as young as 15 years old out of business.