postman
Diamond Member
- Feb 23, 2017
- 21,835
- 12,621
- 1,400
That there was no evidence of.One more time, there was massive obvious fraud.
According to the 60 judges and the USSC that heard the arguments.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That there was no evidence of.One more time, there was massive obvious fraud.
The decision not to proceed is exactly what I am talking about. You dumbass.FruitLoops, cases are filed with claims. Those claims include citations to support their claims. Those citations are the evidence they plan to present in court. That evidence, if there is any, is then presented to a judge, who will decide if there is reason to proceed to an evidentary hearing.
Can't you cite the evidence filed in even one single case??
I can, by the way. Seems you can't.
That's what judges and justices hand down.That is not a legal conclusion, it is an opinion.
News flash. No one believes our corrupt government.That there was no evidence of.
According to the 60 judges and the USSC that heard the arguments.
You wouldn't be saying that if it was your guy that was screwed....
You know that at least one judge ruled the "evidence" they tried to submit as evidence, wasn't worthy of submitting to a federal court. And she even sanctioned the lawyers for doing so.The decision not to proceed is exactly what I am talking about. You dumbass.
The decision not to proceed is exactly what I am talking about. You dumbass.
News flash. No one believes our corrupt government.
LOL
There were over 60 cases filed, rambtard. None of them specified any claims of fraud??
We have too much respect for our jury system than to waste their time with frivolous unfounded lawsuitsHas a jury of our peers ever heard any evidence?....
Its looks like your looking at yourself in the mirror. Denial is strongest when confronted with irrefutable facts. Trump lies. Learn to live with it..
Proving you'll buy any lie if it reinforces what you already believe.
Or have been paid to say.
.
One more time, there was massive obvious fraud.
I can cite that two states tried to decertify the election and were stopped by RINOs. That is fact. Do you think they did that because there was no evidence?LOLOL
Poor, deranged FruitLoops. And I'm trying to get you to cite a single case's evidence. That would be in the filing. Then I could show you why the case was tossed.
You can't cite even one single case. Shows you don't know what the fuck you're rambling about.
Forced to recycle old news ahead of the 2024 election.The Berkeley Research Group's findings were squashed because they did not align with Trump's election lies.
![]()
Firm Hired By Trump To Prove Election Fraud Came Up Empty: Report
The Berkeley Research Group's findings were squashed because they did not align with Trump's election lies.www.huffpost.com
A research firm investigated Donald Trump’s assertion that the presidential election was fraudulent, but its findings were suppressed because they found nothing to support his claims, The Washington Post reported citing four sources familiar with the matter.
The Berkeley Research Group, hired by the former president’s 2020 campaign, gathered a team of around a dozen people to look into alleged voter fraud and irregularities in six states, according to the Post.
The team reportedly briefed Trump, his former chief of staff Mark Meadows and others on a conference call held in the last days of 2020 — before Trump held a rally urging his supporters to march on the Capitol preceding the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection. The call reportedly became contentious.
But the researchers had looked at “everything,” one source told the Post.
“Literally anything you could think of. Voter turnout anomalies, date of birth anomalies, whether dead people voted. If there was anything under the sun that could be thought of, they looked at it,” the source said.
Not even a group hired by the Traitor and Cabal Mindless Minions found proof of Election Fraud....
Congress refusing to investigate the election only confirmed the fraud. The censorship and political persecution that came after proved it.This is his problem. His conclusion was massive fraud, because that's what he believes had to have happened.
And nobody can convince him the giants he saw were actually windmills.
I can cite that two states tried to decertify the election and were stopped by RINOs. That is fact. Do you think they did that because there was no evidence?
Trumpism in a nutshell.the Department of Justice can't be trusted ...voters can’t be trusted ... the poll workers can’t be trusted ... the voting machines can’t be trusted ... the canvasing boards can't be trusted ... the recounts can't be trusted ... the audits can't be trusted ... Democrats can't be trusted ... Republicans can't be trusted ... the media can’t be trusted ... the news can't be trusted ... Sydney Powell can't be trusted ... Lin Wood can't be trusted ... William Barr can’t be trusted ... Christopher Wray can't be trusted ... the guy who was in charge of election security can’t be trusted ... Georgia's Republican Secretary of State can't be trusted ... Gabriel Sterling, his Republican COO and Trump voter, can't be trusted ... the Republican-led Maricopa board of elections can't be trusted ... the Racine board of elections can't be trusted ... Mike Pence can't be trusted ... the pillow guy can't be trusted ... Cyber Ninja's can't be trusted ... the Arizona audit can't be trusted ... the Wisconsin audit can't be trusted ... the Wisconsin Attorney General can't be trusted ... state authorities can't be trusted ... the lower courts can’t be trusted ... the appellate courts can’t be trusted ... the Supreme Court can’t be trusted ... the United States Congress can't be trusted ...But Donald Trump can be trusted.
Congress refusing to investigate the election only confirmed the fraud. The censorship and political persecution that came after proved it.
Which of those were filed in court...?
![]()