Trump bombs Iran

[j-mac]

LOL..It is you folks who voted for Trump as the "peace president." It is MAGA that advocates for isolationism. Are you so stupid you don't know what "America First" means?

Yep, we did, and what Trump did IS America first. Stopping Iran from obtaining nukes IS America first. To obtain peace you must be credible in strength. Trump projected that with a very limited strike that was flawless. Doing nothing, and letting Iran continue which is what every American leader did up until now wasn't working. That is clear.

Progressives can never see beyond doing more of what doesn't work.

At any rate, advocating for restraint because you don't want to see Americans come home in body bags is among the most patriotic things one can do.

There hasn't been ANY indication that Trump would commit troops to ground action. And, while there is US personnel in the area, it is unlikely that Iran can do much damage or inflict significant causalities on our armed forces in the region. As evidenced by the missiles fired at our air field in Qutar, where there was plenty of warning, and all missiles but one were shot down, and reported no damage, and no casualties...

What you see as "patriotic" others see as undermining, and traitorous defense of our enemies.

 

[j-mac]

No doubt you’ve never read these words. Any idea who said them?

"The Constitution vests the power of declaring War with Congress, therefore no offensive expedition of importance can be undertaken until after they shall have deliberated upon the subject, and authorised such a measure."

You cling to Washington's words....Now to today, and the real world....

"The president’s Article II authority as Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces. Article II gives the executive authority to carry out military actions to defend the United States, as long as these actions do not rise to the level of war in actual or predicted nature, scope, or duration. The War Powers Resolution of 1973 limits this power, preventing the president from engaging military forces for more than 60 days without Congressional authorization."

 

[WEATHER53]

Got it. No nuts.

What you got is a beat down on your USA last commie bullshit

 

[WEATHER53]

No doubt you’ve never read these words. Any idea who said them?

"The Constitution vests the power of declaring War with Congress, therefore no offensive expedition of importance can be undertaken until after they shall have deliberated upon the subject, and authorised such a measure."

See no war was declared. A preventative 45 minute attack occurred. Lie and cry elsewhere

 

[Lisa558]

See no war was declared. A preventative 45 minute attack occurred. Lie and cry elsewhere

The antisemitic leftists are very upset that Iran won’t be able to drop a nuke on Israel.

 

[WEATHER53]

You cling to Washington's words....Now to today, and the real world....

"The president’s Article II authority as Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces. Article II gives the executive authority to carry out military actions to defend the United States, as long as these actions do not rise to the level of war in actual or predicted nature, scope, or duration. The War Powers Resolution of 1973 limits this power, preventing the president from engaging military forces for more than 60 days without Congressional authorization."

Yes their are qualifications for”war” but lib loons are changing word definitions once Again

 

[j-mac]

Yes their are qualifications for”war” but lib loons are changing word definitions once Again

Oh yeah, If they're not flipping definitions, they are gaslighting...They have nothing....And it's evident.

 

[dblack]

Trump ran on a platform of no more American intervention in foreign wars. He has now intervened in a foreign war.

No wonder you MAGAs are confused.

Whiplash

 

[Nobody911]

Scene 3 , act 1 : BP oil, Operation Ajax, Iran’s hatred

Title : Dunes of Destiny( war drama series )
Starring : Taco Trump and MAGA
Duration : Unknown
Directed by : Taco Trump
Supported by : Pentagon Production and MIC( Military-industrial complex )


The relationship between BP oil company, Operation Ajax, and Iran’s anti-Western sentiment is deeply intertwined and rooted in the 1953 Iranian coup d'état.

BP and British Oil Interests in Iran

The Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), which later became British Petroleum (BP), had extensive control over Iranian oil since the early 20th century. In 1951, Iran’s democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh nationalized the Iranian oil industry, aiming to end British control and exploitation of Iran’s oil resources. This move threatened British economic interests and led to a British-led international boycott of Iranian oil, severely damaging Iran’s economy17.

Operation Ajax and the 1953 Coup

To protect these oil interests and counter what they perceived as a potential Soviet influence in Iran during the Cold War, the United States and the United Kingdom orchestrated a covert operation known as Operation Ajax (CIA code name TP-AJAX) in 1953. The operation involved the CIA and British intelligence working together to overthrow Mosaddegh’s government and reinstate the pro-Western Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. The coup was motivated by the desire to restore Western control over Iranian oil and to prevent Iran from aligning with the Soviet Union1257.

Aftermath and Anti-Western Sentiment

Following the coup, the Shah returned to power and signed an agreement that allowed a consortium of Western oil companies, including BP (formerly AIOC), to control Iranian oil production, diluting Iran’s national control. The Shah used oil revenues to modernize and Westernize Iran but also ruled increasingly as an autocrat, suppressing political dissent. This period sowed deep resentment among many Iranians toward Western interference, particularly the U.S. and Britain, as it was seen as a betrayal of Iranian sovereignty and democracy15.

This resentment contributed significantly to the rise of anti-Western sentiment in Iran, culminating in the 1979 Islamic Revolution. The revolution overthrew the Shah and established an Islamic Republic under Ayatollah Khomeini, who was strongly anti-Western. The legacy of Operation Ajax and Western involvement in Iran’s oil and politics is often cited as a root cause of enduring hostility toward the West in Iran25.

Summary

BP (then AIOC) represented British oil interests in Iran.

Mosaddegh’s nationalization of oil threatened BP and British control.

Operation Ajax was a CIA- and British-led coup to overthrow Mosaddegh and protect oil interests.

The coup restored the Shah, who favored Western oil companies including BP.

This intervention fueled long-lasting anti-Western sentiment in Iran, influencing future events like the 1979 Islamic Revolution1257.

Thus, BP’s oil interests, Operation Ajax, and Iran’s anti-Western sentiment are linked through the 1953 coup that reshaped Iran’s political landscape and its relationship with the West.

sources:

1. 1953 Iranian coup d'état - Wikipedia
2. 1953 coup in Iran | Coup D’etat, Description & Facts | Britannica
3. Operation Ajax (1953)
4. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/the central intelligence [15369853].pdf
5. What Was Operation Ajax?
6. https://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/intellipedia/intellipedia-operationajax.pdf
7. 1953 Iranian coup d'état - Wikipedia
8. Why does Iran hate the West? For decades, Iran's fate was controlled by APOC, a company now known as British Petroleum

 

[JLW]

That I cited.
With the terms I copied and posted.

Now...
Point out the isolationism you claim inherent to "America First".

First, I couldn't give a hoot what the Trump for President website says.

The fact is, as everyone knows, Trump ran on a platform of "Vote for me to keep America out of foreign wars."

We know that was BS and why you MAGAs, as well as everyone else, I presume, are confused as to whether Trump is an "isolationist" or "interventionist."

As one person put it:

"Observing Trump’s tariff policy and skepticism about alliances like NATO reveals the Trump administration as a staunch advocate of isolationism. Bringing troops home and showing disinterest in foreign wars further reflects this policy. In his early days, he halted aid to organizations like USAID. He withdrew from various multilateral treaties during his first term, including the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). This time, he revoked the Paris Agreement. Trump’s open criticism of being the sole major donor to NATO and, until the Ukraine deal, his halt in funding Ukraine against Russian annexation—all these actions, along with global tariff impositions, suggest that Trump may be leading the U.S. back into an era of isolationism and protectionist policies."

So all that points to being an isolationist.

However Trump has diverged from isolationism to unilateralism. Unilateralism refers to a state acting independently in international affairs without seeking the cooperation or consent of other states.

Perhaps two sides of the same coin, but it makes for a confused foreign policy.

 

[playtime]

They can be mad at us WITH nukes or WITHOUT nukes.

You prefer the with nukes part. Terrorists. With nukes.

Demonic

donny did when he broke the deal we had AND there were inspections, Q-Q.

donny breaks everything he touches.

 

[WEATHER53]

Scene 3 , act 1 : BP oil, Operation Ajax, Iran’s hatred

View attachment 1128476

Title : Dunes of Destiny( war drama series )
Starring : Taco Trump and MAGA
Duration : Unknown
Directed by : Taco Trump
Supported by : Pentagon Production and MIC( Military-industrial complex )


The relationship between BP oil company, Operation Ajax, and Iran’s anti-Western sentiment is deeply intertwined and rooted in the 1953 Iranian coup d'état.

BP and British Oil Interests in Iran

The Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), which later became British Petroleum (BP), had extensive control over Iranian oil since the early 20th century. In 1951, Iran’s democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh nationalized the Iranian oil industry, aiming to end British control and exploitation of Iran’s oil resources. This move threatened British economic interests and led to a British-led international boycott of Iranian oil, severely damaging Iran’s economy17.

Operation Ajax and the 1953 Coup

To protect these oil interests and counter what they perceived as a potential Soviet influence in Iran during the Cold War, the United States and the United Kingdom orchestrated a covert operation known as Operation Ajax (CIA code name TP-AJAX) in 1953. The operation involved the CIA and British intelligence working together to overthrow Mosaddegh’s government and reinstate the pro-Western Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. The coup was motivated by the desire to restore Western control over Iranian oil and to prevent Iran from aligning with the Soviet Union1257.

Aftermath and Anti-Western Sentiment

Following the coup, the Shah returned to power and signed an agreement that allowed a consortium of Western oil companies, including BP (formerly AIOC), to control Iranian oil production, diluting Iran’s national control. The Shah used oil revenues to modernize and Westernize Iran but also ruled increasingly as an autocrat, suppressing political dissent. This period sowed deep resentment among many Iranians toward Western interference, particularly the U.S. and Britain, as it was seen as a betrayal of Iranian sovereignty and democracy15.

This resentment contributed significantly to the rise of anti-Western sentiment in Iran, culminating in the 1979 Islamic Revolution. The revolution overthrew the Shah and established an Islamic Republic under Ayatollah Khomeini, who was strongly anti-Western. The legacy of Operation Ajax and Western involvement in Iran’s oil and politics is often cited as a root cause of enduring hostility toward the West in Iran25.

Summary

BP (then AIOC) represented British oil interests in Iran.

Mosaddegh’s nationalization of oil threatened BP and British control.

Operation Ajax was a CIA- and British-led coup to overthrow Mosaddegh and protect oil interests.

The coup restored the Shah, who favored Western oil companies including BP.

This intervention fueled long-lasting anti-Western sentiment in Iran, influencing future events like the 1979 Islamic Revolution1257.

Thus, BP’s oil interests, Operation Ajax, and Iran’s anti-Western sentiment are linked through the 1953 coup that reshaped Iran’s political landscape and its relationship with the West.

sources:

1. 1953 Iranian coup d'état - Wikipedia
2. 1953 coup in Iran | Coup D’etat, Description & Facts | Britannica
3. Operation Ajax (1953)
4. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/the central intelligence [15369853].pdf
5. What Was Operation Ajax?
6. https://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/intellipedia/intellipedia-operationajax.pdf
7. 1953 Iranian coup d'état - Wikipedia
8. Why does Iran hate the West? For decades, Iran's fate was controlled by APOC, a company now known as British Petroleum

Tower of Babble

 

[The Duke]

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

Just remember, when Reagan gave Bin Laden guns, he was a "Freedom Fighter". Those dirty stinking commies were teaching girls to read!!! Then he turned on us and knocked down some buildings, and he became a "Terrorist".

Only one country has ever used nukes on human beings. We do not have the moral high ground here.

Actually we do, but not for any way that you'd ever recognize.
You have zero moral compass. STFU.
It's called standing up for God's chosen people, boy.
Because that's what God would have us do. The maker of this earth.

 

[WEATHER53]

Actually we do, but not for any way that you'd ever recognize.
You have zero moral compass. STFU.

What freedoms are Iran’s “freedom fighters” fighting for?? Their only oppressor is Ayatollah Bigasshola

 

[Rambunctious]

Ayatollah Bigasshola

 

[playtime]

Hogwash. They blew up over 200 US marines, rammed a big Navy ship, we endured 2001 WTC from muslim savage. They cost the planet 10s’ of trillions in terrorism repair alone. Time to slap them around.

let israel deal with them.

btw - that WMD slant is not going over well. people don't want another quagmire.

as for 2001 & the WTC ... why aren't the saudiis being dealt with? seems donny has a deal already.

Trump Golf to Host Three LIV Golf Events in 2023​

"Building off of the amazing success in 2022, we are honored to be hosting three LIV Golf events at our properties this year. Trump National Golf Club, Bedminster, Trump National Doral and Trump National Golf Club, Washington D.C. are three of the most spectacular properties anywhere in the world and we look forward to delivering an incredible experience for players and fans. What LIV Golf accomplished in their first season was truly remarkable and we are excited to raise the bar even higher together in 2023." - Eric Trump, Executive Vice President, The Trump Organization
Trump Golf to Host Three LIV Golf Events in 2023

& not only does donny get an airplane from the mnoooooooooslem qataris; he's done a deal with them as well...

Trump reveals $3 billion luxury development in Qatar to include 18-hole championship course​

By Harry Grimshaw
|May 14, 2025
Trump reveals $3 billion Qatar development with 18-hole course

whatch'a got on that spin wagon to 'splain this, 'eh ralph?

 

[playtime]

So you’re cut/paste

facts....

(from where?)

i always source my c/p facts. look for it.

means you know more than USA & Israel leaders?

The collapse of Iran’s 2015 nuclear deal​

Iran’s 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, negotiated under then-President Barack Obama, allowed Iran to enrich uranium to 3.67% — enough to fuel a nuclear power plant but far below the threshold of 90% needed for weapons-grade uranium. It also drastically reduced Iran’s stockpile of uranium, limited its use of centrifuges and relied on the IAEA to oversee Tehran’s compliance through additional oversight.

But President Donald Trump in his first term in 2018 unilaterally withdrew America from the accord, insisting it wasn’t tough enough and didn’t address Iran’s missile program or its support for militant groups in the wider Mideast. That set in motion years of tensions, including attacks at sea and on land.

Iran now enriches up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels. It also has enough of a stockpile to build multiple nuclear bombs, should it choose to do so. Iran has long insisted its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, but the IAEA, Western intelligence agencies and others say Tehran had an organized weapons program up until 2003.

IAEA inspections and Iran​

Under the 2015 deal, Iran agreed to allow the IAEA even greater access to its nuclear program. That included permanently installing cameras and sensors at nuclear sites. Those cameras, inside of metal housings sprayed with a special blue paint that shows any attempt to tamper with it, took still images of sensitive sites. Other devices, known as online enrichment monitors, measured the uranium enrichment level at Iran’s Natanz nuclear facility.

The IAEA also regularly sent inspectors into Iranian sites to conduct surveys, sometimes collecting environmental samples with cotton clothes and swabs that would be tested at IAEA labs back in Austria. Others monitor Iranian sites via satellite images.

In the years since Trump’s 2018 decision, Iran has limited IAEA inspections and stopped the agency from accessing camera footage. It’s also removed cameras. At one point, Iran accused an IAEA inspector of testing positive for explosive nitrates, something the agency disputed.

The IAEA has engaged in years of negotiations with Iran to restore full access for its inspectors. While Tehran hasn’t granted that, it also hasn’t entirely thrown inspectors out. Analysts view this as part of Iran’s wider strategy to use its nuclear program as a bargaining chip with the West.
What to know about inspections of Iran's nuclear program by the IAEA ahead of a key board vote

if iran has the capability & the materials, it is because yer chosen one did exactly what needed to be done to get that in motion.

​

 

[gipper]

You'll just have to be content with being a loser.

Can’t fix stupid.

 

[WEATHER53]

Can’t fix stupid.

He’s that simple to feel a one time attack is “engaging in a war” A war has lengths of weeks months and years. Not minutes with no response.
It more pitiful word definition change attempts by the emotetards.

 

[playtime]

He’s that simple to feel a one time attack is “engaging in a war” A war has lengths of weeks months and years. Not minutes with no response.
It more pitiful word definition change attempts by the emotetards.

the iranians are long term visionists.

What is a sleeper cell, and why are US officials on high alert?​

• US warns sleeper cell threat is rising amid tensions with Iran
• Former FBI agent: Sleeper threats may enter through US borders
• Public urged to stay alert; DHS issues worldwide caution warning

Taylor Delandro, Rich McHugh

Updated: Jun 23, 2025 / 05:59 PM CDT

What are sleeper cells, and how do they operate?​

Sleeper cells are spies or terrorists who operate in rival countries and remain inactive until they are essentially ordered to act.

NewsNation national security contributor Tracy Walder explained that while the concept of Iranian sleeper cells in the U.S. is not new, there may have been a recent influx of agents.

Timeline: How US conducted bombings on Iranian nuclear sites
“They have sleeper cells here. Quite frankly, they have for decades. … They are just waiting for the right moment,” Walder said.

A recent Homeland Security threat assessment confirms that Iran remains a primary state sponsor of terrorism and continues efforts to target both current and former U.S. officials. That assessment echoes similar warnings issued by the Biden administration in 2024.
https://www.newsnationnow.com/world/what-is-a-sleeper-cell/